# Tagged Questions

The subject of operator algebras is primarily C*-algebras and von Neumann algebras, and associated topics. It also includes more general algebras of operators on Hilbert space, and may include algebras of operators on other topological vector spaces. It is related to but distinct from the subjects ...

51 views

33 views

### Proving the unitary relation of ensemble decompositions

I apologize if this is better suited for physics.stackexchange; looking at previously asked questions it seems as if this would be a good fit here, as the arguments are mostly mathematical. In my ...
49 views

### States: Approximate Unit

Given a C*-algebra $\mathcal{A}$. Consider a state: $\omega\geq0$ Especially one has: $\sup\omega(E^2)=\|\omega\|$ Can it actually fail to be a proper limit? The problem is that the square is not ...
102 views

### Positive Elements: Norm (Decomposition)

Given a C*-algebra $\mathcal{A}$. Then every element decomposes into: $Z=X_+-X_-+iY_+-iY_-=\sum_{\alpha=0\ldots3}i^\alpha Z_\alpha$ Obviously, one has: $\|Z\|\leq\sum_{\alpha=0\ldots3}\|Z_\alpha\|$ ...
59 views

### States: Positivity vs. Continuity

Definition Define positivity in terms of: $$\omega\geq0:\iff\omega(X^*X)\geq0$$ (This way it serves best for the GNS-construction.) Problem Given a C*-algebra $1\notin\mathcal{A}$. Consider a ...
49 views

### States: Extension

Definition Define positivity in terms of: $$\omega\geq0:\iff\omega(X^*X)\geq0$$ (This way it serves best for the GNS-construction.) Problem Given a C*-algebra $1\notin\mathcal{A}$ and adjoin a unit ...
66 views

### An elementary perturbation result in C*-algebra

The following question was raised when I read a papaer "MF actions and K-theoretic dynamics". In one of the proofs in that paper, the author utilized a so called "elementary perturbation result in C*-...
636 views

### On the exponential form of a unitary matrix

A unitary matrix $U \in \large C_{n,n}$ can always be written in the exponential form: $U = e ^{iA}$ (1) where $A$ is Hermitian. My goal is to find the Hermitian matrix $A$, given the unitary ...
49 views

13 views

### Dynamics: EQ-States vs. NESS-States

Given a C*-algebra $\mathcal{A}$ with dynamics $\tau$. Consider a state that relaxes towards equilibrium: $$\omega_T(A):=\omega\circ\tau^T(A)\stackrel{T\to\infty}{\to}\omega_\infty(A)$$ Then it ...
71 views

### Set-theoretic questions about the definitions of crossed-product $C^{*}$-algebras and group $C^{*}$-algebras.

In his book Crossed Products of $C^{*}$-Algebras, Dana P. Williams defines the crossed product of a $C^{*}$-algebra $A$ by a locally compact group $G$ as the completion of ${C_{c}}(G,A)$ ...
61 views

51 views

### trace identities for the functional calculus

I'm sorry if this is a trivial question, but I cannot convince myself of why $\text{Tr}\,f(EFE)=\text{Tr}\,f(FEF)$ for projections $E$ and $F$ on a Hilbert space and a (say, continuous or Borel) ...
50 views

Let $\mathcal{R}$ denote the hyperfinite type $II_{1}$ factor, with $\mathcal{R}^{\omega}$ the ultrapower of $\mathcal{R}$, in respect to some ultrafilter $\omega$ on $\mathbb{N}$. I'm reading a paper ...
57 views

### A question about the definition of group $C^\ast$-algebra

Let $G$ be a local compact group, then group $C^\ast$-algebra of $G$ is defined as the completion of $C_c(G)$ with respect to some norm. By now, I have seen three norms. $\|f\|=\sup\|\pi(f)\|$, ...
35 views

86 views

### Maximal abelian subalgebras of SAW*-algebras

Pedersen distilled the following class of C*-algebras which he termed SAW*-algebras: A C*-algebra $A$ is an SAW*-algebra if for each pair of orthogonal, positive elements $x,y\in A$, there exists a ...
62 views

### The cone over separable C*-algebra is also separable?

For a C*-algebra $A$, the cone over $A$ is $CA=C_{0}(0,1]\otimes A$ , My question: If $A$ is separable, $CA$ is also separable?
63 views

43 views

105 views

23 views

### Spectrum of $C^\ast$ subalgebra

Let $A$ be a unital $C^\ast$ algebra. It is stated in this book that for any $C^\ast$ subalgebra we have $\sigma_B(b)\cup\{0\} = \sigma_A(b)\cup\{0\}$. The reasoning why this should be true is this: ...
### $\sigma$-weak topology versus weak operator topology
The reference text for this question is: Pedersen, Analysis Now, GTM 118. The $\sigma$-weak topology on $B(H)$ (the bounded linear operators on a Hilbert space $H$) is the weak$^*$-topology on $B(H)$...