The tag has no wiki summary.

learn more… | top users | synonyms

1
vote
0answers
28 views

Subobject classifier in $Set^{C^{op}}$

I'm reading "Sheaves in geometry and logic" and I'm not sure if i'm understanding some definitions. We have our functor $\Omega$ defined on objects by $\Omega(C)$$=\{$$S|$ $S$ is a sieve on C in ...
0
votes
0answers
22 views

Terminal object in $Set^{C^{op}}$ and subobject classifier.

This is from Sheaves in Geometry and Logic pg 38. I'm not sure if I understood it correctly but the subobject classifier in $Set^{C^{op}}$ when $C$ is a small category is a map (natural ...
3
votes
1answer
112 views

Does internalization loses informations everywhere?

It is well known that a group object in Grp is necessarily abelian. This can be understood as "internalization loses information". Indeed, if one was to study group theory by looking at group objects ...
6
votes
1answer
56 views

Can a general version of the covariant powerset monad be derived from the universal property of power objects?

As the title asks, I'm wondering if one can generally squeeze a "covariant power object monad" out of a topos (following the usual example in $\mathcal{Set}$ with functor part the direct image ...
0
votes
0answers
22 views

A question about morphisms in a Grothendieck topos

I am not very familiar with topos theory so please excuse me if this is completely trivial. Fix an object $K$ in a Grothendieck topos $\mathcal{G}$. Let $k:0\to K$ be the unique morphism from the ...
2
votes
1answer
55 views

is the property of representability of a sheaf on the big etale site checkable on the small site?

Let $S$ be a scheme and $F$ a sheaf on $(\textbf{Sch}/S)_\text{etale}$, whose restriction to the small etale site $S_\text{etale}$ is representable (in fact in my case this restriction is ...
2
votes
0answers
38 views

When defining a Grothendieck pretopology,can we get away with less than the fibre product axiom?

$\newcommand\restr[2]{{\left.#1\right|_{#2}}}$ I'm fairly new to this whole area, so correct me if there are any technical errors in any of this. The base category for a classical sheaf is the ...
2
votes
1answer
37 views

The terminal object comes for free in the definition of a subobject classifier

This is Fact 1.4 in Tom Leinster's informal introduction to topos theory. It states the following: if there exists a mono $t:T \hookrightarrow \Omega$ that classifies the monos in our category, in the ...
3
votes
1answer
137 views

A Question on a claim regarding the notion of “space” in “Indiscrete Thoughts”

I'm reading Gian-Carlo Rota's book "Indiscrete Thoughts". In page 220 I came across a strange quotation with very few explanations: We thought that the generalizations of the notion of space had ...
0
votes
0answers
35 views

category of sheaves over an object

I'm looking for a solution of exercice III.8 (b) in Maclane and Moerdijk's book $\textit{Sheaves in Geometry and Logic}$. Where I can find such a solution ? Or can someone describe the topology J' ...
2
votes
0answers
71 views

Grothendieck Topology on the Category of Elements

We are given a site $(C, J)$ for a small category $C$ and a Grothendieck topology $J$. If $F\in Sh(C, J)$, we take the natural topology $J_F$ on its category of elements $el(F)$ induced by $J$. I am ...
16
votes
1answer
205 views

Revisiting “What is Mazzola's ”Topos of Music“ about?”

This question has been asked here: What is Mazzola's "Topos of Music" about? But I am dissatisfied with the response for several reasons and would like Math SE to revisit this ...
4
votes
1answer
63 views

sheaves of rings and maps to classifying topos

Let $R$ be the category of finitely presented commutative rings (but I don't know how necessary the hypothesis of finite presentation is for my question). Let $Set^R=Fun(R, Set)$ be the category of ...
2
votes
2answers
95 views

About certain regular epimorphisms in a Grothendieck Topos

I am supposed to prove a rather technical property which should hold in any Grothendieck Topos, but I have troubles in accomplishing this task. Here is the context for the question. Let then ...
3
votes
0answers
42 views

Equivalence of Modules

The category of modules over a ring can be viewed as an enriched version of an action of a monoid on a set (see nLab entry). Moreover, if $R$ is a commutative ring, the category of modules over it is ...
4
votes
0answers
60 views

Equivalent definitions of regular categories?

maybe this is a stupid question, but I could not solve it after some time of meditation. There are four different notions of regular categories: 1) A cartesian category with coequalizers of kernel ...
35
votes
1answer
1k views

What does it take to divide by $2$?

