Questions involving philosophy of mathematics

learn more… | top users | synonyms

2
votes
2answers
231 views

Is Physics really a rigorous subject? [on hold]

Though I can't give a precise definition of the term rigor (or better to say mathematical rigor) but intuitively in case of mathematics one may note that when we say that 'the proof is rigorous' we ...
5
votes
0answers
57 views

Apparent Arbitrariness in Mathematics

Something about definitions in mathematics has always interested – confused? - me, I call it “arbitrariness in Mathematics” - it's a bad name, but I don't know a better one. Let me explain: 1st - ...
1
vote
1answer
25 views

maximum number of possible rules of a sequence?

Read this http://www.mathsisfun.com/algebra/sequences-finding-rule.html and also http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/The_Oxford_Murders_%28film%29 where the scene about the murder note left behind contains a ...
-1
votes
1answer
30 views

A Question Regarding Representing $\mathscr P$($\omega$) as a Digraph and CH

It is well known that one can represent sets as digraphs. What is the proper digraph representation of $\mathscr P$($\omega$)? I ask this because $\mathscr P$($\omega$) is $\Pi_1$ in the Levy ...
1
vote
1answer
43 views

Impredicativity and set theory

I have thought about an example in set theory, but I don't know if its legal to do it, maybe someone can help. Let $\emptyset$ be given and let $A$ be a non empty set. Let us create the subset $X = ...
14
votes
1answer
910 views

What is the “opposite” of the Axiom of Choice?

One might think that, trivially, the "opposite" of AC is $\neg$AC. However, thinking about it differently, I'm not sure this is intuitively the case. AC says that every set has a choice function. ...
3
votes
0answers
30 views

Philosophical implications of P vs NP proof?

Wikipedia article on P vs NP says that "a proof either way would have profound implications for ... Philosophy" without providing further details. So I was wondering what could be the philosophical ...
7
votes
3answers
189 views

Why is the Power Set Operation Inherently Vague?

It is a somewhat common view among mathematicians/philosophers (who have an opinion on the subject) that the power set operation is inherently vague. They go on to say that its inherent vagueness is ...
5
votes
1answer
133 views

What goes wrong in the following argument that our conception of “set” is inconsistent?

This question might sound facetious, but it is a genuine question which I am very much interested in. I apologize in advance if it is too conceptual or philosophical, but I'm optimistic that I might ...
2
votes
1answer
70 views

Can arithmetic truths fix the truth value of the Continuum Hypothesis?

Many logicians and philosophers believe that all sentences expressible in the language of Peano Arithmetic have determinate truth-values, even though no nice formal system can capture all of these ...
3
votes
1answer
77 views

Is the first-order incompleteness of a theory (like arithmetics, set theory or logic itself) avoidable in a second or higher-order axiomatizations?

Can we avoid the first-order incompleteness of a theory (like arithmetics or set theory) in a second-order theory which contains the previous? How does it depend on the chosen semantics or models? If ...
4
votes
0answers
68 views

Strange Consequences of Large Cardinals in Probability

Large cardinal axioms are very strong hypothesizes and as any other strong hypothesis they have many strange consequences in mathematics. On the other hand we know that if we bring even the least ...
0
votes
1answer
125 views

Is Bell's Notion of “Abstract Set” Flawed?

Consider the following definition of "abstract set" given by John L. Bell (who wrote the book "Set Theory: Boolean-valued Models and Independence Proofs") from his preprint "Abstract and Variable ...
2
votes
1answer
73 views

Why the dual of some results are true while others are false?

In mathematics, many results have their "dual" versions. In many cases, if a result is true, then its dual is true as well. However, there are some examples while the dual of a true statement is ...
5
votes
3answers
348 views

Good Sources for Lecture Movies in Set Theory, Logic and Philosophy of Maths

Of course as any other researcher I'm not able to attend any scientific event in my research area. But it is always interesting and useful to watch the lecture movies of these events. I will ...
0
votes
4answers
112 views

what is $e$ really? what is its meaning? [duplicate]

I don't get it how we came up with $e$ and how can nature use this number so much! that is what I have been told and I only know that $e$ is a specific constant like $\pi$! I understand that $\pi$ ...
1
vote
1answer
65 views

Can a proof be too long? [closed]

Suppose that there is an omnipotent oracle saying that there is a proof for Riemann hypothesis but its proof is so long the universum would collapse before mankind will understand the proof. Would ...
5
votes
0answers
84 views

Are there examples of mathematical problems proven by abduction?

