Proof theory is an area of logic that studies proof as formal mathematical objects. For questions asking how to write proofs or for checking an informal proof, please use the proof-writing or proof-strategy tags instead.

learn more… | top users | synonyms

0
votes
2answers
18 views

Proof by contradiction how to show is properly

For every $x \in \left[\pi/2,\pi\right]\,,\ \sin\left(x\right) − \cos\left(x\right) \geq 1$. I have drawn the graph and can clearly see that A is true however how do I prove it correctly.
5
votes
1answer
157 views

What is the proof-theoretic ordinal of the first-order theory of real closed fields?

I recently asked a question on MathOverflow, concerning a predicative second-order theory of real numbers. Now the standard way of developing predicativity in the case of second-order arithmetic is ...
4
votes
1answer
164 views

What are those “things that cannot be proved using only ordinary rules of inference”?

The online edition of the book Introduction to Logic by Michael Genesereth and Eric Kao, has a detail that left me confused. CHAPTER 4 [...] 4.2 Linear Proofs [...] The ...
4
votes
1answer
121 views

Curry-Howard Correspondence (Proof Theory)

As you all know, the Curry-Howard correspondance provides a link between type theory and predicate logic. Concepts featured in the former, such as $\Pi$-type and $\Sigma$-type can, by the ...
2
votes
1answer
150 views

What if 'proof by contradiction' is not a valid method of proof?

I've just been reading this question about the existence (or lack thereof) of contradictions in maths. I've been wondering: What if 'proof by contradiction' is not a valid method to (dis)prove a ...
2
votes
1answer
48 views

Are there statments which do not have a constructive proof?

I understand that a lot of statements are just non-nonconstructive in nature (like negative statements), and I understand that a lot of statements are not provable without the axiom of choice. ...
1
vote
1answer
67 views

Infinitely many proofs?

While compiling a list of my favorite proofs of the infinitude of primes, the following came to mind; Proposition: There are infinitely many non-isomorphic proofs of the infinitude of primes. I'm ...
1
vote
1answer
395 views

proof of validity of tautology in first order logic

Every first-order logic formula which has a tautological shape in propositional logic is a valid formula. Will it be possible to give a formal proof for the above ? Thanks and Regards.
0
votes
1answer
40 views

Did I do this big-Omega proof correctly?

Prove or disprove: 6n^3 – 4n^2 + 3n +2 is in Ω (5n^3 – n^2 + n +1). So I'm not sure if I did this right or not, any pointers or the correct steps would be helpful Ǝc ∈ ℝ+, ƎB ∈ ℕ, ∀n ∈ ℕ, n ≥ B ⇒ ...
0
votes
1answer
20 views

Proving Properties in Ordered Fields

Refer to Definition 1.3, which states, an ordered field is a field F that is ordered set with the following additional properties: ...
0
votes
1answer
30 views

Cartesian product proof with counterexample

I was asked to disprove the following statement by counterexample: Let A, B and C be sets. If A x C = B x C then A = B I was under the impression that: (x1, y1) = (x2, y2) if and only if x1 = x2 and ...
0
votes
1answer
18 views

Proving order of magnitude

Generally how much proof must be given to prove a statement of order-of-magnitude? for example: $n^2 + 2 log (n) = O(n^2)$ $2 log (n)$ has a lower order of magnitude than $n^2$ so it can be argued ...
0
votes
1answer
56 views

particular property and completeness?

I was puzzeling with the almost standard definition of completeness: In mathematical logic and metalogic, a formal system is called complete with respect to a particular property if every formula ...
0
votes
1answer
105 views

Hilbert calculus: Proof that every provable formula has a proof

For my indroduction to logic course I have to proof, that every provable formula has a proof. It sounds first very funny, second also very logic, still I don't get to make of formally work.. The ...
0
votes
1answer
19 views

Struggling with proof, by contrapositive?

I am having trouble solving this proof. I tried to do a proof by contrapositive. Q = $(u+z)/(v+w) < z/w$ P = $(u/v < x/y \land x/y < z/w)$ Assuming $\lnot Q$ got me: $u/v \ge z/w$ ...
3
votes
0answers
50 views

Using an automatic tool for checking geometric conjectures

I do a lot of research about squares, and I thought of using some automatic tool for proving / disproving some geometric conjectures. As a simple example, consider the following Square coloring ...
2
votes
0answers
64 views

How much arithmetic can Predicative Second-Order EFA do?

