Questions about truth tables, conjunctive and disjunctive normal forms, negation, and implication of unquantified propositions would fit very nicely under this tag. Questions about other kind of logics should be tagged with [logic] instead.

learn more… | top users | synonyms (1)

0
votes
1answer
28 views

Proving an “OR” statement

If one wants to proof $P\vee Q$, is it sufficient to proof $\lnot P \rightarrow Q$? Because it makes intuitively more sense to me that $P\vee Q$ would be logically equivalent with $(\lnot P ...
2
votes
2answers
60 views

Principle of explosion: Other arguments?

I've come across a proof-theoretic argument for explosion on Wikipedia, which is as follows: $A \ \ \wedge\sim A$ $A$ $ \sim A$ $ A \lor B$ $B$ $(A \ \ \wedge \sim A) \implies B$ I've thought of ...
0
votes
3answers
15 views

Propositional logic problem: Sales, expenses and happiness of the boss

Either sales will go up and the boss will be happy, or expenses will go up and the boss won’t be happy. Therefore, sales and expenses will not both go up. I know the solution is that the ...
0
votes
3answers
70 views

If A implies B and C implies B, do A and C together imply B? [on hold]

If A implies B and C implies B, do A and C together imply B? I need a clarification regarding this question.
3
votes
2answers
28 views

Difference between “necessary” and “necessary but not sufficient”?

This is from Discrete Mathematics and Its Applications: Let $p, q,$ and $r$ be the propositions: $\quad p:$ Grizzly bears have been seen in the area. $\quad q:$ Hiking is safe on the ...
0
votes
2answers
61 views

Can anyone help me with a solution? [on hold]

Write down the assumptions in a form of clauses and give a resolution proof that the proposition $$\Big((p \rightarrow q) \land ( q \rightarrow r) \land p \Big) ...
0
votes
1answer
23 views

Expressing the converse, contra-positive, and inverse of conditional statements

This problem is from Discrete Mathematics and its Applications Here is my book's definition on converse, contrapositive, and inverse And the common ways to express an implication For this ...
1
vote
3answers
313 views

Is there a quicker way to check if this proposition is self contradictory?

I have been trying to refresh my memory with regards to classical logic. As a result, I am currently going over the basics. The following proposition seems to be false in all possible worlds. ...
0
votes
2answers
55 views

Can someone verify my assertion from this english sentence? [duplicate]

This is from Discrete Mathematics and its Applications This is the book means when mentions a list of common ways to express conditional statements After going through the list, I immediately ...
0
votes
1answer
26 views

Need to prove that a conditional statement is a tautology

The conditional statement is $[(p \rightarrow q) \land (q \rightarrow r)] \rightarrow (p \rightarrow r)$ Here are the steps I took in an attempt to prove the above statement a tautology, but I ...
2
votes
1answer
37 views

Show that the conditional statement is a tautology without using a truth table

I have been attempting to use identities to get to the answer but I am unable to get anywhere. Here is the equation I am trying to prove tautological without using truth tables: $[(p\rightarrow q) ...
0
votes
0answers
18 views

Is it necessary to write out the whole truth table to show system specification is consistent?

This is an example from Discrete Mathematics and its Applications Basically the way I see this problem is "is there a combination of propositions that will make all of these specifications true". ...
2
votes
1answer
33 views

odd logical structures

How you find contrapositive and converse of these sentences. Only if John chops down the tree, will he be a lumberjack. You can't win if you don't fight. All people that root for the Ducks are from ...
1
vote
2answers
40 views

Propositional Logic : Absorption - Why is it so?

Why is the Absorption Law of Propositional Logic so ? p $\lor (p \land q) \equiv$ p Would appreciate an intuitive explanation and not one using a Truth Table
3
votes
2answers
35 views

Is my deduction of $t$ being true logically correct?

According to the problem on my homework (yes, this is my homework), number 42 in chapter 2.3 of Discrete Mathematics with Applications by Susanna S. Epp, the following are true: \begin{align} ...
1
vote
1answer
32 views

Use logical equivalencies to classify as tautology, contradiction, or contingency.

Classify the following as tautologies, contradictions or contingencies using logical equivalences. Can anyone let me know what I'm missing or doing wrong? I got stuck, here is what I have so far: ...
0
votes
1answer
92 views

Verify these logical equivalences by writing an equivalence proof?

