Large cardinals are such cardinals whose existence cannot be proved within ZFC, and requires stronger axioms to be added to ZFC, they are often used to measure the consistency strength of a certain statement in the language of set theory.

learn more… | top users | synonyms

1
vote
1answer
36 views

Model for replacement

If $R_{k} $ is a model for replacement, is necesarly k a strong limit cardinal? And if k is a regular cardinal, are then equivalent the sentences: k is a strongly inaccesible cardinal if and only if ...
8
votes
0answers
131 views

What's the latest on Laver tables?

A couple of years ago, I was astonished and delighted to learn about Laver tables, a sequence (indexed on $n$) of Cayley-like tables for a binary operation $\star$ on numbers $i,j\leq 2^n$ that ...
6
votes
0answers
161 views

Large Cardinal Inequalities

Solovay showed that the existence of $0^\dagger$ follows from the existence of two measurable cardinals. We know existence of a measurable cardinals is weaker than existence of $0^\dagger$ so we ...
5
votes
0answers
323 views

Good Reference for Large Cardinals/Homotopy Theory

I'm planning on attending a conference in Barcelona in September called "Large Cardinal Methods in Homotopy Theory" and want to try to be as prepared as I possibly can. Are there good references for ...
4
votes
0answers
48 views

Let $\Phi$ denote the statement that $\mathrm{GCH}$ holds, and that no inaccessible cardinals exist. Is $\Phi$ limiting?

By an "inner model," let us mean a transitive subclass of the universe satisfying $\mathrm{ZFC}.$ Given that, here's an (intentionally) vague definition. Definition. Call a set of axioms $\Phi$ in ...
4
votes
0answers
77 views

What are the “ordinary” (e.g. arithmetic) consequences of the universe axiom?

Consider the first-order theory obtained by adjoining to ZFC (or, better, Mac Lane set theory) the Grothendieck–Verdier (or Bourbaki?) universe axiom: For each set $x$ there exists a Grothendieck ...
3
votes
0answers
57 views

How to think about iterated ultrapowers?

I would like to gain some basic intuition about iterated ultrapowers. I am perfectly happy with accepting the construction and can see that it fits into a fundamental role in many places (for example, ...
3
votes
0answers
120 views

Levy collapse gone bad

Let $\kappa$ be strongly inaccessible, and let $\mu<\kappa$ be regular. What is the effect on $\kappa$ of forcing with the following? (1) The product of $Col(\mu,\alpha)$ for $\alpha<\kappa$, ...
3
votes
0answers
82 views

Weakly Normal Ultrafilters

A filter $F$ on $\lambda$ is weakly normal if and only if for all $f : \lambda \rightarrow \lambda$ such that $\{\xi < \lambda : f(\xi) < \xi\} \in F^+$, then there is some $\beta < \lambda$ ...
3
votes
0answers
122 views

Formalizing model-theoretical large cardinals in a formal system for ZFC

I work with the Metamath formal system, which is expressive enough to define ZFC and prove some nontrivial stuff, but my current goal is to define large cardinals, and I'm hitting a wall somewhere ...
3
votes
0answers
102 views

Can any large cardinal axiom be reached by a recursive sequence of unbounded sequences and fixed points?

The lowest large cardinals can be seen as a simple recursive rule that defines an unbounded sequence, then defines a fixed point of the sequence, then an unbounded sequence of fixed points, a fixed ...
3
votes
0answers
76 views

Are large cardinals bi-interperable with type theory?

"Sets in Types, Types in Sets" establishes that the calculus of constructions is bi-interpretable with ZFC + infinitely many inaccessibles. Are there any more results like this higher up the large ...
2
votes
0answers
54 views

Proof of PFA from Supercompact

In Jech's proof (in chapter 31) that the consistency of a supercompact cardinal implies the consistency of PFA, he needs the following fact: Let $\mathbb{P}_\kappa$ be the countable support forcing ...
2
votes
0answers
96 views

How large or small can the gap in Shelah's main gap theorem be, up to consistency?

Shelah's main gap theorem in model theory says: For each first order complete theory $T$ in a countable language if $I(T,\kappa)$ denotes the number of its models of size $\kappa$ then one of ...
2
votes
0answers
86 views

Why are large cardinal axioms actually axioms?

A cardinal is an isomorphism class in ZFC, or a representative of one. I'm not asking what the significant uses of large cardinals are, or why we would want to find them or construct them; I'm ...
2
votes
0answers
82 views

Follow up question for an exam question

Some time ago I got an answer to this old exam question. Now I found the following question, which strikes me as very similar: Let $\kappa$ measurable cardinal, and $\preceq$ a partial ordering on ...
1
vote
0answers
33 views

Dual Constructions for Core Models

Roughly speaking, core models are inner models of ZFC which could contain some large cardinals. e.g. $L$ is the smallest core model and it is possible to have inaccessible, Mahlo, weakly compact, ...
1
vote
0answers
40 views

Large Cardinals with Elementary Extension Characterization

Question: Which large cardinals like $\kappa$ have a characterization in the following form: $\kappa$ is large if and only if for all cardinals $\lambda>\kappa$, $\langle ...
1
vote
0answers
114 views

Zero sharp and Kunen inconsistence.

There is some (deep/shallow/interesting/trivial) relation between: (1) $\exists 0^\sharp$ iff $\exists j:L\longrightarrow L$ nontrivial elementary embedding. (2) The Kunen inconsistency $\not\exists ...
1
vote
0answers
83 views

Tarski's axiom implies a proper class of inaccessible cardinals

I'm trying to prove this theorem, but is it even true? A Tarski's class is a set $T$ such that: For each $y\in T$, ${\cal P}(y)\subseteq T$ and ${\cal P}(y)\in T$, and for each $A\subseteq T$ such ...
1
vote
0answers
75 views

Ultrapowers by extenders of potential premice

I have a problem with an argument in Fine structure and iteration trees by Mitchell and Steel. Let $E$ be a $(\kappa, \lambda)$-extender. Let $\dot E^{\mathcal{M}}$ the a unary predicate with is ...