Mathematics Stack Exchange is a question and answer site for people studying math at any level and professionals in related fields. Join them; it only takes a minute:

Sign up
Here's how it works:
  1. Anybody can ask a question
  2. Anybody can answer
  3. The best answers are voted up and rise to the top

I'm new to the hypergeometric series, and I'm trying to decipher a proof in which the author identifies a particular finite sum as a a hypergeometric series. The particular summation is:

$$ \begin{array}{l} \sum_{j=0}^{k}\frac{(-n)_j(n+\alpha+\beta+1)_j(-k)_j}{(m-k+1)_j(-m-\gamma-\delta-k)_jj!}\times \\ \sum_{l=0}^{m+n-k}\frac{(-m-n+k)_l(m-n+\gamma+\delta+k+1)_l(\gamma+\alpha+k+1)_l}{(\gamma-n+k+1)_l(\alpha+\beta+\gamma+\delta+2k+2)_ll!}= \\ _3F_2\left(\begin{array}{c} -n, & n+\alpha+\beta+1, & -k; & 1 \\ -m-\gamma-\delta-k, & m-k+1 \end{array}\right)\times \\ _3F_2\left(\begin{array}{c} -n-m+k, & m-n+\gamma+\delta+k+1, & \alpha+\gamma+k+1; & 1 \\ \gamma-n+k+1, & \alpha+\beta+\gamma+\delta+2k+2 \end{array}\right)\end{array} $$

My question is:
Why is this equality true if the upper limits on the sums are finite?

All of the definitions that I have seen for the hypergeometric functions give infinite upper limits (e.g. Abramowitz & Stegun [1], and Wolfram's function site [2]).


share|cite|improve this question
Because $(-k)_i=0$ for every integers $i\geqslant k+1\geqslant1$. – Did Jan 16 '12 at 20:34
And in general, the cases where a hypergeometric function turns out to be a polynomial are the ones in which the coefficients turn out to be eventually $0$. – Robert Israel Jan 16 '12 at 20:47
Thanks, that makes sense now. – okj Jan 16 '12 at 21:03
up vote 3 down vote accepted

Let's examine the first hypergeometric series : $$_3F_2\left(\begin{array}{c} -n, & n+\alpha+\beta+1, & -k; & 1 \\ -m-\gamma-\delta-k, & m-k+1 \end{array}\right)$$

Applying the definition you get : $$\sum_{j=0}^{\infty}\frac{(-n)_j(n+\alpha+\beta+1)_j(-k)_j}{(-m-\gamma-\delta-k)_j(m-k+1)_jj!}1^j$$

$(-k)_j$ is of course the rising factorial : $(-k)_0=1$, $(-k)_j=(-k)(-k+1)\cdots(-k+j-1)$

We simply get $(-k)_j=0$ as soon as $j\gt k$ (if $k$ is a nonnegative integer) because $0$ will appear in the rising factorial and we may stop the sum at k. Note that the sum could stop earlier (for example if $n$ is a smaller nonnegative integer than $k$) but this is not excluded by interrupting the sum at $k$.

The same applies to the other hypergeometric series since the firt term is $-n-m+k$ that will become $(-n-m+k)_l$ that is $0$ for $l\gt n+m-k$.

To resume : It seems just to be a straightforward translation in both cases!

share|cite|improve this answer
Thanks a lot. That makes sense now. I appreciate the help! – okj Jan 16 '12 at 21:00

Your Answer


By posting your answer, you agree to the privacy policy and terms of service.

Not the answer you're looking for? Browse other questions tagged or ask your own question.