Questions about Gödel's incompleteness theorems and related topics.

learn more… | top users | synonyms

5
votes
4answers
143 views

Is every theorem of PA true in the standard model of number theory $N$?

My understanding is that every theorem $\phi$ of $PA$ is true in $N$ because $N$ is a model for $PA$, $N\models PA$. By completeness of first order logic, "$PA\vdash\phi$" implies that "if $N\models ...
4
votes
1answer
234 views

Under the impact of Gödel's incompleteness theorems, are the conclusions of statistics reliable?

After I read the Gödel's incompleteness theorems, I am confused about the following: Could you tell me if the conclusions of mathematical statistics are reliable? Gödel's incompleteness theorems ...
0
votes
1answer
41 views

Are there complete formal systems?

I am relatively new to logic, so forgive my ignorance. My question is: Are there any formal systems that are deemed complete? If so, how did we prove they were complete and which are they?
2
votes
1answer
41 views

Completeness of a Sub Theory of Number Theory

When I was an undergraduate I had a philosophy professor tell me that if you took the axioms of number theory with only addition or only multiplication then the resulting theory was decidable. It is ...
2
votes
2answers
114 views

clarify the term “arithmetics” when talking about Gödel's incompleteness theorems

I am not quite sure what really is meant when talking about "arithmetics" in context of Gödel's incompleteness theorems. How I so far understand it: Gödel proved that every sufficiently powerful ...
0
votes
1answer
90 views

differentiate the terms deductive system, model/structure, formal system, first-order logic

I can not bring the terms deductive system, model/structure, formal system, first-order logic into order in my head ;-) It seems to me that they are not overly used in a consistent manner and ...
2
votes
0answers
83 views

Minimal number of variables in a ZFC-undecidable sentence?

Let $\phi$ be a sentence of set theory. In Prenex form, $\phi$ can be written $$ {\bf Q}_1 x_1 {\bf Q}_2 x_2 \ldots {\bf Q}_n x_n \ \ \psi(x_1,x_2, \ldots ,x_n) $$ where each ${\mathbf Q}_i$ is ...
10
votes
1answer
155 views

Problem with completeness theorem and $\mathsf{Con(ZFC)}$

Using the reflection theorem we can prove in $\mathsf{ZFC}$ that for any finite $\Lambda\subseteq\mathsf{ZFC}$ there is some limit ordinal $\gamma$ such that $R(\gamma)\models\Lambda$. Then by the ...
2
votes
1answer
54 views

Are forcing techniques possible to automate for mechanized reasoning?

Looking at Cohen's success at proving independence of the Axiom of Choice and the Continuum Hypothesis, I was wondering if it was possible to mechanize forcing techniques for the purpose of proving ...
6
votes
2answers
167 views

What is the notion of truth used in Godels incompleteness theorem?

First-order logic is complete & sound. The notion of truth used here is model-theoretic. Informally Godels incompleteness theorem says that for a sufficiently strong formal language there are ...
2
votes
2answers
69 views

Completeness condition in Gödel first incompleteness theorem superflous

Wikipedia says: Theory is complete if it is a maximal consistent set of sentences. Than it says: Any effectively generated theory capable of expressing elementary arithmetic cannot be both ...
3
votes
1answer
82 views

Looking for counterexamples where the output of a computable function always has a computably checkable property, but PA cannot prove this

Suppose we have a computable function $f$, say over the naturals, and a decidable set $S$ of naturals, such that $f(x) \in S$ for all $x$. In this case, for any specific $x$, there is some specific ...
10
votes
2answers
723 views

Examples of statements which are true but not provable

Speaking informally and working, for example, in Peano Arithmetic (PA), we know that the essence of the Gödel's first incompleteness theorem is that there are true statements (in our model PA), which ...
5
votes
2answers
265 views

$\omega$-consistency and related terms

We know that a theory $T$ is $\omega$-inconsistent if there is a formula $\psi$ such that $T$ proves $(\exists x)\psi(x)$, and $T$ also proves $\lnot \psi(n)$ separately for each standard natural ...
2
votes
1answer
76 views

In Godel's first incompleteness theorem, what is the appropriate notion of interpretation function?

Wikipedia states Godel's first incompleteness as follows. Any effectively generated theory capable of expressing elementary arithmetic cannot be both consistent and complete. In particular, for ...
2
votes
5answers
698 views

Are (some) axioms “unprovable truths” of Godel's Incompleteness Theorem?

Like any math newbie, Godel's Incompleteness Theorems are easy to understand in general layman's terms, but difficult to understand beyond the typical "liar's paradox" and "barber's paradox" type ...
9
votes
2answers
452 views

Where, specifically, did Principia Mathematica fail?

