This tag is intended for questions concerning partial orders, equivalence relations, properties of relations (transitive, symmetric,...), composition of relations and similar stuff. More-or-less the things about relations taught in the first elementary set theory or discrete math course.

learn more… | top users | synonyms

71
votes
12answers
11k views

Are there real-life relations which are symmetric and reflexive but not transitive?

Inspired by Halmos (Naive Set Theory) . . . For each of these three possible properties [reflexivity, symmetry, and transitivity], find a relation that does not have that property but does have ...
28
votes
3answers
2k views

Why isn't reflexivity redundant in the definition of equivalence relation?

An equivalence relation is defined by three properties: reflexivity, symmetry and transitivity. Doesn't symmetry and transitivity implies reflexivity? Consider the following argument. For any $a$ ...
12
votes
4answers
186 views

Does “=” have to be interpreted as equality?

To put it briefly: In model theory, we are allowed to interpret any relation symbol in any way we like. So why do people seem to require that "$=$" is interpreted as the actual equality? Let me ...
12
votes
2answers
336 views

When does “pairwise” strengthen and when does it weaken?

"Pairwise disjoint" is stronger than "disjoint"; it sometimes happens that $\displaystyle\bigcap\limits_{i\in I} A_i=\varnothing$ but for every $i,j$, or at least for some, one has $A_i \cap ...
11
votes
1answer
258 views

Can we extend the definition of a continuous function to binary relations?

Let $X,Y$ be topological spaces. A function $\phi:X\to Y$ is continuous iff for any open subset $A\subseteq Y,$ the preimage $\phi^{-1}(A)$ is open in $X.$ We could similarly define a relation ...
9
votes
4answers
339 views

A problem about symmetric relations on finite sets.

We have these assumptions: $X$ is a finite set. $\sim$ is an irreflexive symmetric relation on $X$. for any subset $Y\subseteq X$ we define $$\mathcal{Cl}(Y)=\{A\subseteq Y\mid(\forall a,b\in ...
9
votes
2answers
140 views

Question from 'How to Prove It'

Below is the question from the book mentioned above: Suppose $f : A \rightarrow B$ and $R$ is an equivalence relation on $A$. We will say that $f$ is compatible with $R$ if $∀x \in A\forall y ∈ ...
8
votes
4answers
762 views

Is any relation which contains only one ordered pair transitive?

I need clarification. Let $A=\{1,2,3\}$ be a set and $R=\{(1,2)\}$ be a relation on $A$. Is it a Transitive relation? I am confused because some text books say $R$ is transitive if it contains only ...
8
votes
1answer
620 views

What is meant by “m|n”? Two letters separated by a vertical bar (|)

I am new to this subject, and not not sure what "|" symbol means on this statement. Let $R_2 \subset\Bbb N \times\Bbb N$ be defined by $(m, n) \in R_2$ if and only if $m|n$.
8
votes
3answers
172 views

Can we take images of equivalence relations?

Given a function $f : X \rightarrow Y$, it is well-known that we can take the image under $f$ of any subset $A \subseteq X$, and we can take the preimage under $f$ of any subset $A \subseteq Y$. This ...
8
votes
1answer
228 views

How to prove an extension of ZFC is conservative

Working in ZFC. I've defined a function-like binary predicate $R$ on a proper class. It has to be recursive; i.e. $R(a,b)$ must usually depend on one or more $R(c,d)$ for some $c$s and $d$s ...
7
votes
5answers
694 views

Dependence of Axioms of Equivalence Relation?

This question is problem 11(a) in chapter 1 in 'Topics in Algebra' by I.N. Herstein. These are the properties of equivalence relation given in this book. Prop 1 $a \sim a$ Prop 2 $a \sim b$ ...
7
votes
2answers
157 views

Is there a name for relations with this property?

Is there a name for relations $\rho : X \rightarrow Y$ such that for all $x,x' \in X$ and all $y,y' \in Y$ we have that the following conditions $$xy \in \rho$$ $$x'y \in \rho$$ $$xy' \in \rho$$ imply ...
7
votes
1answer
239 views

Can we extend the definition of a homomorphism to binary relations?

This is going to be quite a long post. The actual questions will be at the end of it in section "Questions." INTRODUCTION After receiving an answer to this question about extending the definition of ...
6
votes
10answers
2k views

I need a relation which is not reflexive, not symmetric, and not transitive

I need an example of a relation which is simultaneously not reflexive, not symmetric, and not transitive. Any accessible examples? Thanks in advance.
6
votes
10answers
422 views

Sanity check, is $\{(-9,-3),(2,-1),(7,7),(-1,-1)\}$ a function?