Proof by deduction is a simple principal. For example: All humans are mortal, and Bill is a human; Therefore, Bill is mortal. However, proof by abduction is a bit different. A famous example: ...
2
votes
2answers
49 views

Undecidability and truth

Are there undecidable problems for which a single truth exists? For example, the question about parallels is not decidable from Euclid axioms. But multiple answers are valid and give different kinds ...
0
votes
1answer
169 views

Hand-incalculable Problems

Let's define a "hand-incalculable problem" as a mathematical problem that can not be solved by available human calculation power (using only writing materials and utensils) at a specific date and ...
16
votes
7answers
2k views

Why do we stop at exponentiation stage in arithmetic of natural numbers?

In natural numbers the unary successor operator $S$ is the most natural function which maps each number to the next one. Furthermore we may consider the binary relation $+$ as an iteration of $S$. ...
1
vote
2answers
76 views

How can we explain the discrepancy between $\rightarrow$ (IF-THEN) and $\setminus$ (A-BUT-NOT-B)?

Let $\mathbb{B} = \{0,1\}$ denote the Boolean domain, ordered in the usual way. Then $\mathbb{B}$ is a lattice. It has a join operation $\vee$ that coincides with "OR," a meet operation $\wedge$ that ...
0
votes
1answer
15 views

How could we define the existence of an object/element in the Euclidean space?

Let X be an object/element, What does it mean when I say "X is an object in the Euclidean space"? in other words, What differs an existed object from an unexisted one in the Euclidean space?
3
votes
2answers
68 views

Formal theories dealing with non-commutattive and non-transitive notion of equality

This question is inspired by a philosophical discussion which I don't want to bother you with. As far as I know when we use (or define) the statement "$x$ is equal to $y$" in logic and ordinary ...
0
votes
1answer
43 views

Points and real intervals [closed]

The sorites paradox goes like this: Start with a heap of sand. Remove a grain of sand and you still have a heap; remove another, and another, and another, and you'll still have a heap. Eventually, ...
9
votes
1answer
65 views

Can the set of computable numbers be used as a theoretical basis for calculus?

I recall from my Real Analysis course that the rational numbers $\mathbb{Q}$ are not suitable for doing calculus, and I believe the reason was that $\mathbb{Q}$ does not possess the least-upper-bound ...
0
votes
0answers
95 views

An adequate difference between $\forall x\in A:P(x)$ and $(\forall x)(x\in A\rightarrow P(x))$?

Ever since I was a young student I have felt doubts about the traditional $(\forall x)$-expression: starting a statement with such an irrational lack of focus doesn't seems reasonable! I mean, all $x$ ...
0
votes
2answers
91 views

Does axiom of foundation/regularity protect against Russell-like paradoxes?

In ZF set theory the axiom of regularity (also called axiom of foundation) says that: In all nonempty sets x there is an element y such that x∩y=∅ As I been told that the intention of the axiom ...
1
vote
1answer
99 views

Does Mathematics exists apart from the mathematician? [closed]

Does Mathematics exists apart from the mathematician? Explain yourself. Mathematics seems to be a projection of the mind. But from where the mind originates? Can the source of the mind be known or you ...
4
votes
2answers
177 views

Are “proofs” that are contingent upon physical reality valid?

Consider the following statement: Let $P$ be any polygon and let $A$ be a point inside of $P$. Then there exists at least one side of $P$ such that the perpendicular from $A$ to said side touches ...
1
vote
2answers
383 views

Is there such a thing as the Fundamental Theorem of ZFC?

I was initially meaning to ask to about a fundamental theorem of mathematics, but the word "mathematics" is very vague. So, my question is the title. I want to know if there is a theorem of ZFC that, ...
2
votes
1answer
88 views

Building math theory on absurd axioms - reducing math to logic

I know similar questions have been asked and i know my terminology might be wrong but I am trying to come to an answer to whether math can be derived from logic. Wikipedia defines logic as use and ...
-2
votes
2answers
190 views

Is Infinity Needed in Maths? Does Infinity Actually Exist? [closed]

I'm asking this question as I have been having an on going online debate with a friend of mine. I claimed that Infinity does in fact exist in Maths and in Reality, as there's a whole plethora of ...
3
votes
5answers
151 views

Is $'' \sum_{n = 1}^{\infty} (-1)^n \; \text{is a real number}''$ an invalid statement or a false proposition?

