Take the 2-minute tour ×
Mathematics Stack Exchange is a question and answer site for people studying math at any level and professionals in related fields. It's 100% free, no registration required.

Does anyone know how to easily compute them? We know that a number is a square modulo $2^k$ if and only if it's a square modulo $8$. This gives a bunch of integers that represent square classes. I also know that

$$\mathbb{Q}_2^\times \cong \mathbb{Z}\times (1+2\mathbb{Z}_2),$$

but I can't figure out how to find the square classes in $1+2\mathbb{Z}_2$. Is there some really simple solution for this? I can't seem to figure out how to apply Hensel's lemma here.

share|improve this question
    
Maybe my little knowledge is a dangerous thing, but why isn't the answer simply everything of the form $2^k (1 + 8z)$, where $k \in \mathbb Z$ and $z \in {\mathbb Z}_2$? –  Greg Martin Jan 11 '12 at 19:28
1  
@GregMartin: $k$ has to be even. –  Cam McLeman Jan 11 '12 at 19:34
1  
@CamMcLeman: sorry yes of course –  Greg Martin Jan 11 '12 at 23:58

1 Answer 1

up vote 4 down vote accepted

By your observations, a square element of $1+2\mathbb{Z}_2$ must actually live in $1+8\mathbb{Z}_2$. So $$ \mathbb{Q}_2^\times/\mathbb{Q}_2^{\times 2}\approx \mathbb{Z}/2\mathbb{Z}\times \frac{1+2\mathbb{Z}_2}{1+8\mathbb{Z}_2}\approx \mathbb{Z}/2\mathbb{Z}\times \mathbb{Z}/2\mathbb{Z}\times \mathbb{Z}/2\mathbb{Z}. $$ The first factor of $\mathbb{Z}/2\mathbb{Z}$ corresponds to choosing even/odd-ness of the power of 2 dividing the element of $\mathbb{Q}_2^\times$, the latter two any choice of coset represenatives for odd squares mod 8. So one possible enumeration of representatives for these 8 classes are the classes of $$ \{\pm 1,\pm 2,\pm 5,\pm 10\}. $$

share|improve this answer
    
Cam, that is the choice on page 43 of Cassels, Rational Quadratic Forms. There was some poor slob a few months ago here on MSE who wanted to know the primes for which some indefinite ternary, diagonal such as $3 x^2 + 7 y^2 - 15 z^2,$ was isotropic. I typed it all in but I do not believe it took. Oh, also he wouldn't buy Cassels, he "had no access" to it. math.stackexchange.com/questions/89138/… –  Will Jagy Jan 11 '12 at 20:20
    
@WillJagy: Indeed, I'm at the moment the unique upvote on that answer. :) And it appears that this particular class of representatives is a heavy favorite -- I quickly checked, and both Gouvea and Serre use it as well! –  Cam McLeman Jan 11 '12 at 23:14
1  
Thanks, Cam, I do like to educate the OP, but that takes time, and often they want just enough to do the homework, but quickly. I see, both answers there were mine, after the OP said the first answer wasn't good enough. Sigh. –  Will Jagy Jan 11 '12 at 23:51

Your Answer

 
discard

By posting your answer, you agree to the privacy policy and terms of service.

Not the answer you're looking for? Browse other questions tagged or ask your own question.