Mathematics Stack Exchange is a question and answer site for people studying math at any level and professionals in related fields. It's 100% free, no registration required.

Sign up
Here's how it works:
  1. Anybody can ask a question
  2. Anybody can answer
  3. The best answers are voted up and rise to the top

I have the following question concerning excision: consider the torus $T^{2}$ and a disk $D^{2}$ in the torus. Is it possible to say, by excision, that $H_{*}(T^{2}, D^{2}) = H_{*}(T^{2} - D^{2})$? If yes, why? Because I don't see it since $\bar{D^{2}}$ is not contained in $int(D^{2})$. How can I apply excision to calculate $H_{*}(T^{2} - D^{2})$ ?


share|cite|improve this question
how can I apply excision here to calculate for example $H_{*}(T^{2} - D^{2})$ ? – beno Jan 15 '12 at 7:56
Remove a slightly smaller subset $S\subset D^2$, so that the hypothesis of the excision theorem hold and such that the inclusion $T^2-D^2\to T^2-S$ is an deformation retract. – Mariano Suárez-Alvarez Jan 15 '12 at 8:49
what is $R^{2}$? – beno Jan 15 '12 at 8:56
i just got $ H_{n}(T^{2}, D^{2}) = H_{n}(T^{2} - S, D^{2} - S) $, for all $n$. How to go on further? – beno Jan 15 '12 at 9:03
can i do like this: since $(T^{2}-D^{2}, \emptyset) \rightarrow (T^{2}-S, D^{2}-S)$ is a deformation retract, then $H_{n}(T^{2}-S, D^{2}-S) = H_{n}(T^{2}-D^{2})$ ?? – beno Jan 15 '12 at 9:17

First of all, $H_*(T^2,D^2)$ is not isomorphic to $H^*(T^2\setminus D^2)$. By the long exact sequence of the pair $H_*(T^2,D^2)$ it is possible to show that $H_*(T^2,D^2)\cong \tilde{H}_*(T^2)$, where this last notation denotes reduced homology. On the other hand $T^2\setminus D^2$ is homotopy equivalent to the one-point union of two circles. In particular $H_2(T^2\setminus D^2)=0$, but $H_2(T^2,D^2)=\mathbb Z$.

Excision can tell you that $H_*(T^2,D^2)\cong H_*(T^2\setminus int(D^2),\partial D^2)$. This is because we are excising $int(D^2)$. (Recall excision give an isomorphism $H_*(X,Y)\cong H_*(X\setminus U,Y\setminus U)$. Actually, to apply excision, the closure of $U$ needs to be contained in the interior of $Y$, so you need to fuss a little with deformation retracts first.)

(Also, perhaps you meant $H_*(T^2,D^2)\cong \tilde{H}_*(T^2/D^2)$, where $T^2/D^2$ is the quotient space? This is true.)

share|cite|improve this answer
how did you use excision when you showed $H_{n}(T^{2}, D^{2}) = H_{n}(T^{2} - D^{2}, \partial D^{2})$, for all $n$ ?? – beno Jan 17 '12 at 6:55
Oops, looks like I missed an 'interior' sign. I'll fix that. In any event, excision lets you cut out the interior of $D^2$ from $T^2$ and $D^2$, leaving behind $T^2\setminus int(D^2)$ and $\partial D^2$. – Grumpy Parsnip Jan 17 '12 at 13:56
@beno He excised a disk a bit smaller that the $D^2$, inside the said $D^2$. Remember that excision does NOT provide a way to compute $H_n(H-B)$; it only tells that in the homology of a pair $(X,A)$, what happens inside $A$ doesn't matter, as long as it's "a bit far" from the border between $A$ and $X-A$. – Samuel T Apr 18 '12 at 9:42

Your Answer


By posting your answer, you agree to the privacy policy and terms of service.

Not the answer you're looking for? Browse other questions tagged or ask your own question.