| bio | website | cambridge.academia.edu/… |
|---|---|---|
| location | Cambridge, United Kingdom | |
| age | 23 | |
| visits | member for | 2 years |
| seen | 8 hours ago | |
| stats | profile views | 993 |
Currently undertaking Part III of the Mathematical Tripos at the University of Cambridge.
Previously obtained a B.S. in Mathematics and a B.A. in Physics from the University of Chicago (2012).
|
2d |
accepted | What is the appropriate topology on $C_c^\infty (\mathbb{R}^d)$? |
|
May 15 |
revised |
If $\sum_{n=1}^{\infty} a_n$ is absolutely convergent, then $\sum_{n=1}^{\infty} (a_n)^2$ is convergent deleted 11 characters in body |
|
May 8 |
awarded | Caucus |
|
Apr 28 |
comment |
A Conformal Mapping Question @Tsotsi Yes, the complex conjugate. |
|
Apr 27 |
revised |
Degree of maps on the 3-sphere added 1 characters in body |
|
Apr 27 |
comment |
Degree of maps on the 3-sphere @MattE Updated. |
|
Apr 27 |
revised |
Degree of maps on the 3-sphere Added formula |
|
Apr 27 |
asked | Degree of maps on the 3-sphere |
|
Apr 27 |
awarded | Yearling |
|
Feb 12 |
asked | Mathematical significance of the “Dirac conjugate” |
|
Feb 4 |
comment |
Hermitian conjugation and representations of the Lorentzian Clifford algebras $\vec{\gamma}$ is a collection of $2d-1$ matrices ($\gamma ^1$ through $\gamma ^{2d-1}$) of dimension $2^d\times 2^d$. |
|
Feb 4 |
comment |
Hermitian conjugation and representations of the Lorentzian Clifford algebras No. $\gamma ^0$ is supposed to be an $2^d\times 2^d$ matrix with complex entries. (I might have screwed up the dimension, but it is definitely a matrix of the same dimension as $\gamma ^i$ for $i\geq 1$.) |
|
Feb 4 |
comment |
Hermitian conjugation and representations of the Lorentzian Clifford algebras @rschwieb If I understand you correctly, then yes, that is right. I edited the post again to further clarify. Let me know if something is still unclear. |
|
Feb 4 |
revised |
Hermitian conjugation and representations of the Lorentzian Clifford algebras Typo |
|
Feb 4 |
revised |
Hermitian conjugation and representations of the Lorentzian Clifford algebras edited title |
|
Feb 4 |
comment |
Hermitian conjugation and representations of the Lorentzian Clifford algebras @rschwieb I edited the post in an attempt to make my notation more lucid. Please let me know if something is still unclear. |
|
Feb 4 |
revised |
Hermitian conjugation and representations of the Lorentzian Clifford algebras Clarified notation |
|
Feb 4 |
asked | Hermitian conjugation and representations of the Lorentzian Clifford algebras |
|
Jan 28 |
asked | Classification of irreducible representations via Casimirs |
|
Nov 22 |
comment |
Isometries of $\mathbb{R}^n$ Sure, but the point was that, in showing that $f$ is linear, I needed to know a priori that $f$ was surjective. |

