| bio | website | math.brown.edu/~lubinj |
|---|---|---|
| location | Minnesota | |
| age | 76 | |
| visits | member for | 1 year, 7 months |
| seen | 16 hours ago | |
| stats | profile views | 1,167 |
Aged mathematician
|
Apr 12 |
comment |
Show set of all differentiable functions $f\colon [0,1]\to\mathbb R$ is uncountable. It seems to me that the problem that was posed did not ask you to show that there were (continuum) many differentiable functions but just uncountably many. So showing that there are at least (continuum) many differentiable functions should do it. |
|
Apr 12 |
answered | Finding root using Hensel's Lemma |
|
Apr 12 |
comment |
Finding root using Hensel's Lemma The version of Hensel that I learned is exactly the one you mention in your second paragraph, and I think people who are under the impression that Hensel is a root-finding theorem have been cheated. |
|
Apr 12 |
answered | projective cubic curve to complex projectie space |
|
Apr 12 |
answered | Finding $x$, where $\int_{r-x}^r \sqrt{r^2 - t^2} dt = A$ |
|
Apr 11 |
answered | Finding irreducible factors of a polynomial over $\mathbb{F}_3$ |
|
Apr 10 |
answered | Can a ring of positive characteristic have infinite number of elements? |
|
Apr 8 |
comment |
Finding the certain angle at the intersection point The most naive approach to this problem points out that a pair of intersecting lines divides the plane up into four V-shaped regions. Which one of these do you measure for its vertex angle? |
|
Apr 8 |
answered | Complex numbers $z$ such that $|z|= 1$ |
|
Apr 8 |
comment |
Does $\mathbb{F}_p((X))$ has only finitely many extension of a given degree? The local class field theory makes it clear that there are infinitely many cyclic extensions of degree $p$. |
|
Apr 8 |
comment |
Does $\mathbb{F}_p((X))$ has only finitely many extension of a given degree? Sorry, not right, 3.19 is for $\mathbb Q_p$ only. |
|
Apr 7 |
comment |
Lef $f \colon \mathbb{R}→ \mathbb{R}$ be a continuous function.Which of the following is always true? I would have used the sine function for my counterexample for 3 and 4. |
|
Apr 4 |
comment |
Number of irreducible polynomials of degree $3$ over $\mathbb{F}_3$ and $\mathbb{F}_5$. This is such a neat result, I always tried to slip it in when I was teaching abstract algebra. |
|
Apr 4 |
comment |
Number of irreducible polynomials of degree $3$ over $\mathbb{F}_3$ and $\mathbb{F}_5$. Because if $\alpha$, $\beta$, and $\gamma$ make up a set of conjugates, then $(x-\alpha)(x-\beta)(x-\gamma)$ is a polynomial with coeffs in $\mathbb F_p$, necessarily irreducible. So the set of all conj. triples can be looked at as the same as the set of monic irreds of deg $3$, and there are $N/3$ triples, if $N$ is the number of cubic irrationalities in the $\mathbb F(p^3)$ |
|
Apr 4 |
comment |
How to prove $\left(\frac{a}{(a,b)}, \frac{b}{(a,b)}\right) = 1$? What do you know? An answer will depend on what stage you’re at in number theory. |
|
Apr 4 |
answered | Number of irreducible polynomials of degree $3$ over $\mathbb{F}_3$ and $\mathbb{F}_5$. |
|
Apr 4 |
comment |
Number of irreducible polynomials of degree $3$ over $\mathbb{F}_3$ and $\mathbb{F}_5$. Uniqueness of factorization is always described or defined up to units of the ring in question. Here, the units of $k[x]$ are the constants of $k$. So God’s in his heaven, all’s right with the world. |
|
Apr 4 |
comment |
Number of irreducible polynomials of degree $3$ over $\mathbb{F}_3$ and $\mathbb{F}_5$. Ordinarily, people count monic polynomials. Is that what you have in mind? |
|
Apr 2 |
comment |
Fixed field of automorphisms determined by $t\mapsto at+b$. Another hint: often you can find the fixed field of a group by taking a nice thing upstairs and calculating its norm down to the fixed field. It’s surprising how often this works. |
|
Apr 2 |
comment |
Fixed field of automorphisms determined by $t\mapsto at+b$. Good, and the subgroup you found was normal, right? So the intermediate field you found is normal over the fixed field, of degree $p-1$, and you have the $p-1$-th roots of unity in all fields, so the intermediate field is gotten from the fixed field by adjoining a $p-1$-th root of something or other, right? This ought to lead to the fixed field itself... |