Tagged Questions

The tag has no wiki summary.

3answers
107 views

Is there such a thing as the number of axioms?

This question was inspired by this question. Does it really make sense to say that a formal system has some number of axioms, say three, or ten, etc? E.g., take a formal system that admits ...
2answers
44 views

Help with semi-formal logic

How do I write semi-formally 'there are only 2 objects in the universe'? My hypothesis is: ∃x∃y(x≠y) Any ideas?
4answers
62 views

semantics(truth) vs formal system?

my first question is can we just define semantics in logic and not define a formal system ? why do we need a formal system to prove a proposition when for example we know the proposition is true ? ...
0answers
76 views

Intuition for the choice of background (set) theory

Problem From the formalist point of view, any mathematical statement should ultimately be an assertion about the derivability of a certain formula in a certain formal system, call it the background ...
3answers
285 views

How do you go about formalizing a concept?

I am reading Godel Escher Bach. I love it. In the first few chapters, the author shows what a formal system is and gives examples that eventually lead to a typographical formal system of strings that ...
1answer
100 views

how to prove : there are an infinite number of points on the circle

I think the follow problem is equal to the problem set 1.16.(a) in Principles of Mathematical Analysis (walter ruldin), And we take (a, b) in $R^2$, X in $R^i$ how to prove : there are an infinite ...
2answers
177 views

How many undecidable statements are there in ZFC?

There are several statements known to be undecidable in ZFC, with the continuum hypothesis probably being the most "popular" one. Is it known how many undecidable statements are there in ZFC? I.e. ...
0answers
23 views

Do automatons and formal grammars belong to formal systems

A formal system consists of a formal language, a formal grammar that generates the language, a set of axioms, and a set of inference rules. Are automatons also formal systems? Is an automaton ...
1answer
127 views

What does “calculus” mean?

"calculus" and "formal system" From http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Propositional_calculus#Terminology a calculus is a formal system that consists of a set of syntactic expressions ...
1answer
38 views

theory, theorems and axioms

According to Wikipedia In mathematical logic, a theory (also called a formal theory) is a set of sentences in a formal language. Usually a deductive system is understood from context. An ...
0answers
40 views

Meaning of abstractness and concreteness

Do abstractness and concreteness mean for formal systems and their models respectively? Do they relate to how big the theory is? For example, the theory of rings is richer than the theory of ...
3answers
85 views

Are axioms assumed to be true in a formal system?

In a logical system, there is assignment of truth values to the sentences in the language, and axioms are assigned the true value. A logical system is a formal system. In a formal system, there is ...
2answers
78 views

Are there formal systems that are not logical systems?

From WIkipedia A logical system or, for short, logic, is a formal system together with a form of semantics, usually in the form of model-theoretic interpretation, which assigns truth values to ...
1answer
36 views

What do “completely described” and “complete formalisation” mean?

From Wikipedia In mathematics, an axiomatic system is any set of axioms from which some or all axioms can be used in conjunction to logically derive theorems. A mathematical theory consists of ...
1answer
44 views

What are the differences between a collation and a rule of formation?

I'm a beginner in mathematical logic, and currently studying(myself, without any colleague, which is sad and so asking in here) basics of formal system. Before asking a question, I'll introduce my ...
0answers
41 views

Are there any formal theories that are not axiomatic?

Are there any formal theories that are not axiomatic? Could you give me some examples?
1answer
72 views

How do definitions work in Martin-Lof type theory?

The classical viewpoint is that we can found mathematics by specifying a formal system $F$ whose theorems are precisely those of ZFC. However, since $F$ has essentially no support for the concept of a ...
2answers
159 views

Precisely, what is a primitive recursive definition?

If I understand correctly, the language of primitive recursive arithmetic has a distinguished function symbol $S$, together with a function symbol for each primitive recursive definition (hereafter ...
2answers
101 views

If $T$ proves any incorrect $\forall$-rudimentary sentence, then $T$ is inconsistent

A theory $T$ in the language of arithmetic is called $\omega$-inconsistent if for some formula $F(x)$, $\exists x F(x)$ is a theorem of $T$, but so is $\neg F(n)$ for each natural number $n$. ...
0answers
38 views

The role of verifiable computing in the formalization of mathematics

I've been thinking about this for a while, and it seems to me that mathematics "works" because (in principle) we can to check proofs very quickly, even though the discovery of that proof may have ...
1answer
50 views

Prove the admissibility of $\Gamma, A \vdash_N B$, from $\Gamma \vdash_N B$

(This is an assignment) To prove: $$\frac{\Gamma \vdash_N B}{\Gamma, A \vdash_N B}$$ ($\Gamma, A = \Gamma \cup \{A\}$) I have what I think is a proof for this. I would like and be grateful for ...
0answers
57 views

