Questions about Gödel's incompleteness theorems and related topics.

learn more… | top users | synonyms

3
votes
2answers
173 views

Does $\Sigma_1 \cup \Pi_1$ generate the complete first order theory of arithmetic?

If a set $T$ of sentences in the language of arithmetic is deductively closed under the usual inference rules of first order logic, and includes all true $\Sigma_1$ sentences and all true $\Pi_1$ ...
6
votes
4answers
263 views

Second order logic question.

I'm reading Michael Potter's book "Set Theory and its Philosophy" and where he's explaining why he chose to use first-order predicate calculus with identity instead of second order logic to reason ...
2
votes
3answers
154 views

If $\newcommand\PA{\mathrm{PA}}\newcommand\Con{\operatorname{Con}}\Con(\PA)$, then $\Con(\PA+\Con(\PA))$?

Assume that $\PA$ is consistent. Then we know that $\PA$ cannot prove $\Con(\PA)$. I was wondering. Can $\PA$ prove that $$\Con(\PA) \Rightarrow \Con(\PA + \Con(\PA))?$$
6
votes
1answer
801 views

Are Real Numbers axioms a consistent or complete system?

Do we know if the axioms of the real numbers are consistent, complete or neither of both? And if so, is it a consequence of Godel's theorem or of something else?
7
votes
2answers
278 views

Proof of Proposition/Theorem V in Gödel's 1931 paper?

Proposition V in Gödel's famous 1931 paper is stated as follows: For every recursive relation $ R(x_{1},...,x_{n})$ there is an n-ary "predicate" $r$ (with "free variables" $u_1,...,u_n$) such that, ...
4
votes
1answer
128 views

How many digits of Chaitin's $\Omega$ constant would we know if we had a $\Sigma_1$-Oracle?

According to Wikipedia (and it seems intuitive from the definition itself), $\Omega$ is Turing equivalent to the halting problem and thus at level $\Delta_2^0$ of the arithmetical hierarchy. Do this ...
3
votes
2answers
126 views

Talking about Gödel's incompleteness theorems…

I will give a talk about Gödel's incompleteness theorems to a group of people consisting of undergraduates of mathematics, graduates of informatics and etc (they are not really familiar with the ...
4
votes
1answer
279 views

Understanding the syntactical completeness

A formal system is syntactically complete if for each sentence (closed formula) $\varphi$ either $\varphi$ or $\lnot \varphi$ is provable. A formal system is semantically complete if every ...
2
votes
2answers
132 views

What percentage of formulas is unprovable in a given axiomatic system?

I am trying to use language I am not familiar with, so bear with me. If I make no sense, I try to be clearer. Assume we are given a formal language. Assume $S$ is the set of every well-formed formula ...
4
votes
1answer
269 views

System with infinite number of axioms

Assume we have a set of axioms $A_0$. There exists a statement that can be formulated with these axioms that cannot be proven to be true with this system. Assume we give such a statement axiomatic ...
1
vote
1answer
77 views

One cannot know if a number could be written any shorter according to Gödel's incompleteness theorem

I am reading Tor Nørretranders (cannot find the English version, sry) and he states that Gödel's incompleteness theorem implies that we cannot know if we can write a number any shorter (e.g. ...
0
votes
1answer
402 views

URM computable indicating RAM computability

How can we show that every URM computable function is RAM computable? I can see that that from Church's thesis, URM Computability iff p.r., but now sure how to get this claim above. Taking the hint ...
4
votes
1answer
301 views

Gödel Completeness theorem

I realized recently that I did not understand well the completeness theorem of Godel, and how it interacts with the incompleteness theorems. What I understand now (and you will see my understanding ...
0
votes
1answer
69 views

Completeness and consistency of system of calculus

It is widely held that ZFC cannot be shown to be self-consistent or complete. So, what happens to the system of calculus? Can it be shown to be complete or self-consistent? (Edit: Oops. So, two ...
7
votes
2answers
112 views

Is Goedel term (in incomleteness theorem) both true and unproveable?

In Goedel incompleteness theorem is Goedel term both true and unproveable, or just unproveable and truth neutral? Can we add Goedel term to the theory as axiom and get new theory? Can we add Goedel ...
11
votes
1answer
148 views

Is there a quicker argument from the HBL derivability conditions to the equivalence of fixed points of $\neg\Box$ to $\mathsf{Con}$?

