Mathematics Stack Exchange is a question and answer site for people studying math at any level and professionals in related fields. Join them; it only takes a minute:

Sign up
Here's how it works:
  1. Anybody can ask a question
  2. Anybody can answer
  3. The best answers are voted up and rise to the top

Could someone tell me how to compute the cohomology algebra $H^*(K, \mathbb{Z}_2)$ of the three dimensional Klein bottle $K$ defined as follows. Let $S_0,S_1$ be the boundaries of $S^2 \times [0,1]$ with induced orientations from $S^2 \times [0,1]$. Let $h: S_0 \to S_1$ be an orientation reversing homeomorphism. Define $K$ to be the quotient of $S^2 \times [0,1]$ by identifying $S_0$ and $S_1$ via $f$.

share|cite|improve this question
Don't you want an orientation reversing homeo? – Mariano Suárez-Alvarez Jan 14 '12 at 7:27
Many thanks for correction and your detailed answer. – kelly Jan 14 '12 at 8:01
up vote 3 down vote accepted

$\newcommand\ZZ{\mathbb{Z}}$Look at $S^1$ as $I=[0,1]$ with the endpoints identified. There is an obvious map $\pi:K\to S^1$ which is induced by the second projection $S^2\times I\to I$. Let $0$, $\infty$ be two distinct points in $S^1$ and let $\tilde U=S^1\setminus\{0\}$ and $\tilde V=S^1\setminus\{\infty\}$. Then $\{\tilde U,\tilde V\}$ is an open covering of $S^1$, so defining $U=\pi^{-1}(\tilde U)$ and $V=\pi^{-1}(\tilde V)$, we get an open covering $\{U,V\}$ of $K$.

It is easy to see that $U$ and $V$ have both the homotopy type of a $2$-sphere, and $U\cap V$ has two conected components, each of the homotopy type of a $2$-sphere again. The Mayer-Vietoris exact sequence for $(K;U,V)$ starts with $$ 0\to H^0(K) \to H^0(U)\oplus H^0(V) \to H^0(U\cap V) \to H^1(K) \to H^1(U)\oplus H^1(V) \qquad(\clubsuit) $$ Since $U$ and $V$ "are" $2$-spheres, the rightmost group here is zero. Since $H^0(K)=H^0(U)=H^0(V)=\ZZ_2$ and $H^0(U\cap V)\cong\ZZ_2^2$, and since this is an exact sequence of $\ZZ_2$-vector spaces, we see that $H^1(K)\cong\ZZ_2$.

Likewise, after $H^1(U)\oplus H^1(V)=0$ the M-V sequence is $$ H^1(U\cap V) \to H^2(K) \to H^2(U)\oplus H^2(V) \to H^2(U\cap V) \to H^3(K) \to H^3(U)\oplus H^3(V) $$ Since $U\cap V$ "is" a union of two $2$-spheres, $H^1(U\cap V)=0$; since $U$ and $V$ are $2$-spheres, $H^3(U)\oplus H^3(V)=0$ and $H^2(U)\cong H^2(V)\cong\ZZ_2$; since $U\cap V$ "is" two disjoint $2$-spheres, $H^2(U\cap V)\cong\ZZ_2^2$; finally, since $K$ is a compact manifold, $H^3(K)\cong\ZZ_2$. Replacing all this information in the exact sequence and counting dimensions of vector spaces, we see that $H^2(K)\cong\ZZ_2$.

Remark. One can try to do the same computation with coefficients in $\ZZ$. To get $H^1(K,\ZZ)$ one has to make explicit the map $H^0(U)\oplus H^0(V) \to H^0(U\cap V)$: with a more or less obvious choice of bases for these two free groups of rank $2$ the matrix of the map is $\begin{pmatrix}1&1\\1&1\end{pmatrix}$, and it follows from this and the exact sequence that $H^1(K,\ZZ)\cong\ZZ$. On the other hand, the map $H^2(U)\oplus H^2(V) \to H^2(U\cap V)$ has, in a similar basis, matrix $\begin{pmatrix}1&1\\1&-1\end{pmatrix}$, which is injective, so that $H^2(K,\ZZ)=0$ and has determinant with absolute value $2$, so that its cokernel is cyclic of order $2$, that is, $H^3(K,\ZZ)\cong\ZZ_2$. Here it is wee see fact that the homeo reverses the orientation: if it preserved it, the last matrix would have been $\begin{pmatrix}1&1\\1&1\end{pmatrix}$ which has both kernel and cokernel free of rank $1$.

The exact sequence $(\clubsuit)$ depends covariantly on the coefficients. From the surjection $\ZZ\to\ZZ_2$ we can construct a diagram from it to show that the natural map $H^1(K,\ZZ)\to H^1(K,\ZZ_2)$ is surjective. Since the cup product $H^1(K,\ZZ)\otimes H^1(K,\ZZ)\to H^2(K,\ZZ)=0$ is of course trivial, and since the cup product is natural with respect to ring homomorphisms in the coefficients, this implies that the cup product $H^1(K,\ZZ_2)\otimes H^1(K,\ZZ_2)\to H^2(K,\ZZ_2)$ is also zero.


Alternatively, there is a cell decomposition with one cell of each dimension in $\{0,1,2,3\}$ in which, moreover, the $2$-cell is attached with its boundary contracted to the $0$-cell. The cellular complex to compute cohomology is then easily seen to have all coboundary maps equal to zero. Of course, this gives the same result as above.

share|cite|improve this answer
Many thanks for your detailed answer. – kelly Jan 14 '12 at 8:06
Notice that I did not compute the product... – Mariano Suárez-Alvarez Jan 14 '12 at 8:09
Thanks again. I hope I would be able to make out the product. – kelly Jan 14 '12 at 8:36
So this gives $H^*(K, \mathbb{Z}_2) \cong \mathbb{Z}_2[a,b]/<a^2,b^2>$ with $deg(a)=1$ and $deg(b)=2$. – kelly Jan 14 '12 at 9:29
The product $H^1\otimes H^2\to H^3$ is missing. – Mariano Suárez-Alvarez Jan 14 '12 at 10:11

Your Answer


By posting your answer, you agree to the privacy policy and terms of service.

Not the answer you're looking for? Browse other questions tagged or ask your own question.