meta user
network profile
| bio | website | |
|---|---|---|
| location | ||
| age | ||
| visits | member for | 1 year, 7 months |
| seen | May 14 '12 at 21:22 | |
| stats | profile views | 841 |
|
Oct 2 |
awarded | Yearling |
|
May 13 |
comment |
Combinatorics question in the style of Van der Waerden's theorem $X$ should be of size at most $N^{1-\epsilon(r)}$. |
|
May 11 |
comment |
Combinatorics question in the style of Van der Waerden's theorem Well, your new $a+b$ can be some $a'+l b'$ for some other $a'$ and $b'$ used before; so the problem basically asks for an example when this happens a lot |
|
May 11 |
comment |
Combinatorics question in the style of Van der Waerden's theorem I abused the big $O$ notation; edited again |
|
May 11 |
revised |
Combinatorics question in the style of Van der Waerden's theorem added 27 characters in body |
|
May 11 |
comment |
Combinatorics question in the style of Van der Waerden's theorem The term "translates" made things unclear, yes. I edited; now things should be correct. |
|
May 11 |
revised |
Combinatorics question in the style of Van der Waerden's theorem added 5 characters in body |
|
May 11 |
asked | Combinatorics question in the style of Van der Waerden's theorem |
|
May 2 |
comment |
Exercise from Stein with partial differential operator Edited. Sorry for not being thorough. |
|
May 2 |
revised |
Exercise from Stein with partial differential operator added 168 characters in body |
|
May 2 |
asked | Exercise from Stein with partial differential operator |
|
May 2 |
comment |
Polynomial divisibility over the integers sorry for the post; I tried to close it but apparently I can't. |
|
May 2 |
accepted | Polynomial divisibility over the integers |
|
Apr 25 |
comment |
Polynomial divisibility over the integers Yes, you are right penarthur, I apologize; as for strictness, it's "only greater or equal"... I'm not sure if the statement is true anymore though. Sorry for the trouble |
|
Apr 24 |
asked | Polynomial divisibility over the integers |
|
Apr 23 |
comment |
-Almost- self-adjoint bounded operators on Hilbert spaces Very nice. Thanks! |
|
Apr 23 |
accepted | -Almost- self-adjoint bounded operators on Hilbert spaces |
|
Apr 19 |
revised |
-Almost- self-adjoint bounded operators on Hilbert spaces added 8 characters in body |
|
Apr 19 |
comment |
Yet another exercise from Stein's Real Analysis Thanks a lot; got it. What about $\lambda = 0$. Do you know any simple counterexample? |
|
Apr 19 |
comment |
-Almost- self-adjoint bounded operators on Hilbert spaces Can anyone provide a proof with more details? I'm not sure I understand after all.. |