As discussed in this MathOverflow question, I'm trying to find what the result would be of applying a Feferman-Scutte-like analysis to the predicativism of Edward Nelson and Charles Parsons, who ...
2
votes
0answers
191 views

Difference between soundness and correctness

Is there any actual semantic difference between soundness and correctness? Can I use these words interchangeably when talking about formal reasoning, proof, logics, etc.? Otherwise, is there a ...
1
vote
0answers
25 views

How to check homeomorphic embedding relation programmatically?

This is a follow up to this question and Deedlit's answer. I'm looking for a precise definition of the "hem?" (tree A homeomorphically embeddable in tree B?) relation, preferably in terms of a ...
1
vote
0answers
28 views

How far can-I rewrite in lambda functions?

I am quite new with the lambda calculus. I am experimenting lambda-calculus proofs through the coq proof assistant, but the question I have is not related to coq (I guess). However, I'm going to use ...
1
vote
0answers
57 views

Is a sentence in $\Pi_1$ true given $Q \vdash \lnot\varphi$?

If $Q \vdash \lnot\varphi$ (Q is the Robinson arithmetic), and if I assume that $\varphi \in \Pi_1$; Can I say that $\varphi$ is a true sentence? My thoughts are that, given that Q is $\Sigma_1$- ...
1
vote
0answers
93 views

Do we know that if $\pi$ is normal then there is a proof of it?

We do not know whether $\pi$ is normal or it is not and many other weaker statements, e.g. (*) $\pi$ contains infinitely many $0$s. Inspired by the Godel's incompleteness theorem that there are some ...
1
vote
0answers
39 views

A question about $KP + V = L$ and $KP$ set theory.

In reading Rathjen (Choice principles in constructive set theories) and Jager (On Feferman's OST) I've come across two facts that are taken as obvious/well known, and probably are, but for which I ...
1
vote
0answers
32 views

Girard's System $F$ (also named Polymorphism)

I have been studying Girard's Polymorphism and a question came to my mind: why is it (also) called system $F$? Where does the $F$ come from? (i searched it online but didn't get any luck...)
1
vote
0answers
54 views

What is the proof-theoretic strength of the predicative second-order theory of real numbers?

The first-order theory of real numbers, AKA the theory of real closed fields, is obtained by added to the axioms for ordered fields an axiom schema of completeness, which states that for each formula ...
1
vote
0answers
81 views

proof checking machine vs. provability checking machine

Let M be a proof-checking Turing machine which takes two inputs, A and B. : M(A,B) = 0 if A codes a valid proof of the sentence coded by B in ZFC. M(A,B) = 1 if A does not code a valid proof of the ...
1
vote
0answers
72 views

Examining every mathematical result in purely formal, ZFC language.

My main interest is physics. However, being self-taught in mathematics for the most part, my proofs tend to be more intuitive than it is acceptable. Yet, I recognize my inaptitude in rigor, and I ...
0
votes
0answers
21 views

prove corollary to the Universal Non-Euclidean Theorem?

For any line l and any point P not on l, there are infinitely many lines through P parallel to l. In the proof of the theorem, the choice of point X on m uniquely determines the line PS. Show that ...
0
votes
0answers
27 views

How Do I Show that Condensed Derivable Rules of Inference Yield the Same Formula as Using Condendensed Detachment Multiple Times?

If we look at condensed detachment of two formulas $\alpha$ and $\beta$, we can see that D$\alpha$.$\beta$, where $\alpha$ has form C$\alpha$$_a$$\alpha$$_b$ is equivalent to using the rule ...
0
votes
0answers
44 views

Proof of law of reflection using Fermat's principle : are we really proving the law of reflection?

Before you skip reading this, let me tell you that this isn't a "how to derive the law of reflection using Fermat's principle" question. Also, I asked it on MSE instead of the physics site because ...
0
votes
0answers
69 views

Proof by contradiction and order of statements

Order matters, take sequences tending towards a limit: $$\forall\epsilon>0\exists N\in\mathbb{N}:n>N\implies|x_n-L|<\epsilon$$ "For all $\epsilon$ there exists an $N$" is totally different to ...
0
votes
0answers
49 views

Proof of $(\forall x. \varepsilon(x)) \Rightarrow \bot $ in $\lambda\pi $ calculus $\equiv$

What is the right representation of the proof of $(\forall x. \varepsilon(x)) \Rightarrow \bot $ in simple type theory as a term of $\lambda\pi $ calculus $\equiv$? Note on notation: The epsilon ...