Large cardinals are such cardinals whose existence cannot be proved within ZFC, and requires stronger axioms to be added to ZFC, they are often used to measure the consistency strength of a certain statement in the language of set theory.

learn more… | top users | synonyms

2
votes
1answer
99 views

Are there axioms for $\mathrm{ZFC}$ that imply that $\aleph_1$ is very large?

A bit of philosophy: under the usual definition of the aleph numbers, ZFC proves the sentence "$\aleph_1$ is an ordinal." However, in some sense $\aleph_1$ isn't really an ordinal (in my opinion), ...
2
votes
0answers
36 views

Do large cardinal properties tend to be semiabsolute?

I don't know much about large cardinals; so, I want to get a feeling of the landscape. Hence this question. Definition. Whenever $C$ is a unary predicate in the language of ZFC, let us call $C$ ...
2
votes
0answers
62 views

Inaccessible Cardinals and Grothendieck Universes

I'm trying to prove that the following statements are equivalent: 1.$\forall\alpha\in\mathbb{ON}\ \exists\ \kappa>\alpha$ is an inaccessible cardinal. 2.$\forall x\ \exists\ U\ x\in U$ and $U$ is ...
0
votes
0answers
36 views

Applications of Infinitary Matrices in Set Theory

Matrices have a natural generalization to infinitary context. There are few known applications of such matrices in set theory. For example one may use Ulam matrices to show that real-valued measurable ...
2
votes
0answers
36 views

Is the following notion equivalent to subtle cardinals?

Let $\kappa$ be a regular, uncountable cardinal. We call $\kappa$ $\dagger$ if for every sequence $(A_\alpha \colon \alpha < \kappa)$, $A_\alpha \subseteq \alpha$ and every $\xi_0 < \kappa$ ...
2
votes
0answers
47 views

Is there any inconsistent large cardinal axiom which its inconsistency proof is essentially different from proof of Kunen inconsisteny theorem?

There is a long list of large cardinal axioms. Most of them deemed to be consistent with ZFC but there are also some axioms like existence of Reinhardt or $\omega$-huge cardinals which are natural ...
2
votes
0answers
90 views

How large is an uncountable regular cardinal which is closed under arbitrary fast operators?

Let $Card$ be the proper class of all cardinals, define an infinite set of operators like $\otimes_{n}:(Card\setminus \omega)\times (Card\setminus\{0\})\longrightarrow Card$ which are defined for each ...
3
votes
1answer
70 views

$\kappa$ ineffable $\Rightarrow$ $\kappa$ tree-property

Let $\kappa$ be an uncountable, regular cardinal. We call $\kappa$ ineffable iff for every sequence $(A_\xi \colon \xi < \kappa)$ of subsets $A_\xi \subseteq \xi$ there is a stationary subset $S ...
3
votes
0answers
46 views

Is there any filter space characterization for strong cardinals?

The theory of filter spaces is introduced by Apter, Diprisco, Henle & Zwicker, in their joint paper: Arthur Apter, Carlos Di Prisco, James Henle, and William Zwicker, Filter spaces: towards a ...
7
votes
1answer
106 views

Consistency strength of the “club ultrafilter”

What are the consistency strengths of $$ZF+``\text{The club filter on $\omega_1$ is an ultrafilter}"$$ and $$ZF + DC + ``\text{The club filter on $\omega_1$ is an ultrafilter}"?$$ I know that the ...
4
votes
0answers
69 views

Strange Consequences of Large Cardinals in Probability

Large cardinal axioms are very strong hypothesizes and as any other strong hypothesis they have many strange consequences in mathematics. On the other hand we know that if we bring even the least ...
2
votes
0answers
34 views

Is it true that each large cardinal which is not first order expressible has no extender characterization?

It is well-known that Reinhardt cardinal (i.e. The critical point of a non-trivial self-elementary embedding of the universe in $ZF$) is not first order expressible. Does this imply that Reinhardt ...
-1
votes
1answer
71 views

ineffable, weakly compact, and ? cardinal

In the online book, page 312, http://projecteuclid.org/download/pdf_1/euclid.pl/1235419485 what cardinal notion do we get, by requireing that X in the bottom of the page, is not only stationary ...
2
votes
0answers
65 views

Kanamori's proof that Vopenka's principle implies the existence of extendibles.

In The Higher Infinite, Kanamori gives a proof that Vopenka's principle implies the existence of (many) extendibles. The relevant theorem is Proposition 24.15 on p.337. Working in a $V_\kappa$ which ...
4
votes
1answer
132 views

Consistency strength of 0-1 valued Borel measures

The following is an overly fancy way of asking a question suggested in Borel Measures: Atoms vs. Point Masses Let $\phi$ be a property that topological spaces can have (such as "compact", "$T_1$", ...
0
votes
0answers
71 views

Is the notion of “small cardinal” well definable?

