Reputation
5,418
Next privilege 10,000 Rep.
Access moderator tools
Badges
1 12 41
Newest
 Nice Answer
Impact
~62k people reached

Jun
11
revised When does the regularity of $A$ implies the regularity of $A[w]$?
added 527 characters in body
Jun
11
answered When does the regularity of $A$ implies the regularity of $A[w]$?
Jun
9
revised Better understanding regular functions on a Projective variety
added 14 characters in body
Jun
5
answered Isomorphic projective subvarieties, non-isomorphic rings
Jun
5
revised Blow-up of pair of intersecting lines
deleted 47 characters in body
Jun
5
answered Blow-up of pair of intersecting lines
Jun
4
comment A categorical approach to algebraic geometry
I haven't read it, but you might have a look at Categories and Sheaves by Masaki Kashiwara and Pierre Schapira. It seems to contain lots of the stuff you want.
Jun
2
awarded  Yearling
May
21
revised Zeroes of prime polynomials in the algebraic torus (A Hilbert's Nullstellensatz for Laurent polynomials?)
added 213 characters in body
May
21
comment Zeroes of prime polynomials in the algebraic torus (A Hilbert's Nullstellensatz for Laurent polynomials?)
You are, of course, completely correct. Regarding your second thing, I missed the "different" ... so yea, you are right about that, too.
May
21
answered Zeroes of prime polynomials in the algebraic torus (A Hilbert's Nullstellensatz for Laurent polynomials?)
May
20
comment Can someone illustrate the definition of manifold with a simple example?
The most classical example would be the sphere in $\mathbb R^3$. For any point $x$, you can pick the point opposite to it $y$ and use the stereographic projection map to identify $M\setminus\{y\}$ with $\mathbb R^2$.
May
19
awarded  Enlightened
May
19
awarded  Nice Answer
May
19
comment Dimension of affine part equals to the dimension of the variety
The dimension of $\mathbb P^n$ is not equal to the Krull dimension of its projective coordinate ring $k[x_0,\ldots,x_n]$, which is $n+1$. That's because $\mathbb P^n$ is not an affine variety. The problem with your question is that it is ill-posed: What is your definition of the dimension of $\mathbb P^n$?
May
18
comment Inclusion of Tori induces surjection of character groups?
This is true, but I have too little time for anything but a reference right now: Tauvel & Yu, Lie algebras and algebraic groups, 22.5.4 (iii) is a slightly more general statement for diagonalizable algebraic groups. Any torus is diagonalizable, of course.
May
12
comment Inclusionwise maximal linear subvarieties of a projective variety
@DanielMcLaury: Interesting, I didn't see that angle. If I am not somehow mistaken, this is the image of a projective morphism, so it should be closed. Any flaws in that argument?
May
12
asked Inclusionwise maximal linear subvarieties of a projective variety
May
10
accepted Is every codimension one subvariety of a projective variety a set-theoretic complete intersection?
May
10
revised Is every codimension one subvariety of a projective variety a set-theoretic complete intersection?
added 639 characters in body; edited tags