Reputation
4,935
Next privilege 5,000 Rep.
Approve tag wiki edits
Badges
6 16 49
Impact
~80k people reached

Jul
5
comment Looking for elementary proof of “for a circle, $C^2/A = 4 \pi$”
@DavidC.Ullrich: I've been intentionally vague on the points you mention precisely because I don't know what's possible. For example, AFAIK, at least as of not too long, the only proof known of Fermat's Last Theorem relied on mathematics established well after Fermat's time. For all I know, something similar is true of the theorem in this post. In that case, I'm interested in a proof that requires the least additional mathematics than was know by the ancients who were already familiar with the theorem.
Jul
5
comment Looking for elementary proof of “for a circle, $C^2/A = 4 \pi$”
@ajotatxe: did you learn integration before you learned this result?
Jul
5
comment Looking for elementary proof of “for a circle, $C^2/A = 4 \pi$”
@MichaelHardy: I suppose that one can use either the area or the circumference of the unit circle as the basis for the definition of $\pi$. But then one would need to show that the same number of this definition reappears in the post's theorem's formula.
Jul
5
revised Looking for elementary proof of “for a circle, $C^2/A = 4 \pi$”
deleted 5 characters in body
Jul
5
asked Looking for elementary proof of “for a circle, $C^2/A = 4 \pi$”
May
28
revised What's the name of this tensor product?
deleted 18 characters in body
May
28
asked What's the name of this tensor product?
May
26
accepted Looking for a “Guide for the Perplexed by Low-dimensional Topology”
May
25
accepted Looking for student's guide to diagram chasing
May
25
comment Looking for a “Guide for the Perplexed by Low-dimensional Topology”
@GregoryGrant: At least part of the reason I find this stuff unsettling is that pretty much everywhere else (outside of areas devoted to these dimension-specific peculiarities) the sets $\mathbb{R}^n$ are treated as "basically the same" modulo a "trivial" difference in the dimensions. In particular, people routinely reason about "$\mathbb{R}^n$" (for some unspecified $n$) by analogy with their intuitions about $\mathbb{R}^d$ for $d \in \{1, 2, 3\}$. If every dimension has its own quirks, such thinking by analogy (where the target of the analogy is wholly unfamiliar) becomes highly suspect.
May
25
asked Looking for a “Guide for the Perplexed by Low-dimensional Topology”
May
23
awarded  Popular Question
May
19
revised On random rotational fluctuations in $\mathbb{R}^n$
removed a redundant term in second equation; fixed a couple of small typos
May
16
revised Conditions for “equal cardinality $\Rightarrow$ equal (finite) measure”?
deleted 3 characters in body
May
16
comment Conditions for “equal cardinality $\Rightarrow$ equal (finite) measure”?
@PhoemueX: I've edited my post in response to your comment.
May
16
revised Conditions for “equal cardinality $\Rightarrow$ equal (finite) measure”?
added 420 characters in body
May
16
revised Conditions for “equal cardinality $\Rightarrow$ equal (finite) measure”?
edited title
May
16
asked Conditions for “equal cardinality $\Rightarrow$ equal (finite) measure”?
May
14
awarded  Nice Question
May
12
comment On random rotational fluctuations in $\mathbb{R}^n$
Thanks for posting this! It is indeed beyond my grasp, as you predicted. Since it's probably bad form to accept an answer that one can't understand, I won't until I do, but I'm working on it! I will use your answer as something to aim for. Thanks again.