Theorem 1 [ZFC, classical logic]: If $A,B$ are sets such that $\textbf{2}\times A\cong \textbf{2}\times B$, then $A\cong B$. That's because the axiom of choice allows for the definition of ...
8
votes
1answer
177 views

Why are these two definitions of the left-adjoint to $u^p\colon PShv(D)\to PShv(C)$ equivalent?

Suppose $u\colon C\to D$ is a functor between categories. Then there is a functor $$ u^p\colon PShv(D)\to PShv(C) $$ between the associated presheaf categories by precomposition with $u$ as it is ...
5
votes
0answers
81 views

Some questions about synthetic differential geometry

I've been trying to read Kock's text on synthetic differential geometry but I am getting a bit confused. For example, what does it mean to "interpret set theory in a topos"? What is a model of a ...
2
votes
1answer
56 views

Why is the h-topology not subcanonical?

The h-topology introduced by Voevodsky on the category $Sch/K$ of separated schemes of finite type over a field $K$ is the Grothendieck topology associated with the pretopology whose coverings are of ...
15
votes
0answers
235 views

How much set theory does the category of sets remember?

Question. Let $M$ be a model of enough set theory. Then we can form a category $\mathbf{Set}_M$ whose objects are the elements of $M$ and whose morphisms are the functions in $M$. To what extent is ...
1
vote
1answer
94 views

Is a subobject classifier logically equivalent to set-inclusion?

Can one subsume the notion of set-inclusion $\subseteq$ and $\subset$ with the notion of a subobject classifier, expressed via an injective morphism $\hookrightarrow$? Specifically: Are the ...
1
vote
1answer
40 views

Is there a left adjoint to the inclusion of discrete (op)fibrations over $X$ into $\mathbf{Cat}/X$?

This would be intended to be like the adjoint to the inclusion of $Sub(X)$, the subsets of a set $X$ into $ \mathbf{Set}/X $, namely taking the image of a function--except "one level higher".
0
votes
1answer
57 views

etale sheafification of a presheaf

Consider the following presheaf on the big etale site of smooth schemes over a field $k$: to every smooth $k$-scheme $U$, associate $$F(U):= \{f: U \to \mathbb A^1_k ~|~ \text{$f$ factors through the ...
1
vote
2answers
61 views

Natural numbers object via initial morphism

I assume that a natural number object (or see nLab) can be defined as an initial morphisms. (edit: as in the title, I ment initial morphism, not objects) $\hspace{1cm}$ Thoughts: Probably $X:=1$, ...
2
votes
0answers
34 views

The closure of the graph of a certain composite in a topos.

Let $\mathcal{E}$ be an elementary topos with subobject classifier $\Omega$ and let $j\colon \Omega\to\Omega$ be a Lawvere-Tierney topology on it. Assume that, for an object $C$ of $\mathcal{E}$, each ...
5
votes
3answers
92 views

Where to study $2$-category theory?

Is there any place where I can read about $2$-categories? I am looking for a proper treatment - there is a section in Borceux's Handbook of Categorical Algebra, but it only sketches some parts of the ...
0
votes
2answers
79 views

Are there any stable $(\infty,1)$-topoi?

Can a stable $(\infty,1)$-category be an $(\infty,1)$-topos?
5
votes
2answers
453 views

What's the difference between a logic, an internal logic (language) of a category, an internal logic of a topos and a type theory?

maybe this question doesn't make sense at all. I don't know exactly the meaning of all these concepts, except the internal language of a topos (and searching on the literature is not helping at all). ...
0
votes
1answer
49 views

how would you define the term “elementary” in the context of categories and sets?

I was just reading P.T. Johnstone's introduction to his book "Topos Theory", where he uses the term "elementary" many times to classify the nature of theorems and definitions, examples below. I ...
5
votes
1answer
95 views

What makes “the topos $\mathbf{M}_2$” such a good counterexample?

I'd like to ask this question sooner rather than later; it might be a bit half-baked. So I'm sorry. It's just that there's a chance I'll be side-tracked from Topos Theory for a couple of months (with ...
1
vote
1answer
93 views

Arrows-only implication & disjunction in $\mathbf{Set}.$

Just before the truth-arrows in a topos subsection of Goldblatt's "Topoi: A Categorial Analysis of logic," descriptions of the truth functions $\Rightarrow$ and $\smallsmile$ are given in ...
1
vote
1answer
59 views

Strange monomorphism of sheaves

What is an example of a Grothendieck topology $J$ on a small category $\mathcal{C}$ such that the category of sheaves $\mathsf{Sh}(\mathcal{C},J)$ has a monomorphism which is not a monomorphism of ...
1
vote
1answer
39 views

Showing $f:a\to b$ is epic iff there exists some iso $g: f(a)\cong b$ with $g\circ f^*=f$.

