Tim
Reputation
12,347
Top tag
Next privilege 15,000 Rep.
Protect questions
 Sep 3 asked Determine measurability of E(X|N) or even $\sigma(E(X|N))$? Sep 3 comment Independence between conditional expectations right. @Domink. thanks. How about the second question? I was wondering if E(X|N) must be measurable wrt both sigma(X) and N? Sep 3 asked Independence between conditional expectations Sep 3 comment Are the converses of the following special cases of conditional expectation also true? why "both X and Y are square-integrable"? Sep 3 comment Are the converses of the following special cases of conditional expectation also true? Thanks. what is about X that is equivalent to E(X|N)=EX a.e., if independence is too much? Sep 3 asked Are the converses of the following special cases of conditional expectation also true? Sep 2 comment Is conditional expectation E(X|N) an a.e. equivalence class wrt N or underlying sigma algebra? Let me put it in another way: If Y1 and Y2 are both in E(Y|N), are they equal a.e. (wrt N)? Sep 1 comment Is conditional expectation E(X|N) an a.e. equivalence class wrt N or underlying sigma algebra? "It's conceivable that you can specify criterion to partition E(X|N) into disjoint classes" doesn't make sense. I guess you know that the a.e. is a equivalent relation on the set of random variables, so the a.e. relation partitions the set of r.v.s. into equivalent classes. it isn't what I can change. My last comment is a well defined question Sep 1 comment Is conditional expectation E(X|N) an a.e. equivalence class wrt N or underlying sigma algebra? In that new measure space, can E(X|N) be several a.e. equivalent classes of N measurable functions? Sep 1 comment Is conditional expectation E(X|N) an a.e. equivalence class wrt N or underlying sigma algebra? In my last comment, by a.e.equivalent class, I meant for the new measure space with N as sigma algebra. so measurable functions are N measurable. In that new measure space, Is E(X|N) exactly an entire a.e. equivalent class of N measurable functions? Or several such classes? Or part of such a class? Sep 1 comment Is conditional expectation E(X|N) an a.e. equivalence class wrt N or underlying sigma algebra? Is E(X|N) exactly an entire a.e. equivalent class of N measurable functions? Or several such classes? Or part of such a class? Sep 1 comment Is conditional expectation E(X|N) an a.e. equivalence class wrt N or underlying sigma algebra? Can you show "there can exist a Y′ that equals Y a.e. but Y′ is not a member of E(X|N)"? I don't think so, because their integrals on any measurable set are same Sep 1 comment Does $X ⊥ Y \leftrightarrow X ⊥ Y | Z$ implies $(X,Y) ⊥ Z$? When is reverse used and when is converse? Sep 1 revised How to formulate the requirements that a counterexample must satisfy? added 486 characters in body Sep 1 comment How to formulate the requirements that a counterexample must satisfy? @Brian. In the linked post, to construct an example, we have to choose what the three random variables $X$ $Y$ and $Z$ are, though the three statements about the random variables are given and not changeable. Sep 1 revised How to formulate the requirements that a counterexample must satisfy? added 486 characters in body Sep 1 comment How to formulate the requirements that a counterexample must satisfy? @Brian: I should have added that $p_1, p_2$ and $p_3$ are given statements, which can't be changed. For an example, math.stackexchange.com/questions/1416468/… Sep 1 comment How to formulate the requirements that a counterexample must satisfy? @Brian: what do you mean by " take p2 and p3 to be the same statement"? p1, p2 and p3 are supposed to be given statements which can't be changed. Sep 1 comment How to formulate the requirements that a counterexample must satisfy? @Brian: Thanks. Is this a counterexample: $p_2$ and $p_3$ both are true, but $p_1$ isn't? How shall we find a counterexample that satisfies the requirement that $p_2$ and $p_3$ imply each other, although I know it means either both $p_2$ and $p_3$ are true, or neither is true. Sep 1 revised Does $X ⊥ Y \leftrightarrow X ⊥ Y | Z$ implies $(X,Y) ⊥ Z$? added 39 characters in body