I have two parts to this question - I need to verify each of the following by writing an equivalence proof: $p \to (q \land r) \equiv (p \to q) \land (p \to r)$ $(p \to q) \land (p \lor q) \equiv q$ ...
1
vote
1answer
403 views

proof of validity of tautology in first order logic

Every first-order logic formula which has a tautological shape in propositional logic is a valid formula. Will it be possible to give a formal proof for the above ? Thanks and Regards.
1
vote
4answers
106 views

Necessary but not sufficient in logic

I am working through sample questions and am having a bit of trouble understanding the solution. Write using logical connectives: p : Grizzly bears have been seen in the area. q : Hiking is safe on ...
1
vote
5answers
309 views

Which can be logically inferred from the given statements?

All women are entrepreneurs. Some women are doctors. Which of the following conclusions can be logically inferred from the above statements? (A) All women are doctors. (B) All doctors are ...
0
votes
0answers
29 views

Expansion Of A algebric term

While doing a coding for software I fell upon in the need to expand the following expression $(A \land B) \land (C \land (D \lor (E \land f)) \land (g \lor h \lor i))$ I tried it and result I got is ...
2
votes
2answers
40 views

Associativity and De Morgan's for more than 2 literals

Do logical operators have meaning when used with more than 2 literals "associatively", e.g.: $(A \land B \land C)$? I.e., are statements such as $(A \land B \land C)$ meaningful, as opposed to $((A ...
1
vote
1answer
32 views

Are these two statements logically equivalent?

Are the statements $D \Rightarrow H \vee S$ and $(D \Rightarrow H) \vee (D \Rightarrow S)$ logically equivalent?
3
votes
1answer
32 views

prove that $\Sigma \vdash \phi_1$ and $\Sigma \vdash \phi_2$ leads to $\Sigma \vdash \phi_1 \wedge \phi_2$.

I try to prove that if $\Sigma \vdash \phi_1$ and $\Sigma \vdash \phi_2$ then $\Sigma \vdash \phi_1 \wedge \phi_2$. Notice that, the ONLY rule of inference of the system is modes ponens and the set ...
0
votes
2answers
47 views

Discrete Math - Determine if the argument is valid

Can you guys please check my work and syntax. Question: Determine if the argument is valid. p $\rightarrow $ q $\underline{\urcorner{q}}$ $\therefore \urcorner$p Answer: T $\rightarrow $ T ...
0
votes
0answers
76 views

Truth Tables in Real Life

Are truth tables something that can be used in real life, or are they merely something that philosophers would have used? And by real life I mean outside of mathematics. I already know that we use ...
-1
votes
1answer
88 views

Proving each conditional statement is a tautology

I'm having trouble trying to show that each of the conditional statement below is a tautology without using a truth table. I'm assuming you would have to use logical equivalence to figure this out. I ...
2
votes
1answer
31 views

Partial truth table and proving or disproving tautology

Let $p,q$ be elementry statements and $\alpha,\beta,\gamma$ be statements. (sorry if this is the wrong translation). Prove/disprove: is $p,q\Rightarrow \gamma$ tautology? is ...
4
votes
3answers
4k views

Problem in understanding p implies q

I am trying to understand what “$p$ implies $q$” means. I read that $p$ is a sufficient condition for $q$, and $q$ is a necessary condition for $p$. Further from Wikipedia, A ...
1
vote
1answer
28 views

Logically determining the validity of a statement

I'm having some trouble determining if the following statement may be considered valid. if the apples are on sale, I will buy the apples. the apples are not on sale. ∴ I will not buy the apples. ...
1
vote
1answer
72 views

Need help understanding discrete mathematics logic

I am having a heck of a time understanding Discrete Mathematics. I have tried this myself and put my answer below. If anyone could help me if my answer is incorrect could you please explain to me what ...
2
votes
2answers
62 views

Notation or verbiage for the opposite of 'iff'? [duplicate]

Given the statement $X \implies Y$ and $Y \implies X$, we have the common notation $X \iff Y$. Ok so is there an opposite of this concept? Suppose I have $X$ doesn't imply $Y$, nor does $Y$ imply ...
0
votes
2answers
28 views

Logical disjunction truth table

The truth table for a logical disjunction shows that there is only one situation where the result can be false, being when both statements are false. As long as one statement is true, the result is ...
0
votes
2answers
2k views

Proving/Disproving Product of two irrational number is irrational

I saw this question where I had to prove/disprove that: Ques. Product of two irrational number is irrational. I tried 'Proof by Contraposition'. Product of two irrational number is irrational. p ...
2
votes
2answers
86 views

Are the following logically equivalent? $\;p \rightarrow (q \rightarrow r) \text{ and }\ (p \rightarrow q) \rightarrow r$

Determine whether the following pair of statements are logically equivalent or not... $$p \rightarrow (q \rightarrow r) \;\;\text{ and }\;\; (p \rightarrow q) \rightarrow r$$ I am new to logic ...
-3
votes
1answer
94 views

Determine whether {⇒, ¬} is functionally complete. [closed]

Show that {⇒, ¬} is functionally complete. And also show that ⇒ is not functionally complete. I'm quite stumped on this one, any help appreciated. Thanks
-1
votes
1answer
17 views

How to identify invalid proposition

In propositional logic, how do i identify if a [compound/non-compound] proposition is valid or not? do the parenthesis matter, even if they start and do not end etc...? for example: ...
11
votes
8answers
10k views

In classical logic, why is $(p\Rightarrow q)$ True if $p$ is False and $q$ is True?