This is Exercise 5.2.4 of Goldblatt's, "Topoi: A Categorial Analysis of Logic". In any topos, given $f:a\to b$, define $p, q: b\to r$ using the pullback of $f$ along itself like so ...
3
votes
1answer
86 views

Verifying a Construction Satisfies the $\Omega$-axiom.

I'm stuck on Exercise 4.5.1 of Goldblatt's, "Topoi: A Categorial Analysis of Logic". It's in the topos $\mathbf{Bn}(I)$ of bundles over a set $I$. Goldblatt asks the reader to verify that $\tag{1}$ ...
4
votes
0answers
60 views

Presheaves in a quasi-topos.

I do believe it is a trivial question. But unfortunately I don't know where I can find an answer. Where could I find the answer to the following question? If $S$ is a small category and $X$ is a ...
3
votes
0answers
42 views

Motivation of Strong Monics

Strong monics are defined as: A monic $m$ is strong iff every commutative square $mu=ve$, in $E$ with $e$ epi, has a diagonal i.e. there is a morphism $t$ such that $u=te$ and $v=mt$ in $E$. (where ...
3
votes
3answers
162 views

Learning the topology needed for topos theory.

I have just started learning topos theory and I am going through Mac Lane and Moerdijk's book, "Sheaves in Geometry and Logic". I have, unfortunately, very little experience with topology. I started ...
0
votes
0answers
102 views

Compare étale morphisms in Top and Schemes

Perhaps because I find the algebraic definition of ├ętale morphisms (of schemes) hard to approach, I'm trying to bootstrap from my understanding of ├ętale morphisms of topological spaces. In topological ...
7
votes
2answers
145 views

The dense topology

The definition of the dense topology confuses me. If $C$ is a category and $X \in C$, a sieve $S$ on $X$ is a covering for the dense topology iff for every $f : Y \to X$ there is some morphism $g : Z ...
2
votes
0answers
58 views

dense generators and left Kan extensions

Here is an exercise from Borceux, Handbook of Categorical Algebra I, p 174: Consider a category $\mathfrak{C}$, a family $(G_i)_{i \in I}$ of objects of $\mathfrak{C}$ and the corresponding full ...
5
votes
1answer
115 views

Are there any non-trivial finite elementary topoi?

Title basically says it all: are there any finite topoi (that is, finite set of objects, finite hom-objects) other than $\textbf{1}$ (the terminal category) and $\textbf{2}$ (the category $\ast ...
6
votes
1answer
86 views

A few questions concerning “universal colimits” and dense generating sets

My questions are triggered by Borceux, Vol 1, Proposition 4.5.6. The relevant part of the book is browsable on Google Books, but i'll go ahead and reproduce at least the statement here anyway: Let ...
2
votes
0answers
71 views

Studying Galois Cohomology from Category Theory.

I am a masters student with background in Category Theory - I also know some Topos Theory. I would like to ask if you think it would be possible to start studying Galois Cohomology without any ...
4
votes
1answer
64 views

Quantificators vs pullbacks

Let $\mathscr C$ be a cartesian category with subobject classifier $\Omega$ and generic subobject $\tau:I\to\Omega$. Consider the following pullback square: $\require{AMScd} \begin{CD} P @>{\bar ...
3
votes
4answers
82 views

How do you work with infinitesimal exponents in synthetic differential geometry?

I just read this paper by Andrej Bauer, which discusses the basic tenets of synthetic differential geometry. Namely, that for any function $f$, any real number $x$, and any infinitesimal $\epsilon$ (a ...
0
votes
1answer
34 views

Surjection Vs Surjective geometric morphism

Is it true that a map between ${\bf T1}$ topological spaces $f:X \to Y$ is surjective iff the induced geometric morphism $f:Sh(Y) \to Sh(X)$ is a surjection (i.e. its inverse image part $f^*$ is ...
1
vote
1answer
118 views

Toposes and Stone-type dualities

The duality between the category Sets and the category CABool of complete atomic boolean algebras is an example of a general Stone-type duality. At the same time, Sets is a topos. Are there other ...
2
votes
2answers
44 views

Precomposition with a faithful functor

If $F: C \rightarrow D$ is a faithful functor, then is the precomposition with $F$ functor $F^{\star}:[D:\mathbf{Set}] \rightarrow [C:\mathbf{Set}]$ faithful?
2
votes
2answers
81 views

How do you see that this diagram is a pullback square?

I am trying to understand why the left-hand square of the diagram below (in a topos) is a pullback, where $\Delta_B$ is the diagonal map, $\delta_B$ is clearly the characteristic map of $\Delta _B$ ...