Reputation
Next privilege 125 Rep.
Vote down
Badges
5
Newest
 Commentator
Impact
~66 people reached

  • 0 posts edited
  • 0 helpful flags
  • 14 votes cast
Jun
24
revised Inter-neighbor resistance on triangular prism
added 1862 characters in body
Jun
22
answered Inter-neighbor resistance on triangular prism
Nov
27
revised Notation of exactness
added 355 characters in body
Nov
27
comment Notation of exactness
@Lucian WolframAlpha says lim_(x->infinity) (2+2) = 4.
Nov
26
comment Notation of exactness
Thus proving Einstein's "Imagination is more important than knowledge."
Nov
26
awarded  Commentator
Nov
26
comment Notation of exactness
I'll take that as a yes.
Nov
26
comment Notation of exactness
So 2 + 2 = 4 is not universally true, because in apples, people may not believe that the second pair of apples exists?
Nov
26
comment Notation of exactness
My bad, that answer proved the proof for 2 + 2 = 5 false.
Nov
26
awarded  Scholar
Nov
26
accepted Notation of exactness
Nov
26
comment Notation of exactness
It appears that i misread that answer; it proves that the given proof is incorrect.
Nov
26
comment Notation of exactness
I thought math as accepted here was universally true.
Nov
26
comment Notation of exactness
Almost never is not never. How is this correct when your answer is also correct?
Nov
26
comment Notation of exactness
In Python, 2. is 2.0. As linked, 2 + 2 = 5 here. How is that possible if those values are exact?
Nov
26
comment Notation of exactness
Okay, so in math "2 apples" are exactly two apples, but in other science i have to write "exactly" if it's not clear from the context? Then what about the mathematical proof that 2 + 2 = 5?
Nov
26
awarded  Editor
Nov
26
revised Notation of exactness
added 55 characters in body
Nov
26
asked Notation of exactness
May
5
comment Why is Infinity multiplied by Zero not an easy Zero answer?
So you're saying 0 is not 0? How about "You can't limit infinity."?