When we talk about large cardinals, at least for many of them, we usually isolate a particular property expressing their "relative largeness with respect to cardinals below them". For example being ...
1
vote
0answers
55 views

How to make a large cardinal unique?

A general form of questions regarding large cardinals is the following: Let $A(x)$ be the formula asserting "$x$ is a large cardinal of type $A$" then is the following true? ...
2
votes
0answers
50 views

Large Cardinal Consequences of $\kappa$-Suslin Hypothesis

$\kappa$-Suslin Hypothesis ($\kappa$-SH) for the infinite regular cardinal $\kappa$ says that every tree of height $\kappa$ either has a branch of length $\kappa$ or an antichain of cardinality ...
3
votes
2answers
66 views

$0^\sharp$ and the regularity of $\aleph_\omega$

I'm sure I'm missing something trivial, and the most likely of it is that I'm simply wrong on my understanding of the constructible universe $L$, or maybe one of the Wikipedia entries I'm about to ...
4
votes
1answer
74 views

Are there any large cardinal properties of the critical point of a $j: L \longrightarrow L$?

I've recently been thinking a bit about $L$ and $0 \sharp$. As is well known, the existence of $0 \sharp$ is equivalent to the existence of a non-trivial elementary embedding $j: L \longrightarrow ...
4
votes
2answers
477 views

Is this extension of ZFC known to be outright inconsistent?

Is the following first-order theory known to be outright inconsistent? Adjoin to ZFC a unary function $U$ together with the following axioms. If $\alpha$ is an ordinal, then there exists an ...
4
votes
1answer
158 views

Proof of “If $ZFC$ proves there is an inaccessible cardinal, then $ZFC$ is inconsistent”.

Let $I$ be the statement "there is an inaccessible cardinal". I'm aware of two proofs of "If $ZFC\vdash I$ then $ZFC$ is inconsistent". One proof uses the Second Incompleteness Theorem, which I ...
7
votes
1answer
208 views

Is there “intuition” as to why the Continuum Hypothesis is independent of most large cardinal axioms?

I could not find a question that seemed to answer my specific query, despite lots of material on the Continuum Hypothesis (CH) on MSE and MO. If there is already a question on this, I'd greatly ...
3
votes
1answer
51 views

$\{\alpha < \kappa \mid cf(\alpha) = \lambda\}$ is not ineffable

We call a subset $X \subseteq \kappa$ of a regular cardinal $\kappa$ ineffable, iff for every family $(A_\alpha \mid \alpha \in X)$ of subsets $A_\alpha \subseteq \alpha$, there is a stationary set $S ...
2
votes
0answers
57 views

Is consistency strength order dense?

Definition: Let $\sigma$, $\theta$ be two statement in the language of set theory. We say $\sigma <_{c} \theta$ ($\sigma$ is strictly lower than $\theta$ in consistency strength order) if within ...
3
votes
1answer
54 views

A question about second-order logic and inaccessible cardinals.

Let $\kappa$ denote an inaccessible cardinal, and suppose $T \in V_\kappa$ is a second-order theory. Now consider some mathematical structure $X \in V_\kappa$. Then I think it is clear that $X \models ...
3
votes
0answers
69 views

Expository Papers on Extenders

Extenders are discussed in many set theory text books. Here I am looking for some expository "papers" which are focused on this subject and its connection with forcing and large cardinals. More ...
0
votes
0answers
51 views

Similarity of the Universe $V$ and its $\kappa$-Fragments

Intuitively, if a cardinal $\kappa$ is "large" then the $\kappa$-fragment of the universe $V_{\kappa}$ is so "similar" to the entire universe $V$. For example if $\kappa$ is supercompact then ...
3
votes
1answer
98 views

$\aleph_\omega$ and large ordinals?

Assuming the GCH, each time you take the powerset of an aleph number, the subscript increases by one. So there is $\aleph_0, \aleph_1, \aleph_2\ldots \aleph_\omega\ldots \aleph_{\epsilon_0}\ldots$ and ...
2
votes
0answers
76 views

Proof of PFA from Supercompact

In Jech's proof (in chapter 31) that the consistency of a supercompact cardinal implies the consistency of PFA, he needs the following fact: Let $\mathbb{P}_\kappa$ be the countable support forcing ...
1
vote
0answers
51 views

Dual Constructions for Core Models

Roughly speaking, core models are inner models of ZFC which could contain some large cardinals. e.g. $L$ is the smallest core model and it is possible to have inaccessible, Mahlo, weakly compact, ...
0
votes
0answers
67 views

Large Cardinals with Elementary Extension Characterization

Question: Which large cardinals $\kappa$ have a characterization in the following form: $\kappa$ is large if and only if for all cardinals $\lambda>\kappa$, $\langle W_{\kappa},\in\rangle\prec ...
2
votes
1answer
48 views

Is the cardinality of the continuum weakly Mahlo?

