Mathematics Stack Exchange is a question and answer site for people studying math at any level and professionals in related fields. It's 100% free, no registration required.

Sign up
Here's how it works:
  1. Anybody can ask a question
  2. Anybody can answer
  3. The best answers are voted up and rise to the top

Sorry for asking this simple things... First I will put the results that are used. I have a stupid question about the proof of the corollary.enter image description here

I don´t know totally how to use the proposition 1.1, because I can guarantee that there exist a maximal ideal of $ A/a $ of the form $ a+J $ using the hint. And now? clearly it´s natural in consider the preimage of the projection $\pi^{-1}(a+J)$ since it is an ideal of A , but not necessarily a maximal ideal. So what can I do?

share|cite|improve this question
Why is it not maximal? – Mariano Suárez-Alvarez Jan 16 '12 at 22:09
"[$\ldots$] there exist[s] a maximal ideal of $A/a$ of the form $a+J$ [$\ldots$]". Ehm... I think you're using "$a$" here two mean two different things. Notice how the book you're quoting is using \mathfrak for ideals. – kahen Jan 16 '12 at 22:11

Suppose $J$ is a maximal ideal of $A/\mathfrak{a}$. Then $\phi^{-1}(J)$ is an ideal of $A$, and if $I$ is any ideal of $A$ with $\phi^{-1}(J)\subseteq I\subseteq A$, then applying $\phi$, we get $J\subseteq \phi(I)\subseteq A/\mathfrak{a}$ (this is because the correspondence is order-preserving, and $\phi(\phi^{-1}(J))=J$ because, as a quotient map, $\phi$ is surjective). Because $J$ is a maximal ideal of $A/\mathfrak{a}$, this implies that either $\phi(I)=J$ or $\phi(I)=A/\mathfrak{a}$. Thus, applying $\phi^{-1}$, we have that either $I=\phi^{-1}(J)$ or $I=A$. Thus, $\phi^{-1}(J)$ is a maximal ideal of $A$ containing $\phi^{-1}(0)=\mathfrak{a}$.

share|cite|improve this answer
Thanks Zev , now I have a question related. If I have a ring homomorphism $ f: A \to B $ and J is a maximal ideal of B , then it´s not always true that $f^-1 (J) $ it´s a maximal ideal of A , example $ A = {\Bbb Z},B = Q,J = \left( 0 \right) $ but I don´t like this example , and I don´t have more, there exist conditions that ensure that the preimage of a maximal ideal must also be maximal? ( for example in A and $A/a $ it´s an example , as we seen ) – August Jan 16 '12 at 22:20
@August If $f$ is surjective then this is the case, as then $B$ is isomorphic to $A/\mathfrak{a}$ for some ideal $\mathfrak{a}\subseteq A$. – Alex Becker Jan 16 '12 at 23:37
@August There are certain classes of ring homomorphisms $f:A\rightarrow B$ that have this property. Surjective ring homomorphisms, and more generally, finite ring homomorphisms (homomorphisms making $B$ into a finitely generated $A$-module), and more generally still, integral ring homomorphisms have the property. Another class of homomorphisms for which this holds consists of the homomorphisms of finite type with $A$ a Jacobson ring. Another non-example is the inclusion of $\mathbb{Z}$ into $\mathbb{Q}[[T]]$ (the power series over $\mathbb{Q}$). The inverse image of the maximal ideal $(T)$ is – Keenan Kidwell Jan 17 '12 at 0:45
the zero ideal of $\mathbb{Z}$. I don't know if you'd like this better than your example of $\mathbb{Z}\rightarrow\mathbb{Q}$ though. – Keenan Kidwell Jan 17 '12 at 0:47

There is some maximal ideal of $A/\mathfrak{a}$. By (1.1) it has a preimage $\mathfrak{a}'$ in $A$ which contains $\mathfrak{a}$, which must be maximal as if $I\supset \mathfrak{a}'$ then $\pi(I)\supset \pi(\mathfrak{a}')$ (as by (1.1) these are distinct), which contradicts the maximality of $\pi(\mathfrak{a}')$.

share|cite|improve this answer

Your Answer


By posting your answer, you agree to the privacy policy and terms of service.

Not the answer you're looking for? Browse other questions tagged or ask your own question.