-1
votes
0answers
16 views

How Do I Show that Condensed Derivable Rules of Inference Yield the Same Formula as Using Condendensed Detachment Multiple Times?

If we look at condensed detachment of two formulas $\alpha$ and $\beta$, we can see that D$\alpha$.$\beta$, where $\alpha$ has form C$\alpha$$_a$$\alpha$$_b$ is equivalent to using the rule ...
6
votes
1answer
89 views

Why wouldn't someone accept Gentzen's consistency proof?

Reading the consistency section of the Peano Axioms wikipedia page, I came across this sentence: The vast majority of contemporary mathematicians believe that Peano's axioms are consistent, ...
3
votes
0answers
144 views
+50

Does a finitely axiomatizable theory with $\Sigma_n$ axioms have $\Sigma_n$ theorems?

Let $T$ be a theory with a finite set of axioms $\Delta$, where every sentence of $\Delta$ is $\Sigma_n$ (in the Levy hierarchy). Is every theorem of $T$ (i.e. every sentence that is proved by $T$) ...
1
vote
1answer
55 views

Question about the incompleteness proof (Theorem V)

Question in short: Where do I find a complete proof of Theorem V from Gödels incompleteness proof? If it does not exists, can someone provide it? Question in detail: I am trying to understand ...
1
vote
2answers
43 views

Using logical Properties to prove a tautology

So I have to prove this as a tautology. I've been stuck on this forever and am not sure where to go. I experimented and got this far, and looking for some pointers on where to take it next. (p → q) ...
3
votes
1answer
70 views

Birkhoff's completeness theorem

I have two simple questions. A) Does Birkhoff's completeness theorem follow directly from Gödel's completeness theorem? B) Is Birkhoff's completeness theorem constructive in the following sense: ...
2
votes
2answers
114 views

Is constructive proof of non-existence possible

Constructive proof construct(indicates) object that satisfies given predicate. Question is whether one can give constructive proof of non-existence of an object with given property e.g. that every ...
1
vote
1answer
33 views

Weakening and Contraction

I saw this site saying weakening is a structural rule where the hypotheses or conclusion of a sequent may be extended with additional members and that contraction is a rule where two equal (or ...
0
votes
1answer
54 views

What is really a “complete” deductive system for first-order theories.

Given some first-order language and a set of axioms therefrom one still needs to specify a deductive system to turn it into a full-fledged first-order theory. Currently I'm under the following ...
1
vote
0answers
57 views

Is a sentence in $\Pi_1$ true given $Q \vdash \lnot\varphi$?

If $Q \vdash \lnot\varphi$ (Q is the Robinson arithmetic), and if I assume that $\varphi \in \Pi_1$; Can I say that $\varphi$ is a true sentence? My thoughts are that, given that Q is $\Sigma_1$- ...
1
vote
1answer
68 views

A simple question on Gödel's functional interpretation

I've been recently reading the Gödel's functional interpretation (or Dialectica). It is generally defined inductively, as could be found here: http://www.andrew.cmu.edu/user/avigad/Papers/dialect.pdf ...
4
votes
2answers
165 views

Is there a minimal axiomatization of ZFC?

Working in ZFC, does there exist a set $\Sigma$ of sentences which axiomatizes ZFC (i.e. every sentence in $\Sigma$ is provable from your favorite axiomatization of ZFC, and vice versa) and is minimal ...
6
votes
1answer
94 views

Is there a way to tell how many different ways you can prove a theorem?

Consider the question. Given the nature of a sentence $S$, it there any way to tell how many different ways you can prove this sentence? Proofs are not distinct if we have a situation such as: $P ...
1
vote
2answers
94 views

Is it possible to prove that the encoding of existentials in System F is valid?

In Girard's Proofs and Types, under item 11.3.5, second-order existential quantification is encoded in System F using universal quantification as follows: $$ \Sigma X.V \equiv \Pi Y. (\Pi X.(V \to ...
2
votes
1answer
57 views

Use a proposition to prove another proposition

I'd like to ask for help with an exercise from Solow - How to Read and Do Proofs(3.16). I've tried to get through it but I can't make the proper connection between the two properties. I figured that ...
4
votes
3answers
116 views

Deriving $A \rightarrow ( B \rightarrow C ) \rightarrow ( ( A \rightarrow B ) \rightarrow ( A \rightarrow C ) )$ in the sequent calculus

I need to prove the following theorem: $A\to (B\to C) \to ((A\to B) \to (A\to C))$ using the sequent calculus method. Using the rules: $$ G, A \Rightarrow B,D \over G \Rightarrow A \to B , D ...
1
vote
2answers
189 views

Mathematical statements that cannot be proved or disproved [closed]

I've recently been reading about the continuum hypothesis and am fascinated by the fact that it cannot be proved or disproved, despite the fact that the statement itself is either true or false. What ...
2
votes
0answers
63 views

Can we always give a direct proof? [duplicate]

This is something I was wondering about for quite a while. Is it possible to construct a statement that can only be proven by using 'proof by contradicition' or contraposition? Or to put it ...
9
votes
1answer
189 views

Gödel's way of teaching non-standard models to Takeuti.