EDIT#2: Yes, I'm crazy! This IS a function. Thanks for beating the correct logic into me everyone! I'm using a website provided by my algebra textbook that has questions and answers. It has the ...
6
votes
4answers
3k views

Understanding equivalence class, equivalence relation, partition

Im having difficulty grasping a couple of set theory concepts, specifically concepts dealing with relations. Here are the ones I'm having trouble with and their definitions. 1) The collection of ...
6
votes
2answers
752 views

What is the difference between Categories and Relations?

For a common basis, I'll state basic definitions of a category and the relation type I'm thinking of. They're here for quick clarity, not precision, so feel free to revise for an answer. Category: A ...
6
votes
2answers
966 views

Can a relation with less than 3 elements be considered transitive?

The generalize rule for a transitive relation is a -> b b -> c therefor a -> c If an element has less than 3 elements, can it still be transitive? If ...
6
votes
1answer
366 views

The relation “is strictly higher than” is considered antisymmetric?

I'm studying from Michael Carter's "Foundations" and in the answer key to exercise 1.15 he says that with regard to mountain peaks the relation "is strictly higher than" is antisymmetric. In other ...
6
votes
3answers
6k views

Transitive Relations

For example, $$R = \{ (1,1),(1,2),(2,1),(2,2) \} \quad\text{for}\quad A = \{1,2,3\}.$$ This relation is symmetric and transitive. I understand that the relation is symmetric, but my brain does not ...
6
votes
2answers
299 views

Is there a relation that is irreflexive, anti-symmetric and not transitive?

from the set $\{a, b, c, d\}$? Of the one's I have tried, it at best is two of the three, but never all.
6
votes
2answers
3k views

If a relation is symmetric and transitive, will it be reflexive? [duplicate]

Possible Duplicate: Why isn't reflexivity redundant in the definition of equivalence relation? We had a heated discussion in class today and i still cant be sure if the professor was ...
6
votes
2answers
196 views

Notation for a relation

I'm reading up on "Set Theory and Logic" by Stoll and came upon notation for relations that I haven't seen before. I've seen $x\sim{y},$ and $xRy$ before but Stoll uses this one. $$(x,y)\in{\rho}$$ ...
6
votes
3answers
175 views

Unambiguous terminology for domains, ranges, sources and targets.

Given a correspondence $f : X \rightarrow Y$ (which may or may not be a function) I generally use the following terminology. $X$ is the source of $f$ $Y$ is the target $\{x \in X \mid \exists y \in ...
6
votes
3answers
132 views

Abuse of notation in declaring a variable is a function of another?

The standard way to write $ \text{ y is a function of x} $ is $ y = f(x) $ This is taken to mean that $y$ is the value of function $f$ evaluated at $x$. For simplicity let's take $f$ to be some ...
5
votes
7answers
562 views

Branch of math studying relations

There are many branches of mathematics (analysis, algebra, group theory, logic, ...). Now, I'm interested in relations and their special kinds (like equivalence relation) and their properties. I'd ...
5
votes
3answers
280 views

Do there exist interesting binary relations satisfying reflexivity and symmetry, but not transitivity?

Given the usual set-theoretic definition of a binary relation[1], along with the usual notions of reflexivity symmetry transitivity Do there exist any interesting (i.e. surprising, yielding novel ...
5
votes
3answers
829 views

Why is the empty set finite?

On page 25 of Principles of Mathematical Analysis (ed. 3) by Rudin, there is the definition (excluding the irrelevant parts for this question): Definition 2.4: For any positive integer $n$, let ...
5
votes
3answers
146 views

Is $\varsigma$ equivalence relation?

Let $\varsigma$ be a relation on $\wp(\mathbb{N})$ by defining $\langle A,B\rangle\in \varsigma$ iff exist natural $n$ such that $|A\Delta B|=n$. Is $\varsigma$ equivalence relation? Reflexive: For ...
5
votes
3answers
171 views

Determine if the following is a partial order, and if so, is it a total order?

I'm having trouble figuring out how I can solve this... I've never been good with formal proofs. $$(\mathbb{R},\preceq), a\preceq b\iff a^{2}\leq b^{2}$$ I can easily see that it's Reflexive: ...
5
votes
4answers
294 views

Can functions be defined by relations?

So let us say that for whatever reasons, we are not allowed to use function symbols in first-order logic. Then can we define and use a function only by relations?
5
votes
2answers
161 views

Main Theorems/Techniques for proving Homeomorphism?

General Question: what are the most common Theorems/Methods used to prove Homeomorphism? I encountered: - find the map explicitly - use the Compact-to-Hausdorff Lemma - find cts maps $f$ and $g$ ...
5
votes
5answers
537 views

Interesting properties of ternary relations?

