The tag has no wiki summary.

learn more… | top users | synonyms

9
votes
1answer
269 views

Type theory as foundations

Does anyone know any good references that describe type theoretical foundations of mathematics? I've read some books e.g. Winskel's The Formal Semantics of Programming Languages and Pierce's Types and ...
9
votes
1answer
266 views

Looking for an approach to mathematical notation wherein the universe is divided into disjoint worlds.

Is there a rigorous approach to mathematical notation wherein the "universe" is divided into disjoint "worlds," and the meaning of notation is world-dependent? This would solve a few pesky problems. ...
4
votes
1answer
118 views

Curry-Howard Correspondence (Proof Theory)

As you all know, the Curry-Howard correspondance provides a link between type theory and predicate logic. Concepts featured in the former, such as $\Pi$-type and $\Sigma$-type can, by the ...
1
vote
1answer
73 views

Typed Category Theory?

This small book (or long paper) describes objects and morphisims in a cateogry as having types. He also talks about pre-categories as categories with typeless objects and morphisims. While I am ...
1
vote
1answer
75 views

How to extract the sets “produced” by a axiomatic set theory, into some newly introduced collection?

Say I know well how to reason in a set theory, which for the sake of this question I'll call $\bf{ST}$, say one of those, it can by $\bf ZFC$. It's principally written down via first order logic and ...
0
votes
1answer
77 views

Natural numbers as types.

My question could be simple but I haven't found an answer for it: could we define a type theory where the types are the natural numbers themselves (not the set of the natural numbers)? Thanks.
9
votes
0answers
168 views

Reference on standard types

This question is about what I presume is a basic construction in type theory. The finite types are defined as follows: 0 is a finite type; if $\sigma, \tau$ are finite types, then so is ...
4
votes
0answers
103 views

W-types and inverse image functor

All sheaf topoi have W-types and in fact there's an explicit construction given by Benno van den Berg & Ieke Moerdijk, but the construction is quite involved. I would like to know whether the ...
3
votes
0answers
43 views

What is the desirable function identification when setting up arrows in the category of types?

My question is which functions can not be allowed in a statically typed programming language, so that the "canonical" category is less coarse than what you get if you define it's arrows to be ...
3
votes
0answers
52 views

Logic in closed symmetric monoidal categories; reference request.

Suppose we want an algebraic theory $T$ to be interpretable in any closed symmetric monoidal category $\mathbf{C}.$ I am thinking in particular of the case where $\mathbf{C}$ is the category of models ...
3
votes
0answers
80 views

Are large cardinals bi-interperable with type theory?

"Sets in Types, Types in Sets" establishes that the calculus of constructions is bi-interpretable with ZFC + infinitely many inaccessibles. Are there any more results like this higher up the large ...
2
votes
0answers
37 views

What if typing judgements were propositions?

Suppose we created a modified type theory in which typing judgments like $x : X$ are not judgments at all; rather, they're propositions. Would this be a bad idea? If so, why? A good answer should ...
2
votes
0answers
53 views

Set Theory - Well Order (Lexiographical combination)

Question: Prove constructively that if $(A_{1},\prec_{1})$ and $(A_{2},\prec_{2})$ are two well-ordered sets then their lexicographical combination $(A_{1} \times A_{2},<_{1,2})$ is also well ...
2
votes
0answers
69 views

What are the main differences between set theory versus pure type systems?

According to wikipedia, a pure type system: ...is a form of typed lambda calculus that allows an arbitrary number of sorts and dependencies between any of these... Pure type systems may ...
2
votes
0answers
79 views

Introductory text about different stratification methods in higher-order logic and set theory

Could someone recommend me a good overview text about stratification of predicates, comprehension axioms, and other methods of avoiding the paradoxes in untyped or only loosely/relatively typed ...
1
vote
0answers
48 views

Find subgraphs in a directed graph which are isolated by edge properties

Please excuse my small knowledge of graph theory vocabulary. I can only describe the problem with common english words. Maybe someone can point me into the right direction and/or terms to look up. ...
1
vote
0answers
33 views

Reductions under lambda in dependently typed lambda calculus

I am currently reading a Simon Thompson's Type Theory book. In chapter 5 he introduces a system TT(0,C), which limits a notion of reduction . In this notion of reduction, reductions under lambda are ...
1
vote
0answers
35 views

Proof that the empty type exists

Is there a proof that the empty type exists? If there is, it's not in my textbook and I haven't been able to find one online. I feel like if it's impossible to prove the existence of the empty type, ...
1
vote
0answers
46 views

Enumeration of symbols in grammatical expressions or vertices in tree graphs

I have expressions (type of a function) like e.g. $$f:(A\to B)\to C \to (D\to E)\to F.$$ (Where I understand $A\to B\to C$ as $A\to (B\to C)$, in case that is relevant.) There might be information ...
0
votes
0answers
16 views

Proving the Identity Type Has a Term

I am trying to get used to type theory. I have a couple of things to ask. Let $1$ be the unit type with unique term $\star : 1$. As an exercise I was trying to prove that $$ ...
0
votes
0answers
27 views

When is the higher-order theory of a model categorical?

I'm interested in (classical) type theories $L$ with the following property. For $M$ any model of $L$ (in Set), let $T(M)$ be the type theory of $M$, i.e., the strongest extension of $L$ satisfied by ...
0
votes
0answers
56 views

Continuations vs. Yoneda

There is this observation (worldpress blog) that the continuation monad (Wikipedia) stems from the Yoneda embedding. For fixed data types $R$, the monad maps data types $T$ to types $(T\to R)\to R$. ...
0
votes
0answers
26 views

Proper terminology for a pair of magmas

Given two magmas, call them $f$ and $g$ over the same set $a$, what do I call a tuple $h$ of them? With extra properties we call them such names as fields and rings. I am just looking for the generic ...
0
votes
0answers
32 views

Using types instead for basic proofs

Disclaimer: I know close to nothing about formal type theory, but I program intensively so prefer to think in terms of types. In typical math you write $a \in A$ to speak of the nature of your ...
0
votes
0answers
44 views

Proof of $(\forall x. \varepsilon(x)) \Rightarrow \bot $ in $\lambda\pi $ calculus $\equiv$

What is the right representation of the proof of $(\forall x. \varepsilon(x)) \Rightarrow \bot $ in simple type theory as a term of $\lambda\pi $ calculus $\equiv$? Note on notation: The epsilon ...
0
votes
0answers
21 views

Reexpressing the higher inductive-inductive surreals with only two mutual subdefinitions

In $\S 11.6$ of the HoTT book, the authors describe Conway's surreal numbers in terms of a higher inductive-inductive definition with three mutual subdefinitions. However, it seems to me that only ...