Mathematics Stack Exchange is a question and answer site for people studying math at any level and professionals in related fields. Join them; it only takes a minute:

Sign up
Here's how it works:
  1. Anybody can ask a question
  2. Anybody can answer
  3. The best answers are voted up and rise to the top

Simply, if there is a polynomial $f$, in noncommuting variables, which vanishes under substitutions from ring $R$, the ring will be called a PI ring (Polynomial Identity ring). For example, commutative rings always satisfy the polynomial $f(x,y) = xy - yx$.

Is $M_{2}(K)$, the ring of all $2 \times2$ matrices over a field $K$, a PI ring? I have tried to construct a polynomial, assuming that this ring is a PI ring, but couldn't find any. Thanks.

share|cite|improve this question
up vote 4 down vote accepted

See the Amitsur-Levitzki theorem.

Any four $2\times 2$ matrices $A_1,A_2,A_3,A_4$ satisfy $$\sum_{\sigma\in S_4} \mathrm{sgn}(\sigma)A_{\sigma(1)}A_{\sigma(2)}A_{\sigma(3)}A_{\sigma(4)}=0.$$ Hence $M_2(K)$ satisfies the polynomial identity $$\sum_{\sigma\in S_4} \mathrm{sgn}(\sigma) x_{\sigma(1)}x_{\sigma(2)}x_{\sigma(3)}x_{\sigma(4)}$$ of degree $4$ in four variables. This generalizes to $M_{n}(K)$.

share|cite|improve this answer
@ArturoMagidin: Is there any restrictions on the degree of this polynomial? I mean, when you gave above polynomial of degree 4, so I shouldn't expect to find any of degree 3. – Basil R Jan 15 '12 at 8:23
@Arturo, I got my last question's answer. It will satisfy a polynomial of degree exactly 4. Thanks. – Basil R Jan 15 '12 at 8:28

Besides to first pervasive answer, suppose $A$ and $B$ be such two matrices. The Cayley–Hamilton theorem implies that if $x$= $(AB-BA)$ then $(AB-BA)^2$ commutes with any other $2\times 2$ matrix in $M_{2}(K)$. It leads you to $f(x,y,z)=(xy-yx)^2z-z(xy-yx)^2$.

share|cite|improve this answer

Matrix rings over a given commutative ring (in particular, over any field) are indeed PI, and in some sense are the motivating prototypes.

Since you say this is homework, I am reluctant to give an explicit reference for this fact, at least until you give some more context. Were you given any hints in the course? Is this an optional question for interest, or are you expected to work out the answer using things mentioned in class?

share|cite|improve this answer
Thanks for hints. I expected to examine and find this ploynomial for the given statement in the class. – Basil R Jan 15 '12 at 8:15

Your Answer


By posting your answer, you agree to the privacy policy and terms of service.

Not the answer you're looking for? Browse other questions tagged or ask your own question.