Many people are familiar with some properties of binary relations, such as reflexivity, symmetry and transitivity. What are the commonly studied properties of ternary (3-ary) relations? If you ...
5
votes
3answers
3k views

Is there a relation which is neither symmetric nor antisymmetric?

I've proved that there are relations which are both symmetric and antisymmetric ($\forall a \forall b (aRb \rightarrow (a=b))$) and now I'm trying to prove that there are relations which are neither ...
5
votes
2answers
157 views

On the Definition of Posets…

In my book, the author defines posets formally in the following way: Let $P$ be a set, and let $\le$ be a relationship on $P$ so that, $a$. $\le$ is reflective. $b$. $\le$ is transitive. $c$. ...
5
votes
2answers
465 views

Cardinality of relations set

I was thinking about cardinality of all symmetric relations, for example in $\mathbb{Z}$. I know, that if I have finite set (which contains $n$ elements), there are $2^{\frac{n(n+1)}{2}}$ symmetric ...
5
votes
2answers
31 views

Two functions whose order can't be equated - big O notation

Our teacher talked today in the class about big O notation, and about order relations. she mentioned that the set of order of magnitude, is not linear Meaning, there are function $f,g$ such that $f$ ...
5
votes
1answer
278 views

Is this alternative definition of 'equivalence relation' well-known? useful? used?

I discovered that $$R \textrm{ is an equivalence relation on } A \;\equiv\; \langle \forall a,b \in A :: aRb \:\equiv\: \langle \forall x \in A :: aRx \equiv bRx\rangle \rangle$$ The nice thing about ...
5
votes
1answer
63 views

Question about sets of well-orders and isomorphisms between well-orders

I was thinking about this problem in trying to better get a feel for and understand well-orders (I'm trying to learn some set theory) - right now, I'm not really hoping for anybody to supply me with a ...
5
votes
3answers
340 views

Equivalence class of polynomials

$X$ is the set of all polynomials over $\mathbb{R}$. We define an equivalence relation on $X$ such that $p$~$q$ iff $p(0)=q(0)$. ($1$) What is the equivalence class of $p(x)=x$? ($2$) Give a ...
5
votes
1answer
65 views

Why is this binary-relation antisymmetric?

Definition of antisymmetric binary-relation is $$\forall a,b\in\mathrm{A},\left[ \left(aRb\wedge bRa\right)\rightarrow\left(a=b\right)\right].$$ Let $\mathrm{A}=\left\{a\mid ...
5
votes
2answers
300 views

Ordering the field of real rational functions

Perusing the Wikipedia article on ordered fields, I encountered an interesting statement, a variation of which I am now trying to prove. Basically, I am trying to show that the set of real rational ...
5
votes
2answers
455 views

Sets, functions and relations problem

Yes this is a homework problem but I have attempted to solve it and my work is below, also this is my first question here so I'm sorry for any mistakes: Question: Context: Let $A$ and $B$ be subsets ...
5
votes
0answers
74 views

Is there a standard name for the relation $X \times Y$?

Given sets $X$ and $Y$, is there a standard name for the relation $f : X \rightarrow Y$ whose graph equals $X \times Y$? Something like the full/maximum/top/total/complete relation?
4
votes
5answers
5k views

Number of relations that are both symmetric and reflexive

Consider a non-empty set A containing n objects. How many relations on A are both symmetric and reflexive? The answer to this is $2^p$ where $p=$ $n \choose 2$. However, I dont understand why this is ...
4
votes
3answers
844 views

Why is $y = \sqrt{x-4}$ a function? and $y = \sqrt{4 - x^2}$ should be a circle

So why is it a function, even though for example $x = 8$; you'll have $y = +2$ and $y = -2$. It'll fail the vertical line test. But every textbook considers it as a function. Did I misunderstand ...
4
votes
2answers
266 views

The fibres of a map form a partition of the domain.

This is a question from the free Harvard online abstract algebra lectures. I'm posting my solutions here to get some feedback on them. For a fuller explanation, see this post. This problem is from ...
4
votes
2answers
112 views

Equivalence relations on classes instead of sets

Can someone please explain to me how to deal with equivalence relations on classes instead of sets? Is there some sort of generalisation of relations? Thank you
4
votes
3answers
116 views

Why is Transitivity necessary in the definition in the definition of an order on a set?

In Rudin, Principles of Mathematical Analysis (ed. 3), he provides the following definition (pp. 3) Definition: Let $S$ be a set. An order on $S$ is a relation, denoted by $<$, with the ...