I'm just about to send off the final, final corrected PDF of the second edition of my Gödel book, and the following (neurotic?!?) question occurs to me. In discussing matters around and about the ...
4
votes
2answers
235 views

Sequent calculus and first incompletness theorem

Wikipedia says that sequent calculus is sound and complete (http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Sequent_calculus#Properties_of_the_system_LK). Godel first incompleteness theorem says that system capable of ...
2
votes
1answer
113 views

When and why does the Lindenbaum extension construction fail for second order theories?

From any consistent set of first order sentences $\Gamma$, one may generate by an inductive process a unique set of sentences $\Delta(\Gamma)$ such that $\forall A, \Gamma \models A \implies A \in ...
8
votes
1answer
339 views

Gödelian incompleteness; Smullyan's Puzzle

I am currently doing exercises on the Gödelian theorems; and we are confronted with the introductory puzzle of R. Smullyan's book, which is as follows: Suppose we have a machine which prints strings ...
1
vote
2answers
230 views

Gödel's Incompleteness Theorem — meta-reasoning “loophole”?

Gödel's Theorem says that I can construct a mathematical statement like "f(x1,x2,...,x_n)=0 has no integer solution", where it is impossible (in a certain system of axioms) to formally prove that it's ...
9
votes
4answers
443 views

“The set of all true statements of first order logic”

In one of my lectures, the lecturer put a bunch of examples of sets on the board, stuff like the set of all humans, set of all well typed programs in some programming language, the set of all true ...
2
votes
1answer
153 views

question about Gödel numbering

I have a question about Gödel numbering, it is trivial but I would like to know how can you know the length of an expression through its Gödel number. ¿? I think you can use a recursive function but ...
3
votes
1answer
135 views

Question about $\Sigma_n$-soundness

According to wikipedia (http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/%CE%A9-consistent_theory#Definition): "$\Sigma_n$-soundness has the following computational interpretation: if the theory proves that a program C ...
1
vote
2answers
165 views

Question about computability of true/provable formulas

I would like to clarify some things related to the computability of the sets of all theorems and true formulas for the formal arithmetic. Consider the theory $T$ of formal arithmetic (the theory of ...
1
vote
2answers
204 views

I do not understand why the Turing computable sets of N are exactly the sets at level $\Delta_1^0$ of the arithmetical hierarchy

The reason I don't understand it is this. Take for example the twin primes conjecture, which is $\Pi_2^0$. The set of twin primes is computable right? (there is a Turing machine that enumerates all of ...
1
vote
1answer
39 views

Finding polynomials with a specific property

I am stuck with the following problem. Show that there exist a $n \in \mathbb{N}$ and polynomials $p,q \in \mathbb{N}[x_1,\ldots,x_n]$ such that neither the formula $$ \phi(n,p,q) = \forall x_1 ...
1
vote
1answer
97 views

Is there a mechanical procedure within PA to reduce any ϕ to its simplest (in terms of the arithmetical hierarchy) logically equivalent form?

The question is motivated because we know that the Turing computable sets of natural numbers are exactly the sets at level $\Delta_1^0$ of the arithmetical hierarchy. We also know that the finite ...
4
votes
1answer
175 views

Is every φ above the second level of the arithmetical hierarchy independent of PA?

If I am not wrong, every $\Sigma_n$ (or $\Pi_n$ ) statement $\phi$ is equivalent to a statement that says that a given Turing machine halts (or doesn't halt) on input $C$ using a ...
1
vote
3answers
222 views

What is it wrong in this argument about the interpretability hierarchy?

This is a question that I fully reedited to make it more precise. Many thanks to the people that answered the previous version to get this distilled one. Background: (from ...
16
votes
6answers
2k views

Does Gödel's Incompleteness Theorem really say anything about the limitations of theoretical physics?

Stephen Hawking believes that Gödel's Incompleteness Theorem makes the search for a 'Theory of Everything' impossible. He reasons that because there exist mathematical results that cannot be proven, ...
1
vote
1answer
77 views

Given a φ independent of PA which is true in the standard model, will always (PA+ ¬φ) be Σn-unsound for some n?

Given a φ independent of PA which is true in the standard model, will always (PA+ ¬φ) be Σn-unsound for some n? This is a follow up from a previous question: Given a φ independent of PA which is true ...
9
votes
1answer
212 views

Given a φ independent of PA which is true in the standard model, will always (PA+ ¬φ) be ω-inconsistent?

Given a φ independent of PA which is true in the standard model, will always (PA+ ¬φ) be ω-inconsistent? Does it mean that every such ¬φ can be used to prove that a Turing machine halts on a given C ...
2
votes
3answers
104 views

Provability becoming decidable in a larger system?

