Mathematics Stack Exchange is a question and answer site for people studying math at any level and professionals in related fields. It's 100% free, no registration required.

Sign up
Here's how it works:
  1. Anybody can ask a question
  2. Anybody can answer
  3. The best answers are voted up and rise to the top

I found this in a Computer Science pseudocode context (see page 4 of this paper).

Double inequality image

share|cite|improve this question
up vote 12 down vote accepted

It means exactly the same as $\le$.

share|cite|improve this answer
Is there any particular reason for using this sign instead of $\le$ ? – 8128 Jan 11 '12 at 11:34
It might just be the author's preference, or the journal's convention, or just because it's an old paper and there were typographical restrictions. If you start reading even older stuff with maths in it, you'll be surprised what kooky notation and language they use (at least, it's considered kooky now). – Clive Newstead Jan 11 '12 at 11:40
@Doug: It's likely that the latter evolved from the former; the meaning of $\leqq$ and $\le$ is the same, but convention has it that $\le$ is now the most commonly used. This is probably because there's no distinction that really needs to be made. This is in contrast to, say, $\simeq$ and $\cong$ in topology, which do mean different things (respectively, homotopy equivalence and homeomorphism). – Clive Newstead Jan 11 '12 at 12:02
${\lower 1pt\lt}\atop\raise 1pt =$ apparently came first. . I could not find any information on when the modern symbol "$\le$" was first used. – David Mitra Jan 11 '12 at 12:16
In short, $\leqq=\leq$. – Tsuyoshi Ito Jan 11 '12 at 12:44

It is the same old $\le$ symbol.

Mathematical notation is far from set in stone or standardised, as might appear to a beginner. Here's a sample of the variations in the inequality signs (taken from symbols-a4.pdf):

a sample of inequality signs a sample-continued

Of course, most of this is not commonly used; my guess is that they have been included only for historical purposes and for completeness.

share|cite|improve this answer

In the given context, it means “less than or equal to,” just as “≤” means. However, it is coded as a separate character (not just a glyph variant), so it could be used for some other meaning. A symbol means whatever people make it mean.

Historically, it is a glyph variant, and it has been encoded as a character primarily for compatibility reasons, see Unicode Standard, pages 491–492.

According to the ISO 80000-2 standard, the character to be used is “≤” (U+2264).

share|cite|improve this answer

Your Answer


By posting your answer, you agree to the privacy policy and terms of service.

Not the answer you're looking for? Browse other questions tagged or ask your own question.