Mathematics Stack Exchange is a question and answer site for people studying math at any level and professionals in related fields. Join them; it only takes a minute:

Sign up
Here's how it works:
  1. Anybody can ask a question
  2. Anybody can answer
  3. The best answers are voted up and rise to the top

I am currently reading a book where the author says that the tangent and cotangent bundles $TM$ and $T^*M$ of a manifold $M$ are complexified.

I am not familiar with Complex Manifolds so looked it up on Wikipedia.

Now I just would like to check whether my impression is correct that if $(x^1, \dots, x^n)$ is a local coordinate system and so $\frac{\partial}{\partial x^i} , i = 1, \dots n$ forms a basis for the corresponing local region in the tangent bundle then a vector $v$ in the complexified tangent space $T^C_pM$ at $p \in M$ can be written as \begin{align} v \,\otimes_\mathbb{R} \mathbb{C} &= (\sum_j v^j \frac{\partial}{\partial x^j} \! |_p) \otimes _\mathbb{R} \mathbb{C} = (\sum_j v^j \frac{\partial}{\partial x^j} \! |_p) \otimes _\mathbb{R} (a + ib) \\ &= \sum_j (av^j \frac{\partial}{\partial x^j} \! |_p \otimes 1 + bv^j \frac{\partial}{\partial x^j} \! |_p \otimes i) \\ &= (\, \sum_j av^j \frac{\partial}{\partial x^j} \! |_p ) \otimes 1 + (\, \sum_j bv^j \frac{\partial}{\partial x^j} \! |_p) \otimes i \\ &= av \otimes 1 + bv \otimes i \end{align}

Is this description correct ? I am very new to tensor products so I hope I could use this as a way to check whether I actually understandt how extension of scalars work, thanks for any feedback!

share|cite|improve this question
As far as formal manipulation of variables go, it looks okay to me. – Willie Wong Jan 16 '12 at 15:04
That's great! Hopefully this means I am finally getting a little fluency in dealing with tensor products. Tks again for the help! – harlekin Jan 16 '12 at 15:29
up vote 8 down vote accepted

The result you get is correct, but the calculation indicates to me that you have not really understood how the tensor product works. Personally I would not accept this computation from an undergraduate student. For example, i could ask you, what exactly the term $v\otimes\mathbb{C}$ means, i.e. in which set lives it?

Depending on your concrete definition of the tensor product, you will sooner or later proof the following fundamental fact: If $V,W$ are vector spaces over $k$ with $k$-bases $\{v_i\}_{i\in I}$ and $\{w_j\}_{j\in J}$, then $\{v_i\otimes w_j\}_{(i,j)\in I\times J}$ is a $k$-basis of $V\otimes_k W$. In your concrete example you have $V=T_pM$ with the basis $$\left.\frac{\partial}{\partial x^1}\right|_p,\dots\left.\frac{\partial}{\partial x^n}\right|_p$$ and $W=\mathbb{C}$ with the basis (over $\mathbb{R}$) $1,i$. Then by the above considerations you know that a generic element $v\in T_p^CM=(T_pM)\otimes_\mathbb{R}\mathbb{C}$ is of the form $$v=\sum_i a_i\left.\frac{\partial}{\partial x^i}\right|_p\otimes 1\quad+\quad\sum_j b_j \left.\frac{\partial}{\partial x^j}\right|_p\otimes i$$ where $a_i,b_j\in\mathbb{R}$. Of course, this is a pain if you have to do concrete calculations, so one often lights the notation by writing $i\cdot v$ for $v\otimes i\in V\otimes\mathbb{C}$ so that a generic element in $V\otimes\mathbb{C}$ has the form $v+i\cdot w$, with $v,w\in V$. This is also the way one should think (in my opinion) about the complexification of a real vector space $V$: you have the elements $v$ of $V$ carrying complex coefficients, such that the product $\mathbb{C}\times V\ni (z,v)\mapsto z\cdot v\in V_\mathbb{C}$ is $\mathbb{R}$-bilinear. In this sense, for example a complex vector field $X\in\Gamma(T^CM)$ can b written locally as $$X=\sum_i X^i\frac{\partial}{\partial x^i}$$ with complex component functions $X^i\in C(U,\mathbb{C})$. Cheers, Robert

share|cite|improve this answer

Your Answer


By posting your answer, you agree to the privacy policy and terms of service.

Not the answer you're looking for? Browse other questions tagged or ask your own question.