Is $2^{\aleph_0}$ a weakly Mahlo cardinal? Can it be? That is, are there conditions (such as the negation of the continuum hypothesis or something) under which it is, and other conditions under which ...
1
vote
1answer
91 views

On the number of countable models of complete theories of models of ZFC [duplicate]

Fix the language of set theory $\mathcal{L}=\{\in\}$. Let $\langle M,\in\rangle$ be a set or proper class model of ZFC (e.g. $M$ could be $L$, $HOD$, $V_{\kappa}$ for some inaccessible cardinal ...
1
vote
1answer
42 views

how big is the smallest inaccessible cardinal?

I know a cardinal is inaccessible if it is uncountable,regular,strong limit.And we cannot prove its existence in ZFC.but by axiom of choice,every infinite cardinal is an aleph.so can you write the ...
2
votes
0answers
109 views

How large or small can the gap in Shelah's main gap theorem be, up to consistency?

Shelah's main gap theorem in model theory says: For each first order complete theory $T$ in a countable language if $I(T,\kappa)$ denotes the number of its models of size $\kappa$ then one of ...
2
votes
0answers
100 views

Why are large cardinal axioms actually axioms?

A cardinal is an isomorphism class in ZFC, or a representative of one. I'm not asking what the significant uses of large cardinals are, or why we would want to find them or construct them; I'm ...
2
votes
3answers
241 views

Is there a largest large cardinal?

In ZFC, a cardinal is an isomorphism class of sets. However ZFC doesn't explicitly have classes; NBG, which is a conservative extension of ZFC does. There is no largest cardinal by Cantors Theorem ...
4
votes
0answers
56 views

Let $\Phi$ denote the statement that $\mathrm{GCH}$ holds, and that no inaccessible cardinals exist. Is $\Phi$ limiting?

By an "inner model," let us mean a transitive subclass of the universe satisfying $\mathrm{ZFC}.$ Given that, here's an (intentionally) vague definition. Definition. Call a set of axioms $\Phi$ in ...
4
votes
0answers
80 views

How to think about iterated ultrapowers?

I would like to gain some basic intuition about iterated ultrapowers. I am perfectly happy with accepting the construction and can see that it fits into a fundamental role in many places (for example, ...
1
vote
1answer
39 views

Model for replacement

If $R_{k} $ is a model for replacement, is necesarly k a strong limit cardinal? And if k is a regular cardinal, are then equivalent the sentences: k is a strongly inaccesible cardinal if and only if ...
3
votes
2answers
131 views

Universe cardinals and models for ZFC

I'm reading through Joel David Hamkins' set theory lecture notes. On page 14, on the subject of inaccessible cardinals and submodels of ZFC in $V$, he defines a universe cardinal to be a cardinal ...
4
votes
1answer
111 views

A question regarding the status of CH in the Gitik model

Consider models of ZF+"Every uncountable cardinal is singular" (eg. Moti Gitik: "All uncountable cardinals can be singular", Israel journal of Mathematics, 35(1-2): 61-88, 1980). How should CH be ...
6
votes
1answer
79 views

Large cardinals and $V$

I am confused by something: $\mu$ is a large cardinal if $\lambda<\mu\Rightarrow 2^{\lambda}<\mu$ and any union of less than $\mu$ sets of size less than $\mu$ is less than $\mu$. On Wikipedia ...
1
vote
1answer
67 views

Question about rank into rank cardinals

I do not understand why λ is smaller than $\kappa_0$ if λ is the supremum of a growing sequence that starts at $\kappa_0$ (see definition below). From cantor's attic ...
2
votes
1answer
70 views

Are the objects associated with large cardinals still sets?

When set theorists speak of large cardinals, are they still referring to the cardinality of some collection? If so, is this object a (hypothetical) set, a proper class, or something else?
5
votes
1answer
87 views

Ineffable Cardinals and Critical Point of Elementary Embeddings

A cardinal $\kappa$ is a ineffable if and only if for all sequences $\langle A_\alpha : \alpha < \kappa\rangle$ such that $A_\alpha \subseteq \alpha$ for all $\alpha < \kappa$, then there exists ...
5
votes
1answer
61 views

Supercompact cardinals and being witnessed by a structure of limited rank

Supercompact cardinals have reflection properties. If a cardinal with some property (say a 3-huge cardinal) that is witnessed by a structure of limited rank exists above a supercompact cardinal ...
2
votes
1answer
42 views

Nonconstructible Subsets of Singular Cardinals

I am trying to understand the proof of Corollary 18.34 in Jech's Set Theory: If $0^\sharp$ does not exist, then if $\kappa$ is a singular cardinal and if there exists a nonconstructible subset of ...
5
votes
2answers
73 views

Removing sets from models of set theory

I have a naive and open-ended question: How can one remove a set from a model of set theory in such a way that the result is again a model of set theory? Directly related: what kinds of sets can ...