2
votes
1answer
90 views

Has the Gödel sentence been explicitly produced?

I do not pretend to know much about mathematical logic. But my curiosity was piqued when I read Hofstadter's Gödel, Escher, Bach, which tries to explain the proof of Gödel's first incompleteness ...
4
votes
4answers
352 views

The standard role of intuitive numbers in the foundations of mathematics

In my career I've been formed mostly in the formal side of mathematics, that is, standard set theory and every classical branch of mathematics that uses set theory. However, I am not quite sure about ...
3
votes
2answers
89 views

Can a non-classical logic be used as a meta-logic to develop classical logic?

I have read much about non-classical logics such that paraconsistent logics , relevance logics , substructural logics , non-monotonic logic and so on. I think that the meta-logic logicians use to ...
3
votes
2answers
122 views

General view of Theorems

I'm trying to see almost all theorems ( at least the non-existential ones ) as affirming that some formula ( mostly of first-order logic language ) is a logical consequence of other formulas. So, ...
2
votes
1answer
41 views

Are all theorems of minimal arithmetic theorems of a given theory?

I am working on some metamathematics revision and the following question came up. Let the theory $R_0$ be axiomatized by the following axiom schemata which hold for all $n,m \in \mathbb{N}$: ...
1
vote
2answers
78 views

Use of propositional logic connectives in the meta-language

I have a doubt that might seem a bit confusing so i will try to explain it the clearer i can. Suppose we have an expression "A o B" in the meta-language, where 'o' refers to those logical ...
2
votes
3answers
63 views

Satisfiability Proof Question

Exercise: Prove that $\Gamma\models A$ iff $\Gamma\cup\{\neg A\}$ is not satisfiable. Proof: We must prove two clauses: $\Gamma\models A\Rightarrow \Gamma\cup\{\neg A\}$ is not satisfiable ...
-4
votes
1answer
91 views

Is there an “end”? [closed]

This question may seem silly, but I nevertheless think that it is worth wondering over: is mathematics itself finite? As I understand, mathematics is a study of form and existence under constraints, ...
5
votes
1answer
103 views

Do metatheoretic results carry between mutually interpretable theories?

If two theories A and B are mutually interpretable, in the sense of there existing a translation procedure from A to B and from B to A, does it follow that whatever metatheoretic results (e.g., ...
0
votes
2answers
134 views

Is there a useful application of Peano arithmetic?

If there is, can someone provide an example of how Peano arithmetic can be used to solve a real-world problem? If not, can someone provide an example of any axiomatic system other than ZFC that can ...
10
votes
4answers
447 views

Clarification of a remark of J. Steel on the independence of Goldbach from ZFC

On page 424 of the following paper: S. Feferman, Harvey M. Friedman, P. Maddy and John R. Steel, ``Does Mathematics Need New Axioms?'' The Bulletin of Symbolic Logic, Vol. 6, No. 4 (Dec., 2000), pp. ...
2
votes
1answer
123 views

question about Godel numbering

I have a question about Godel numbering, it is trivial but I would like to know how can you know the length of an expression through its Godel number. ¿? I think you can use a recursive function but ...
1
vote
1answer
79 views

A Simpler Characterization of Inductive Definitions?

While reading appendix A of John Harrison's "Handbook of Practical Logic and Automated Reasoning" a somewhat advanced theorem is appealed to as a prerequisite for characterizing when an inductive ...
2
votes
2answers
785 views

Is Gödel's theorem invalid? [closed]

Right now I've skim through Gödel's theorem is invalid by Diego Saá on arXiv (freely available). As it seems very plausible, I ask for any references and scrutinizations of the paper.
10
votes
2answers
285 views

Are there formal systems that can not be proved to be complete or incomplete?

I'm reading GEB and was thinking about this. Are there any formal systems where the proof of their completeness/incompleteness is unprovable? This question could go ad infinitum. Could there be any ...
6
votes
3answers
148 views

If $T$ proves $\operatorname{Con}(ZFC)$, is $T$ at least as strong as set theory?

I am looking for either a proof of counterexample of this: Lemma: Let $\pi$ be a faithful interpretation of $PA$ into $ZFC$, and let $PA'$ be the image of $PA$ under $\pi$. If there is a $T$ with ...
4
votes
0answers
82 views

An “internal” condition on $T$ so that for the standard provability predicate, $T$ proves $\text{Pf}(\underline S)$ implies $T$ proves $S$?

This is probably quite basic, but I'd like to make sure I got this right. Regarding the proof of Goedel's first incompleteness theorem, say that we have $T$ containing $PA$ effectively axiomatizable ...
2
votes
2answers
150 views

A theorem about inductive inference

In the book 'Introduction of the theory of Statistics' by Mood,Graybill,Boes (third edition)on page 220 (Chapter 6 on Sampling) you can read: 'Inductive inference is well known to be a hazardous ...
8
votes
2answers
877 views

Definition of “non-constructive proof”

I was wondering if it is possible to define exactly what a non-constructive (nc) proof is. I have often seen the concept associated with the use of principles such as the axiom of choice or the law of ...
2
votes
1answer
221 views

Truth and undecidability

I believe this is more of a philosophical question. Given a consistent theory T and a statement S independent of T. Can S be true or false in T? (I don't see any contradiction with that) I read that ...
11
votes
1answer
344 views

Formalizing metamathematics

I am reading historical/philosophical stuff on the concept of "metamathematics" and am by now quite confused. Several questions emerged, but they are probably somehow confused and interrelated, I ...
2
votes
0answers
228 views

Statements about logic (=“metalogic”(??)) [closed]

Sometimes there are statements about logic e.g. "That's not logical" and I can neither prove nor disprove a statement about logic with no definition for logic itself. It's just a negation and it's ...
13
votes
6answers
3k views

Why bother with Mathematics, if Gödel's Incompleteness Theorem is true?

OK, maybe the title is exaggerated, but is it true that the rest of math is just "good enough", or a good approximation of absolute truth - like Newtonian physics compared to general relativity? How ...
7
votes
1answer
136 views

Are there any strongly axiomatizable logics that are not compact?

I mean here a logic in the sense of a language and semantics. By strongly axiomatizable I mean strongly sound and strongly complete. So I'm basically asking if there is a particular deductive system ...