In Memoirs of a Proof Theorist, Gaisi Takeuti relates how Gödel taught him about nonstandard models in an "interesting" way: It went as follows. Let T be a theory with a nonstandard model. By ...
0
votes
1answer
56 views

particular property and completeness?

I was puzzeling with the almost standard definition of completeness: In mathematical logic and metalogic, a formal system is called complete with respect to a particular property if every formula ...
1
vote
3answers
93 views

Defining a partial function in a formal theory

Assume we have a first-order theory $T$ of arithmetic (i.e., number theory). Suppose I wish to introduce a new function symbol $f$ in the theory, so that $f$ is a partial number function (namely, it ...
1
vote
3answers
78 views

$\neg(A\Rightarrow B) \iff A\land \neg B$

When considering the question: Rewrite the following using only the symbols $A, B, \lor, \land, \neg$ : $$\neg(A\Rightarrow B)$$ I do not understand how to interpret this and what method to ...
3
votes
1answer
40 views

$HA^{\omega}$ is a conservative extension of $HA$. But why?

This is definitely a silly question, but I've no one to ask... $HA^{\omega}$ is an extension of $HA$ in all finite types. One can formalize a model of $HA^{\omega}$ in $HA$ using indicies of partial ...
3
votes
5answers
99 views

Difference between bound and free variable

What is the difference between $\forall x (P(x)\implies Q(x))$ and $P(x)\implies Q(x)$ I know in the first one the variable x is bound but in the second one the variable is free. What are the ...
0
votes
1answer
234 views

Formal proofs and Deduction Theorem

In this question i will explain one idea i had about basic formal proofs and the use of Deduction Theorem. I'm considering a formula γ to be a logical consequence of a set A of formulas if and only ...
3
votes
2answers
108 views

Law of excluded middle. Do we need it in proofs?

Quite often when I am making a natural deduction proof, and I have no fixed idea on how to continue. I find myself thinking: "lets start with some form of the law of the excluded middle (LEM) and ...
4
votes
2answers
83 views

Graph that represents logical reasoning

The proof of a statement $X$ in terms of assumptions $A$, $B$ and $C$ can sometimes be represented using a directed graph: $$ \begin{matrix} & & X\\ & \nearrow & & ...
10
votes
1answer
154 views

Can all math results be formalized and checked by a computer?

Can all math results, that have been correctly proven so far, be formalized and checked by a computer? If so, what type of logic would need to be used there? I've heard that the first-order logic is ...
3
votes
2answers
122 views

General view of Theorems

I'm trying to see almost all theorems ( at least the non-existential ones ) as affirming that some formula ( mostly of first-order logic language ) is a logical consequence of other formulas. So, ...
0
votes
1answer
83 views

Hilbert calculus: Proof that every provable formula has a proof

For my indroduction to logic course I have to proof, that every provable formula has a proof. It sounds first very funny, second also very logic, still I don't get to make of formally work.. The ...
0
votes
1answer
32 views

Proving that operations give equal results given equal inputs

I was reading about the 9 or 12 basic properties of 'fields' (if that's what they're called) in a book called Spivak's Calculus, 3rd Edition, and got quite befuddled by dealing with as basic stuff as ...
2
votes
1answer
42 views

$LK-\Phi$ proof of $\exists y Pby$

I am having difficulty with the concept of $LK-\Phi$ proofs, here is a question I have been working on: Let $\Phi = \{Pafa\}$, where $P$ is a binary predicate symbol and $f$ is a unary function ...
1
vote
3answers
149 views

ZFC Axioms to be extended?