So we're beginning an introductory logic course and my professor is giving examples for valid statements/ propositions - meaningful statements that are either true or false but not both. So he puts ...
5
votes
2answers
58 views

How is Cartesian coordinate system related to his philosophy

In 1637, Rene Descartes published his famous monograph about philosophy "Discourse on the Method of reasoning well and Seeking Truth in the Sciences", and analytic method of geometry has been come up ...
2
votes
2answers
147 views

Three-valued logic as foundation

Isn't it more natural to use Three-valued logic(false-true-unknown) as the foundation of mathematics? It is a better model for natural languages. And it also can model sentences like the lair paradox ...
1
vote
1answer
25 views

Probability that theoretical results match experimental results

I am not sure if this can be determined, but I was wondering if there was any way to go deeper into probability to find the odds that your experimental results match your theoretical results. For ...
6
votes
4answers
164 views

The nature of infinities

I have been thinking about the nature of infinity lately. I have no experience with higher mathematics or theorems regarding infinity, so please forgive me if my ideas on this topic are extremely ...
3
votes
2answers
156 views

Gödel's incompleteness theorems

In the last paragraph of Stephan Hawking's speech "Godel and the End of the Universe", he mentioned "... I'm now glad that our search for understanding will never come to an end, and that we will ...
1
vote
0answers
47 views

Why is time important in the Ross-Littlewood paradox?

I have read many defferent versions of the Ross-Littlewood Paradox. This post: Fun quiz: where did the infinitely many candies come from? This post: Paradox: increasing sequence that goes to $0$? ...
5
votes
0answers
52 views

Codifying ways to think and write about imprecise ideas?

This question will not be about affine spaces; rather those are mentioned here as one of many examples. A vector space has an underlying set and a field of scalars and an operation of linear ...
2
votes
1answer
55 views

Geometries (Euclidean and Projective)

We can think of Euclidean Geometry and Cartesian (Coordinate) Geometry as equivalent, in the sense that some proposition is true in Euclidean Geometry iff it's true in Coordinate Geometry. It makes ...
13
votes
4answers
271 views

Which mathematical ideas most influenced the way you think?

This is not a question about how you use a formula or mathematical method to solve quantitative problems - that is applied mathematics. Rather, I'd like to hear how deeper ideas gained through the ...
1
vote
3answers
143 views

Why Maximize Expected Value?

In many instances I've come across (in Game Theory, etc), when trying to choose an optimal strategy it has the criterion that it wants to maximize expected value much of the time. To simplify this ...
2
votes
7answers
464 views

Are the real numbers really uncountable?

Consider the following statement Every real number must have a definition in order to be discussed. What this statement doesn't specify is how that loose-specific that definition is. Some examples ...
1
vote
3answers
82 views

Zermelo–Fraenkel set theory the natural numbers defines $1$ as $1 = \{\{\}\}$ but this does not seem right

If 1 can be defined as the set that contains only the empty set then what of sets which contain one thing such as the set of people who are me. number 1 does not just mean $1$ nothing, it means $1$ ...
1
vote
1answer
66 views

Formulation VS Interpretation

I'm reading a book on Mathematical Physics and at some point the author says that we must distinguish between a "formulation" and an "interpretation" of a theory, although it's not easy to point what ...
0
votes
2answers
121 views

Is the “Most Important Property a Set S has” Necessary and Sufficient to Define a Paradox-Free Notion of Set?

About a year and a half ago, while I was looking on the Web for papers regarding the Russell paradox, I chanced to find an interesting concept. This concept was contained in what (for want of a ...
0
votes
0answers
29 views

Theoretical question of physical analogies to different O(f(x)) based characteristics of algoritms

I want to better understand the following concepts: "n!", "e^n". I.e. what is the physical analogy of the functions at the bottom of the message. F.ex. for the "n^a" and "log a x" where a equals to ...
2
votes
1answer
110 views

Why didn't Frege succeed in his attempts to reduce mathematics to logic?

My background: Sophomore-level understanding of mathematics and philosophical logic. All the explanations I have found online so far are either far too technical or too simplistic. Thanks in advance ...