Let $T$ be an effectively axiomatizable system that we believe to be consistent, and expressive enough so that Godel’s theorem applies to it. Then we have that the provability statements related to ...
9
votes
5answers
1k views

What does it mean for something to be true but not provable in peano arithmetic?

Specifically, the Paris-Harrington theorem. In what sense is it true? True in Peano arithmetic but not provable in Peano arithmetic, or true in some other sense?
4
votes
6answers
902 views

prove that it's not provable

Is it possible to prove that you can't prove some theorem? For example: Prove that you can't prove the Riemann hypothesis. I have a feeling it's not possible but I want to know for sure. Thanks in ...
20
votes
2answers
2k views

What is the prerequisite knowledge for learning Godel's incompleteness theorem

I am very interested in learning the incompleteness theorem and its proof. But first I must know what things I need to learn first. My current knowledge consists of basic high school education and the ...
6
votes
3answers
2k views

are there non-standard models of arithmetic in second order arithmetic?

non-standard models of arithmetic in second order arithmetic? Background: According to Godel's theorem, if we have, in a given consistent system S, a non-provable wff. A, then we can extend the ...
4
votes
1answer
151 views

Can decidability results for monadic second-order logic be extended to monadic higher-order logics?

Call a higher-order logic fully monadic if and only if all of its predicate constants (at any order) and higher-order variables (at any order) are monadic (and it has no function symbols). In Solvable ...
8
votes
2answers
282 views

Axiomatic system and Hilbert's 2nd problem

Hilbert's second problem asks if the axioms of arithmetic are consistent. Has this problem been resolved? Shouldn't an axiomatic system ideally be consistent and complete(given that we have the ...
34
votes
7answers
2k views

Why is the Continuum Hypothesis (not) true?

I'm making my way through Thomas W Hungerfords's seminal text "Abstract Algebra 2nd Edition w/ Sets, Logics and Categories" where he makes the statement that the Continuum Hypothesis (There does not ...
2
votes
1answer
285 views

About a step in the proof of Gödel-Rosser Theorem.

I am reading about the Gödel-Rosser Theorem, i.e. the Rosser's refinement of first Gödel's incompleteness Theorem, which states that if $\mathbf{PA}$ is consistent then it is incomplete. I am posting ...
9
votes
3answers
2k views

Consistency of Peano axioms (Hilbert's second problem)?

(Putting aside for the moment that Wikipedia might not be the best source of knowledge.) I just came across this Wikipedia paragraph on the Peano-Axioms: The vast majority of contemporary ...
1
vote
2answers
235 views

Is there a non-contradictory non-trivial axiomatic system in which Gödel's theorem is undecidable?

Gödel's Incompleteness Theorem states that in any non-contradictory non-trivial axiomatic system there are certain statements or theorems whom cannot be proved in that system, For example in ZFC, ...
0
votes
2answers
583 views

What is actually “relatively consistent”?

Gödel's incompleteness theorem states that: "if a system is consistent, it is not complete." And it's well known that there are unprovable statements in ZF, e.g. GCH, AC, etc. However, why does this ...
5
votes
3answers
631 views

Is the negation of the Gödel sentence always unprovable too?

The incompleteness theorem says that certain theories+deduction system contain at least one sentence (the Gödel sentence "$G$"), which can't be proven (in the system in which it holds). (i) Is ...
2
votes
1answer
200 views

A qualitative, yet precise statement of Godel's incompleteness theorem?

I read online a statement to the effect that (I'm paraphrasing): Goedel's incompleteness theorem shows that we cannot even have a complete and consistent theory for the natural numbers. I am ...
4
votes
5answers
316 views

Gödel says: countable proofs, uncountable conjectures?

I thought I understood Gödel's Incompleteness Theorem to say: Starting from ZF, there only a countable number of proofs you can write The number of possible conjectures is uncountable. Thus, ...
4
votes
3answers
389 views

Aftermath of the incompletness theorem proof

This is somewhat of a minor point about the incompletness theorem, but I'm always a little unsure: So one proves that there is a formula which is unprovable in the theory of consideration. Okay, at ...
3
votes
1answer
142 views

properties of the provability predicate applied to open formulas

Good day! Let $\mathrm{T}$ be a first-order theory which contains the Peano arithmetic and has a recursively enumerable set of axioms. It is well known that one can construct a predicate ...
11
votes
5answers
1k views

Is there a proof of Gödel's Incompleteness Theorem without self-referential statements?

For the proof of Gödel's Incompleteness Theorem, most versions of proof use basically self-referential statements. My question is, what if one argues that Gödel's Incompleteness Theorem only matters ...