Sorry if this is going to be a really loaded question. I was told several times that for virtually all theorems/corollaries/propositions of mathematics (except those cases not compatible with ZFC ...
2
votes
1answer
135 views

Provable formulas in everyday Mathematics

Basically all statements ( lemmas, theoremas, corollaries ) in Mathematics can be expressed as a conditional statement in first-order language, or existential statement ( existence proofs ). Here ...
3
votes
2answers
142 views

Model-theory and Proof-theory in Propositional Logic

I'm trying to link results of model theory and proof-theory in propositional language. Here i will use $\models$ to denote logical consequence, in the model-theory sense. Being $x,y$ two formulas of ...
1
vote
1answer
36 views

The approximation rule implies the equality rule in systems of type assignments

I'm reading Barendregt's Lambda calculi with types (1992). In Proposition 4.1.4.1., he "proves" a lemma which shows the approximation rule implies the equality rule in typed lambda-calculi à la ...
47
votes
8answers
5k views

Is it possible that “A counter-example exists but it cannot be found”

Then otherwise the sentence "It is not possible for someone to find a counter-example" would be a proof. I mean, are there some hypotheses that are false but the counter-example is somewhere we ...
1
vote
2answers
90 views

Does generalization of axioms apply also to theorems?

In Enderton's book "A Mathematical Introduction to Logic" (second edition), he includes six axiom groups, and allows also for a generalization of those axioms such that if $\Psi$ is an axiom then ...
3
votes
1answer
68 views

Intuitionistic Linear Logic

I am currently going through some papers that use the "intuitionistic version" of Girard's Linear Logic. Problem is, i seem to find very little literature on it. There is a lot done on Linear Logic ...
3
votes
2answers
83 views

Double Negation is sequent calculus systems LK and LJ

In sequent calculus LK (see Gaisi Takeuti, Proof Theory (2nd ed - 1987)) we have a "standard" derivation of Double Negation in the form $\rightarrow \lnot \lnot A \supset A$. We have to start from an ...
2
votes
1answer
69 views

Proof negation in Gentzen system

I am provided with the L¬ and R¬ Gentzen rules for negation (besides “Cut” rule and some rules for ⋀ and →): $${\Gamma\vdash\Delta,\varphi\over \Gamma,\lnot\varphi\vdash \Delta}\ L\lnot \\[4ex] ...
1
vote
1answer
67 views

If $\phi$ is $\Delta^{0}_{1}$ in the language of arithmetic, does Heyting Arithmetic prove $\forall x [\phi (x) \vee \neg \phi (x)]$?

PA is conservative over HA for $\Pi^{0}_{2}$ sentences. If $\phi$ is $\Delta^{0}_{1}$, then $\forall x [\phi (x) \vee \neg \phi (x)]$ is equivalent to a $\Pi^{0}_{2}$ sentence. Since PA trivially ...
2
votes
1answer
64 views

Does second-order arithmetic (Z2) prove soundness and uniform reflection for first-order arithmetic (PA)?

(1) Does full second-order arithmetic (Z2) prove soundness and uniform reflection schemas for first-order arithmetic (PA)? That is, do we have for all formulas $\phi$: $$ \underset \phi \forall \; ...
4
votes
1answer
150 views

What are those “things that cannot be proved using only ordinary rules of inference”?

The online edition of the book Introduction to Logic by Michael Genesereth and Eric Kao, has a detail that left me confused. CHAPTER 4 [...] 4.2 Linear Proofs [...] The ...
6
votes
3answers
261 views

Give a proof that “p & ~p” implies “q”?

Context: This is not a textbook or homework problem. I was hoping you younger folks could help my tired old brain. "Everybody knows" a contradiction implies anything. What I'm looking for is a ...
0
votes
1answer
54 views

Help with positive- and negative-forms in Proof Theory

I need help in understanding a device used bu Kurt Schütte, Proof Theory (1977). In treating classical sentential calculus, he use - in place of truth-tables - the device of positive- and ...
2
votes
2answers
112 views

Proof for $\{p,p\rightarrow (q\rightarrow r)\}\vdash (p\rightarrow q)\rightarrow r$ in HR

I can't find a for $\{p,p\rightarrow (q\rightarrow r)\}\vdash (p\rightarrow q)\rightarrow r$ in HR HR is the following system: axioms: $A\rightarrow A$ $(A\rightarrow B)\rightarrow ((B\rightarrow ...
5
votes
2answers
352 views

Who stole the axioms in Natural Deduction?

The study of Gentzen's sequent calculus give me the opportunity to propose some reflections about the concept of logical truth. I'll refer to the english edition of Gentzen's works : The collected ...
12
votes
3answers
385 views

On Pudlak's “Life in an Inconsistent World”

In his Logical Foundation of Mathematics and Computational Complexity (2013), Pavel Pudlak invites the readers to ponder about fictitious people whose natural numbers are nonstandard. His exposition ...
1
vote
1answer
52 views

Enumeration of proofs

Is it possible to enumerate short proofs of short statements, so as to make sure that, say, Goldbach's conjecture doesn't have one of those? How hard would it be? Is it being done? It's seems likely ...