465 reputation
312
bio website
location
age
visits member for 3 years, 1 month
seen Jul 8 at 9:48

Jul
2
awarded  Curious
Mar
17
awarded  Popular Question
Mar
6
awarded  Notable Question
Jan
29
accepted Compound Poisson Process: Stopping time distribution
Jan
28
revised Compound Poisson Process: Stopping time distribution
added 565 characters in body
Jan
27
revised Compound Poisson Process: Stopping time distribution
added 2 characters in body; edited tags
Jan
27
revised Compound Poisson Process: Stopping time distribution
deleted 1 characters in body
Jan
27
asked Compound Poisson Process: Stopping time distribution
Sep
11
revised Algorithm for best piecewise linear fit
added 1 characters in body
Sep
10
revised Algorithm for best piecewise linear fit
added 125 characters in body
Sep
10
asked Algorithm for best piecewise linear fit
Jul
18
awarded  Yearling
Apr
25
awarded  Tumbleweed
Apr
18
revised Linear equation with prescribed precision of result
added 29 characters in body
Apr
18
asked Linear equation with prescribed precision of result
Jan
23
awarded  Popular Question
Jun
18
accepted Different integrals for $\mathbb{C} \to \mathbb{C}$ functions
Jun
17
awarded  Critic
Jun
17
comment Different integrals for $\mathbb{C} \to \mathbb{C}$ functions
Let me see if I understand correctly. You say that these integrals are not only different but of a essentially different type. One is measure theory one is geometry. The thing they share is the symbol $\int$.
Jun
16
comment Different integrals for $\mathbb{C} \to \mathbb{C}$ functions
@ Siminore: $\mathbb{R}^2$ is not ordered either and we can do a fine integration theory on that. I do not see any problem. @ Zhen Lin: As I said they are different. But somehow in complex analysis only the path integral is used. So why is this the "right" integral for doing complex analysis? @ DonAntonio Yes but on the level of nice functions they are the same. My motivation comes from complex analysis, so I do not care about weirdly behaved functions.