Mathematics Stack Exchange is a question and answer site for people studying math at any level and professionals in related fields. Join them; it only takes a minute:

Sign up
Here's how it works:
  1. Anybody can ask a question
  2. Anybody can answer
  3. The best answers are voted up and rise to the top

I suppose this one teeters on the edge of un-mathematical, but here it goes...

I've been on something of a logic binge lately and have (surprise, surprise!) especially been interested in the results of Godel's Incompleteness Theorems. I understand that the vast, vast majority of mathematicians and logicians understand the result to imply the incompleteness of mathematics rather than its inconsistency, but I find it fun to play devil's advocate with these sorts of things. I'm interested in exploring the inconsistency side of the dichotomy.

Is there any good literature available (mathematical, logical, or just generally philosophical) which explores the nature of paradox itself rather than specific paradoxes? I know that there's some research in paraconsistent logic with true dialetheia. Is this worth exploring?

share|cite|improve this question
up vote 3 down vote accepted

Roy Sorensen does.

Edit: +1 for the question. The book cited further provides Quine's The Ways of paradox and other essays (Google docs).

share|cite|improve this answer

Given the philosophy tag, here are a couple of philosophy books on paradoxes in general.

share|cite|improve this answer

Your Answer


By posting your answer, you agree to the privacy policy and terms of service.

Not the answer you're looking for? Browse other questions tagged or ask your own question.