Sign up ×
Mathematics Stack Exchange is a question and answer site for people studying math at any level and professionals in related fields. It's 100% free, no registration required.

Recently, I came across the following statements. They were annotated as consequences of Fubini's Theorem but neither proof nor reference were given.

  1. Let $f:[a,b]\times [a,b]\to\mathbb{R}$ be Lebesgue integrable. Then it holds: $$ \int_a^b\int_a^y f(x,y)\,\mathrm{d}x\,\mathrm{d}y =\int_a^b\int_x^b f(x,y)\,\mathrm{d}y\,\mathrm{d}x\text{.} $$
  2. Let $f:[a,b]\to\mathbb{R}$ be Lebesgue integrable and $x\in[a,b]$. Then it holds: $$ \int_a^x\int_a^{x_1}\cdots\int_a^{x_{n-1}} f(x_n)\,\mathrm{d}x_n\cdots\,\mathrm{d}x_2\,\mathrm{d}x_1 =\int_a^x \frac{(x-t)^{n-1}}{(n-1)!}f(t)\,\mathrm{d}t\text{.} $$


  1. Let $$g:[a,b]\times [a,b]\ni(x,y) \mapsto\left\{\begin{array}{ll} 1 & \text{, }x\le y \\ 0 & \text{, otherwise}\end{array}\right\}\in\mathbb{R}\text{.} $$ Then $g$ is measurable since $g^{-1}(S)$ is open or closed for all $S\subseteq\mathbb{R}$. Since $g$ is non-negative, it is clearly Lebesgue integrable. Consequently, $h:=f g$ is Lebesgue integrable. By Fubini's Theorem it follows that $$ \int_{[a,b]\times [a,b]} h(x,y)\,\mathrm{d}(x,y) =\int_a^b\int_a^b h(x,y)\,\mathrm{d}x\,\mathrm{d}y =\int_a^b\int_a^b h(x,y)\,\mathrm{d}y\,\mathrm{d}x\text{.} $$ Finally, $$ \int_a^b\int_a^b h(x,y)\,\mathrm{d}x\,\mathrm{d}y =\int_a^b\int_a^b f(x,y) g(x,y)\,\mathrm{d}x\,\mathrm{d}y =\int_a^b\int_a^y f(x,y)\,\mathrm{d}x\,\mathrm{d}y $$ and $$ \int_a^b\int_a^b h(x,y)\,\mathrm{d}y\,\mathrm{d}x =\int_a^b\int_a^b f(x,y) g(x,y)\,\mathrm{d}y\,\mathrm{d}x =\int_a^b\int_x^b f(x,y)\,\mathrm{d}y\,\mathrm{d}x $$ conclude the proof.
  2. We proceed by induction with respect to $n$. For $n=1$ the statement is trivial. Assuming its correctness for $n=m-1\in\mathbb{N}$, we prove the statement for $n=m$. Application of the induction hypothesis yields $$ \int_a^x\int_a^{x_1}\cdots\int_a^{x_{m-1}} f(x_m)\,\mathrm{d}x_m\cdots\,\mathrm{d}x_2\,\mathrm{d}x_1 =\int_a^x\int_a^{x_1} \frac{(x_1-t)^{m-2}}{(m-2)!}f(t)\,\mathrm{d}t\,\mathrm{d}x_1\text{.} $$ We show that $$ g:[a,x]\times [a,x]\ni(t,u) \mapsto\frac{(u-t)^{m-2}}{(m-2)!}f(t)\in\mathbb{R} $$ is Lebesgue integrable. First of all, $(t,u)\mapsto\frac{(u-t)^{m-2}}{(m-2)!}$ is Lebesgue integrable since it is continuous. Moreover, $(t,u)\mapsto f(t)$ is Lebesgue integrable as tensor product of Lebesgue integrable functions. Eventually, $g$ is Lebesgue integrable as product of Lebesgue integrable functions. Finally, 1. yields $$ \begin{align} \int_a^x\int_a^{x_1}\cdots\int_a^{x_{m-1}} f(x_m)\,\mathrm{d}x_m\cdots\,\mathrm{d}x_2\,\mathrm{d}x_1 & =\int_a^x\int_t^x \frac{(x_1-t)^{m-2}}{(m-2)!}f(t)\,\mathrm{d}x_1\,\mathrm{d}t\\ & =\int_a^x\int_t^x \frac{(x_1-t)^{m-2}}{(m-2)!}\,\mathrm{d}x_1\,f(t)\,\mathrm{d}t\\ & =\int_a^x\frac{(x-t)^{m-1}}{(m-1)!}\,f(t)\,\mathrm{d}t. \end{align} $$

My questions:

  • Is the proof correct and complete?
  • Are the arguments unnecessarily complicated? Can the proof be simplified?
  • How would you prove the statements?
  • Do you know a reference of the statements in a textbook or scientific article?

Edit: Corrections included.

share|cite|improve this question
The first proof is ok. – AD. Jan 7 '12 at 15:03
In the second statement you might have missed $dx$? Otherwise, it does not have much to do with part 1. as I see it...? BTW the verb is "we prove" not "we proof" - proof is a subject (a thing). – AD. Jan 7 '12 at 15:06
If you want every necessary statement and step actually addressed, the proofs don't seem long; and it's probably the most natural way of showing this using fubini. – gnometorule Jan 7 '12 at 15:22
Thank you for your answers. Indeed, in the second statement the integrand has to be $f(x_n)$ and not $f(x)$ as I had mistakenly written before. Comments to my embarrassing English are appreciated, too. The original question is updated. – precarious Jan 7 '12 at 15:35

Your Answer


By posting your answer, you agree to the privacy policy and terms of service.

Browse other questions tagged or ask your own question.