Certain sequents as inference rules

Fix a signature $\sigma.$ Then a coherent formula is a first-order formula built using only $\{\wedge,\vee,\top,\bot,\exists\}.$ See the link for more information. Furthermore, by a "special" ...
2answers
110 views

Textbook on Basics of Formal Systems

Whilst trying to learn more about logic I came across Smullyan's Theory of Formal Systems on Google Books. What I liked about the book was how clearly it managed to describe (on pages 3-5 in chapter ...
2answers
166 views

1answer
189 views

Some different versions of completeness of a formal system, of a logic and of a theory

I have seen people talking about Gödel's complete theorems and Gödel's incomplete theorems on math.SE. I am curious what they are really about, so I try to understand the meaning of completeness ...
3answers
361 views

Aftermath of the incompletness theorem proof

This is somewhat of a minor point about the incompletness theorem, but I'm always a little unsure: So one proves that there is a formula which is unprovable in the theory of consideration. Okay, at ...
3answers
274 views

Why can't we use memoization to parse unambiguous context-free grammars in linear time?

This is a follow-up question to Why is it hard to parse unambiguous context-free grammar in linear time? I know that Parsing Expression Grammars (PEG) can be parsed in linear time using a packrat ...
1answer
69 views

Satisfiability problem for FOL[<,R]

Let FOL[<,R] be the fragment of first-order logic enriched with two relational symbols < and R and the first-order axioms that say: < is a strict partial order and R is an irreflexive and ...
1answer
165 views

Definition and meaning of “Proof Schema”, “Class Sign”

I'm a newbie in advanced mathematics, and I'm trying to understand Godel's theorem. I came across these two words which I couldn't understand clearly. "Proof Schema" and "Class-Sign" Can anybody ...
2answers
346 views

Why is it hard to parse unambiguous context-free grammar in linear time?

From this question, I gather that whether unambiguous CF grammar can be parsed in linear time is an open problem. I'd like to know what the major roadblocks to achieve this are. That is, what made the ...
2answers
650 views

Determining if a grammar can be converted to LL(1)/LL(k)

(This is a cross-post of http://cstheory.stackexchange.com/questions/11676/determining-if-a-grammar-can-be-converted-to-ll1-llk in the hopes of gaining a wider audience.) I'd like to know if there is ...
1answer
305 views

Differences between the formal grammar, formation rules and automaton for a formal language

Added: A formal grammar is a set of formation rules for strings in a formal language. Formation rules are rules for describing which strings of symbols formed from the alphabet of a formal language ...
0answers
212 views

Summation notation and a negative sign of some elements

Having sequence like $$\beta_1 \cos\theta_1 + \beta_2 \cos\theta_2 + \beta_3 \cos\theta_3 + \dots + \beta_n \cos\theta_n$$ it is possible to present it using summation notation as follows:  ...
1answer
125 views

How it is possible that sound system is inconsistent

We have some sound deduction system (every provable sentence is true), which has property of principle of explosion and some theory T described in that system. Lets assume that theory T is ...
2answers
385 views

How it is posible that $\omega$-inconsistency does not lead to inconsistency

After wikipedia: Theory is $\omega$-inconsistent if, for some property P of natural numbers, T proves P(0), P(1), P(2), and so on (that is, for every standard natural number n, T proves that P(n) ...
1answer
261 views

What are metatheory, metalanguage and meta-…

I have been reading the Wiki articles for metatheory and metalanguage, but not sure if I have understood what they are about. Some accessible examples may help clarify a bit, I guess. Do metatheory ...
2answers
127 views

Does a formal system having inference rules imply that it is a logic system?

From Wikipedia Formal systems in mathematics consist of the following elements: A finite set of symbols (i.e. the alphabet), that can be used for constructing formulas (i.e. finite ...
1answer
118 views

What is the minimal axiomatization of a set of structures?

I wonder what the minimal axiomatization of a set of structures mean? I came across this term from Wikipedia: For a theory $T\in A,$ let $F(T)$ be the set of all structures that satisfy the ...
1answer
34 views

Are interpretation and formalization inverse to each other?

I am not sure if I understand this correctly. Please correct me. In a formal system, an interpretation is a mapping from its formal language to one of its structures ie models. an ...
0answers
301 views

Understanding definition of conservative extension of a theory

From Wikipedia In mathematical logic, a logical theory $T_2$ is a (proof theoretic) conservative extension of a theory $T_1$ if the language of $T_2$ extends the language of $T_1$; every ...
3answers
929 views

Hofstadter's TNT: b is a power of 2 - is my formula doing what it is supposed to?

If you've read Hofstadter's Gödel, Escher, Bach, you must have come across the problem of expressing 'b is a power of 2' in Typographical Number Theory. An alternative way to say this is that every ...