meta user
network profile
| bio | website | linkedin.com/in/gt6989b |
|---|---|---|
| location | New York, NY | |
| age | 34 | |
| visits | member for | 1 year, 8 months |
| seen | yesterday | |
| stats | profile views | 150 |
|
Feb 26 |
comment |
Having a lot of trouble solving this recurrence with iteration and finding a closed form… @macydanim I just kept his original question to the bes tof my understanding ability :), not sure what he meant... |
|
Feb 26 |
answered | Having a lot of trouble solving this recurrence with iteration and finding a closed form… |
|
Feb 26 |
revised |
Having a lot of trouble solving this recurrence with iteration and finding a closed form… LaTeX edits |
|
Feb 26 |
suggested | suggested edit on Having a lot of trouble solving this recurrence with iteration and finding a closed form… |
|
Feb 26 |
comment |
What really means when the teacher asks me to iterate on Gauss-Seidel considering a maximum variation of 0.01? @Totty Great. I am glad to be of help... |
|
Feb 26 |
comment |
How to do long division of 5555 / 55 @Imray see the edited version with another hint. |
|
Feb 26 |
revised |
How to do long division of 5555 / 55 added 87 characters in body |
|
Feb 26 |
answered | How to do long division of 5555 / 55 |
|
Feb 26 |
comment |
What really means when the teacher asks me to iterate on Gauss-Seidel considering a maximum variation of 0.01? In other words, error is approximately $|x_{n+1}-x_n|$ (absolute) or $|1-x_{n+1}/x_n|$ or, equivalently, $|1-x_n/x_{n+1}|$ (relative). |
|
Feb 26 |
comment |
What really means when the teacher asks me to iterate on Gauss-Seidel considering a maximum variation of 0.01? @Totty No, you never have the real value, after all, your numerical procedure is only there so you can approximate it. Your notions of error (both absolute and relative) come from consecutive sequence terms, with the notion that once you start approaching the true value (supposedly the limit of your value sequence), the size of the steps will start coming down (until, theoretically, it is 0 at the limit point). The whole idea is that the current step size gives an approximation for the real error. But again, since the real value isn't known, true error isn't known either - only approximation. |
|
Feb 22 |
comment |
Exactly one of the following systems is solvable en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Linear_programming#Duality |
|
Feb 21 |
revised |
Exactly one of the following systems is solvable item list fixing |
|
Feb 21 |
suggested | suggested edit on Exactly one of the following systems is solvable |
|
Feb 21 |
comment |
Exactly one of the following systems is solvable Remains to prove that "neither is true" is impossible. |
|
Feb 21 |
comment |
Finding the Angle theta between two 2d vectors. It's not $3^3$ but $3^2$ in the denominator's right factor under the square root.... |
|
Feb 21 |
answered | Finding the Angle theta between two 2d vectors. |
|
Feb 21 |
answered | Can someone help me understand this statement? P(t+h)h < P(t) - P(t+h) < P(t)h ? more details inside |
|
Feb 21 |
comment |
Existence of a stationary distribution for a random walk Are you saying the number of neighbors (i.e. the degree) of each vertex is the same, or just uniformly bounded? If not the same, is it random? |
|
Feb 21 |
revised |
Polynomials with integer coefficients formatting bullets for readability |
|
Feb 21 |
comment |
Exponential Growth Curve What exactly are you trying to model? What is the probabilistic part of the experiment? |
