meta user
network profile
| bio | website | |
|---|---|---|
| location | ||
| age | ||
| visits | member for | 1 year, 7 months |
| seen | May 15 at 18:16 | |
| stats | profile views | 99 |
Objective competence and experience in the following subjects: Photography/lenses, fitness, electric guitar, golf, tennis, trading stocks, nutrition, chess, programming, and wine tasting. PM me for information on any of these topics.
|
May 15 |
comment |
TI83+ emulator for Windows 7? (Old XP one doesn't work) What, then, is the spirit of the forum? |
|
May 14 |
revised |
TI83+ emulator for Windows 7? (Old XP one doesn't work) edited tags |
|
May 14 |
comment |
TI83+ emulator for Windows 7? (Old XP one doesn't work) I found "wabbit" and it seems to work. Thanks! |
|
May 14 |
asked | TI83+ emulator for Windows 7? (Old XP one doesn't work) |
|
Apr 30 |
comment |
What is the point of those “properties of limits” functions? @julien, for a piecewise function like yours, you would not be able to use the 4 properties to determine a limit anyway, right? |
|
Apr 30 |
comment |
What is the point of those “properties of limits” functions? @AakashM You would still be dividing by zero either way, right? The limit when using forula #4 in the OP would be 0/0 or undef. |
|
Apr 30 |
asked | What is the point of those “properties of limits” functions? |
|
Mar 3 |
comment |
Dealt 3 cards. Odds of being dealt any pair? Thanks for the explanation!! Last thing, dividing by 6 in the first calculation is to remove the 3! ways of ordering 3 cards? |
|
Mar 3 |
accepted | Dealt 3 cards. Odds of being dealt any pair? |
|
Mar 3 |
revised |
Dealt 3 cards. Odds of being dealt any pair? deleted 2 characters in body |
|
Mar 3 |
asked | Dealt 3 cards. Odds of being dealt any pair? |
|
Feb 28 |
comment |
Arbitrarily discarding/cancelling Radians units when plugging angular speed into linear speed formula? Thank you Zev and Cameron. Let me sit in silence and ponder this. For now, I understand that once you introduce a radian measure into a linear measurement, the radians no longer apply, just the scalar value does. |
|
Feb 28 |
accepted | Arbitrarily discarding/cancelling Radians units when plugging angular speed into linear speed formula? |
|
Feb 28 |
comment |
Arbitrarily discarding/cancelling Radians units when plugging angular speed into linear speed formula? Makes sense. Almost. Since "radians" are dimensionless, why use it? It cancels. In the first equation, the rock rotates 180 times in a minute. So, it covers 360pi radians in a minute. In this equation, you must use radians to describe 360pi somethings per minute. In the 2nd equation, you are simply multiplying radius by this how much angle it sweeps per minute. Doesn't the same thing apply? 2 times 360pi somethings. No need to describe what there are 360pi's of? 360pi seems meaningless without the units to describe what you're counting (radians) |
|
Feb 28 |
asked | Arbitrarily discarding/cancelling Radians units when plugging angular speed into linear speed formula? |
|
Feb 15 |
revised |
Circular motion: Angular speed vs. linear speed problems. added 24 characters in body |
|
Feb 15 |
asked | Circular motion: Angular speed vs. linear speed problems. |
|
Feb 13 |
awarded | Notable Question |
|
Feb 12 |
awarded | Critic |
|
Feb 12 |
awarded | Yearling |
