2
votes
0answers
27 views

Question on morphism locally of finite type

The exercise 3.1 in GTM 52 by Hartshorne require to prove that $f:X \longrightarrow Y$ is locally of finite type iff for every open affine subset $V=\text{Spec}B$, $f^{-1}(V)$ can be covered by open ...
2
votes
1answer
71 views

Finite fiber- unramified morphisms

I'm in trouble understandig the proof of Proposition 3.2 Chapter 1 of Milne's Book "Étale Cohomology". Let $f:Y\rightarrow X$ be locally of finite-type. The following are equivalent. $(a)$ f is ...
6
votes
1answer
95 views

How to use flatness here?

Let $X\to S$ be a scheme. Definition: A relative effective Cartier divisor on $X/S$ is a closed subscheme $D\subset X$ such that the ideal sheaf $I$ of $D$ is invertible and $D\to S$ is flat. Let ...
5
votes
1answer
58 views

Relative effective Cartier divisors

I have two different definitions of a relative effective Cartier divisor. The first one is a bit outdated and defines the notion over analytic spaces, in the following way: Definition 1: Let $X$ be ...
4
votes
2answers
86 views

Problem 3.1.2 in Liu — Omission in problem statement?

Exercise 3.1.2 in Liu's Algebraic Geometry and Arithmetic Curves is as follows. Let $f:X\rightarrow Y$ be a morphism of schemes. For any scheme $T$, let $f(T):X(T)\rightarrow Y(T)$ denote the ...
4
votes
1answer
83 views

Finite fiber of scheme morphism is zero-dimensional?

Let $X$ and $Y$ be locally Noetherian schemes and $f:X\rightarrow Y$ be an étale morphism of finite type. Let $x\in X$ and $y=f(x)$. I would like to know why the fiber $X_y$ is a zero-dimensional ...
3
votes
1answer
91 views

Does this morphism necessarily give rise to a finite extension of residue fields?

Let $f:X\rightarrow Y$ be a morphism of finite type of locally Notherian schemes. Let $x\in X$ and $y=f(x)$. Recall that $f$ is said to be unramified if the map of stalks $g:\mathcal O_{Y,y} ...
7
votes
2answers
200 views

Inverse of open affine subscheme is affine

This seems ridiculously simple, but it's eluding me. Suppose $f:X\rightarrow Y$ is a morphism of affine schemes. Let $V$ be an open affine subscheme of $Y$. Why is $f^{-1}(V)$ affine? I noted that ...
4
votes
2answers
80 views

Why is this composition of scheme morphisms proper?

I am learning about proper morphisms from Liu's book. I have a question about the proof of the Lemma 3.17 on page 104. Let $A$ and $B$ be rings and suppose $\operatorname{Spec} B$ is proper over ...
20
votes
3answers
882 views

Intuition for étale morphisms

Currently working on algebraic surfaces over the complex numbers. I did a course on schemes but at the moment just work in the language of varieties. Now i encounter the term "étale morphism" every ...
1
vote
1answer
62 views

Do nonsingular points get mapped to nonsingular points in a branched cover

Let $\pi:C\to D$ be a finite surjective morphism of noetherian integral schemes. Let $x\in C$ be a nonsingular point. Does it follow that $\pi(x)$ is nonsingular? What if we impose some conditions ...
2
votes
0answers
42 views

Can we embed K(X_eta) canonically in K(X)

Let $f:X\longrightarrow S$ be a morphism of schemes. Assume $X$ and $S$ are integral. Let $\eta$ be the generic point of $S$ and let $X_\eta\longrightarrow \textrm{Spec} \ K(S)$ be the induced ...