Provided we have this truth table where "$p\implies q$" means "if $p$ then $q$": $$\begin{array}{|c|c|c|} \hline p&q&p\implies q\\ \hline T&T&T\\ T&F&F\\ F&T&T\\ ...
42
votes
17answers
4k views

In classical logic, why is $(p\Rightarrow q)$ True if both $p$ and $q$ are False?

I am studying entailment in classical first-order logic. The Truth Table we have been presented with for the statement $(p \Rightarrow q)\;$ (a.k.a. '$p$ implies $q$') is: ...
2
votes
4answers
4k views

How do I prove the transitivity of a set of implications?

If I have a set of implications, how can I prove the transitivity? In other words: I know the transitivity law, but I need to show on paper for an assignment whether the argument is valid or not. $$ ...
3
votes
0answers
60 views

Is the following derivation of Gödel's Paradox generalizable to an intuitionistic one using provability?

I will follow Goedel's original proof of Goedel's paradox located on pg. 264 of Hao Wang's A Logical Journey: From Gödel to Philosophy. With this in sight, and to also avoid confusion, I will also ...
0
votes
1answer
40 views

Is the Cardinality of the Set of Contingent Propositions the Same as the Cardinality of the Set of Tautologies?

Is the Cardinality of the Set of Contingent Propositions the Same as the Cardinality of the Set of Tautologies? By a "contingent proposition" I mean a proposition which is neither a tautology or ...
2
votes
2answers
2k views

What is Validity and Satisfiability in a propositional statement?

I tend to see these words a lot in Discrete Mathematics. I assumed these were just simple words until I bumped into a question. Is the following proposition Satisfiable? Is it Valid? $(P ...
1
vote
1answer
63 views

Complicated FOL Formula {∃a,c(a≠c) ∧ ∀a,c[(a≠c)⇒(h(a,c)⟺ ¬h(c,a))] ∧ ∀a,c[h(a,c) ⇒ ∃b(h(a,b)∧h(b,c)∧b≠c)]} ⇒ ¬{∃a∀b[b≠a⇒ h(a,b)]}

In preparing for an exam, I'm working through old exam questions and am now trying to figure out if the following first-order formula is valid and if not, then give a model that does not satisfy the ...
4
votes
1answer
44 views

Show that $\Gamma \cup \{\neg \phi\}$ is satisfiable if and only if $\Gamma\not \models \phi$

Let $\Gamma$ be a set of formulas and $\phi$ be a formula. Show that $\Gamma \cup \{\neg \phi\}$ is satisfiable if and only if $\Gamma\not \models \phi$. This seemed pretty obvious but I wanted ...
2
votes
1answer
73 views

How to show $\vdash (\neg\neg p \rightarrow p)$.

Given these axioms: where $\phi, \psi, \theta$ are formulas $$ 1.:(\psi \rightarrow (\theta \rightarrow \psi))$$ $$ 2.: ((\neg \psi \rightarrow \neg \theta) \rightarrow (\theta \rightarrow \psi))$$ ...
0
votes
2answers
19 views

simplification of a propositional statement

Write the formula which is equivalent to the formula $$\neg (p\leftrightarrow(q\to(r \lor p)))$$ and contains the connectives AND ( $\land$ ) and NEGATION ( $\neg$ ) only.
1
vote
1answer
31 views

If $\Sigma$ satisfies $\alpha$ and also not-$\alpha$ then $\Sigma$ is not satisfiable?

Why is it true that if $\Sigma$ satisfies $\alpha$ and also not-$\alpha$ then $\Sigma$ is not satisfiable? Is it true at all? it doesn't make any sense to me and I would like to know more about that ...
0
votes
4answers
612 views

Prove that $\vdash p \lor \lnot p$ is true using natural deduction

I'm trying to prove that $p \lor \lnot p$ is true using natural deduction. I want to do this without using any premises. As it's done in a second using a truth table and because it is so intuitive, I ...
0
votes
1answer
51 views

How to prove this using natural deduction

⊢ P ∨ ¬P I found this question on the net. I know the solution but i find it complicated. How should i approach to this sort of question? Or can you provide me another solution ?