Mathematics Stack Exchange is a question and answer site for people studying math at any level and professionals in related fields. Join them; it only takes a minute:

Sign up
Here's how it works:
  1. Anybody can ask a question
  2. Anybody can answer
  3. The best answers are voted up and rise to the top

I have one query, concerning the newest edition of this monograph.

  1. At page 7, section 1.2, at the bottom of the page, it's written that: " It is easily seen that $\zeta(s)=2$ for $s=\alpha$, where $\alpha$ is a real number greater than 1..."

I am quite sure that for $\alpha=2$ which is real and greater than 1, $ \zeta(s)=\frac{\pi^2}{6} \neq 2$, what do you think did Titchamarsh meant here?!

Thanks in advance.

share|cite|improve this question
Irrelevant comment: I looked for Titchmarsh on Google Books, and they appear to have it filed under "Architecture > History > General"! – David Loeffler Jan 16 '12 at 16:03
up vote 4 down vote accepted

I will take a stab at this. I think he is saying that for some real number $s > 1$, $\zeta(s) = 2.$ We know that on the interval $(1,\infty)$ the $\zeta$ function is continuous and monotonically decreasing. Since $\zeta(t) \to \infty$ as $t \downarrow 1$ and $\zeta(2) = \pi^2/6 < 2$, there must be some $s \in(1,2)$ with $\zeta(s) = 2.$

His writing somewhat obscures the existential nature of the statement he is making.

share|cite|improve this answer
In short, T is saying $\zeta(\alpha)=2$ for some $\alpha$, not claiming $\zeta(\alpha)=2$ for every $\alpha$. – Gerry Myerson Jan 16 '12 at 20:44
I wonder why T is cheap with words. Thanks. – MathematicalPhysicist Jan 17 '12 at 9:59

Your Answer


By posting your answer, you agree to the privacy policy and terms of service.

Not the answer you're looking for? Browse other questions tagged or ask your own question.