I'm very fascinated by the book Principia Mathematica. From what I've learned so far, Principia Mathematica set out to be, essentially, the bible of mathematics and logic, from which all mathematical ...
1
vote
1answer
81 views

Have I understood the whole Incompleteness business correctly?

I am reading Gödel-Escher-Bach and a good dialogue by Eliezer Yudkowsky and I think I might have understood the nature of the Completeness and Incompleteness theorems (at least regarding Peano ...
1
vote
3answers
106 views

On consistency of axiomatic systems

Can an axiomatic system (which is capable of expressing arithmetic) be complete and consistent? Let me explain my motivation a little bit (though it can be a kind of a mess...) I'm aware of Goedel's ...
5
votes
2answers
123 views

Running programs in nonstandard models of PA

I came across the following problem in several places, to paraphrase: Let $T$ be a recursively axiomatizable, consistent extension of PA. Then there exists some $e$ such that the $e'$th program ...
49
votes
13answers
7k views

Can someone explain Gödel's incompleteness theorems in layman terms?

Can you explain it in a fathomable way at high school level?
6
votes
1answer
201 views

Are the Godel's incompleteness theorems valid for both classical and intuitionistic logic?

I am studying an undergraduate text about math logic. The proofs of the two Godel's incompleteness theorems are not completely formal: they are admittedly simpler that the real proofs. For what I ...
3
votes
2answers
291 views

Proving and understanding the Fixed point lemma (Diagonal Lemma) in Logic - used in proof of Godel's incompleteness theorem

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Diagonal_lemma I am wondering about the proof of the "Fixed-Point Lemma" $\text{Mod } \Sigma$ is the class of all models of $ \Sigma$. $\text{Th Mod } \Sigma$ is the set ...
0
votes
1answer
49 views

Definability of Kolmogorov Complexity?

This paper claims to have a proof of Godel's Second Incompleteness Theorem using Kolmogorov Complexity: http://www.ams.org/notices/201011/rtx101101454p.pdf As far as I can tell, it seems to assume ...
4
votes
1answer
185 views

How to prove primitive recursive functions are definable in Peano Arithmetic?

Background: I'm working on a talk that presents Godel's first Incompleteness Theorem from a computability-theoretic perspective. The idea is to show that the first incompleteness theorem follows from ...
3
votes
2answers
347 views

Don't Gödel's completeness and incompleteness theorems contradict each other? [duplicate]

Gödel's completeness theorem: Given a set of axioms, if we cannot derive a contradiction, then the system of axioms must be consistent. Gödel's incompleteness theorem:'Given any consistent, ...
4
votes
1answer
95 views

Incompleteness theorem and $\mathbb{L}$.

Let $\alpha > \omega$ and $u = \{\ulcorner \sigma \urcorner : \sigma \in \mathrm{Th}(\mathbb{L}_\alpha, \in)\} \subseteq \omega$, where by $\mathbb{L}_\alpha$ we denote as usual the constructible ...
6
votes
2answers
294 views

Can an unprovable statement be interpreted as being generally true in some cases?

For example, let's say that Goldbach's conjecture turns out to be unprovable. This would mean that a program cannot devise a way to check whether any counterexample exists. This seems to mean that ...
1
vote
1answer
51 views

Can ZFC+A and ZFC+negation of A be both inconsistent where A is some conjecture?

So I know that a conjecture/statement or negation of it plus ZFC can both turn out to be consistent, which means that a statement is not provable. But I would like to go opposite way - and let's say ...
1
vote
1answer
168 views

Decidable and recursively-axiomatizable theories

A few questions: If $T$ is a decidable and consistent theory, can there be any theory $T' \subset T$ that isn't decidable? Is there a decidable theory which isn't complete? How can I prove that any ...
10
votes
2answers
382 views

Is Gödel's incompleteness theorem provable without any model-theoretic notion?

The entry on Gödel's incompletenss theorem in Wikipedia says: Any effectively generated theory capable of expressing elementary arithmetic cannot be both consistent and complete. In particular, ...
6
votes
2answers
182 views

How is the standard model of number theory specified, and why can't we use that specification to prove any number theoretical sentence of interest?

According to Gödel's incompleteness theorem, there exists a sentence $G$ in the vocabulary of number theory ($N$) which is not provable from any (recursively enumerable) consistent set of axioms $T$, ...
5
votes
3answers
156 views

Gödel's incompleteness wrt weakend versions of ZFC

Suppose for the sake of argument that we look at ZFC with the axiom of infinity removed. http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/G%C3%B6del%27s_incompleteness_theorems#First_incompleteness_theorem ...
3
votes
1answer
72 views

Complexity of transforming an indirect proof into a direct one

Suppose that ZFC is consistent, and let ZFC'=ZFC+Con(ZFC). We can define a reasonable notion of the length of a proof inside ZFC', such that for any $n$ the set $P_n$ of all proofs of length $\leq n$ ...
4
votes
1answer
58 views

Special undecidability situation

Suppose that ZFC is consistent, and let ZFC'=ZFC+Con(ZFC). Can one construct two statements $\phi_1$ and $\phi_2$ such that $$ ZFC' \vdash ((ZFC \vdash \phi_1) \ \text{or} \ (ZFC \vdash \phi_2)) $$ ...
3
votes
2answers
141 views

Does $\Sigma_1 \cup \Pi_1$ generate the complete first order theory of arithmetic?

If a set $T$ of sentences in the language of arithmetic is deductively closed under the usual inference rules of first order logic, and includes all true $\Sigma_1$ sentences and all true $\Pi_1$ ...
6
votes
4answers
196 views

Second order logic question.

I'm reading Michael Potter's book "Set Theory and its Philosophy" and where he's explaining why he chose to use first-order predicate calculus with identity instead of second order logic to reason ...
2
votes
3answers
144 views

If $\newcommand\PA{\mathrm{PA}}\newcommand\Con{\operatorname{Con}}\Con(\PA)$, then $\Con(\PA+\Con(\PA))$?

Assume that $\PA$ is consistent. Then we know that $\PA$ cannot prove $\Con(\PA)$. I was wondering. Can $\PA$ prove that $$\Con(\PA) \Rightarrow \Con(\PA + \Con(\PA))?$$
4
votes
1answer
553 views

Are Real Numbers axioms a consistent or complete system?

Do we know if the axioms of the real numbers are consistent, complete or neither of both? And if so, is it a consequence of Godel's theorem or of something else?
7
votes
2answers
226 views

Proof of Proposition/Theorem V in Gödel's 1931 paper?

Proposition V in Gödel's famous 1931 paper is stated as follows: For every recursive relation $ R(x_{1},...,x_{n})$ there is an n-ary "predicate" $r$ (with "free variables" $u_1,...,u_n$) such that, ...
4
votes
1answer
103 views

How many digits of Chaitin's $\Omega$ constant would we know if we had a $\Sigma_1$-Oracle?

According to Wikipedia (and it seems intuitive from the definition itself), $\Omega$ is Turing equivalent to the halting problem and thus at level $\Delta_2^0$ of the arithmetical hierarchy. Do this ...
3
votes
2answers
116 views

Talking about Gödel's incompleteness theorems…

I will give a talk about Gödel's incompleteness theorems to a group of people consisting of undergraduates of mathematics, graduates of informatics and etc (they are not really familiar with the ...
4
votes
1answer
195 views

Understanding the syntactical completeness

A formal system is syntactically complete if for each sentence (closed formula) $\varphi$ either $\varphi$ or $\lnot \varphi$ is provable. A formal system is semantically complete if every ...
2
votes
2answers
116 views

What percentage of formulas is unprovable in a given axiomatic system?

I am trying to use language I am not familiar with, so bear with me. If I make no sense, I try to be clearer. Assume we are given a formal language. Assume $S$ is the set of every well-formed formula ...
3
votes
1answer
192 views

System with infinite number of axioms

Assume we have a set of axioms $A_0$. There exists a statement that can be formulated with these axioms that cannot be proven to be true with this system. Assume we give such a statement axiomatic ...
1
vote
1answer
76 views

One cannot know if a number could be written any shorter according to Gödel's incompleteness theorem

I am reading Tor Nørretranders (cannot find the English version, sry) and he states that Gödel's incompleteness theorem implies that we cannot know if we can write a number any shorter (e.g. ...
0
votes
1answer
393 views

URM computable indicating RAM computability

How can we show that every URM computable function is RAM computable? I can see that that from Church's thesis, URM Computability iff p.r., but now sure how to get this claim above. Taking the hint ...
4
votes
1answer
260 views

Gödel Completeness theorem

I realized recently that I did not understand well the completeness theorem of Godel, and how it interacts with the incompleteness theorems. What I understand now (and you will see my understanding ...
0
votes
1answer
65 views

Completeness and consistency of system of calculus

It is widely held that ZFC cannot be shown to be self-consistent or complete. So, what happens to the system of calculus? Can it be shown to be complete or self-consistent? (Edit: Oops. So, two ...
7
votes
2answers
105 views

Is Goedel term (in incomleteness theorem) both true and unproveable?

In Goedel incompleteness theorem is Goedel term both true and unproveable, or just unproveable and truth neutral? Can we add Goedel term to the theory as axiom and get new theory? Can we add Goedel ...