# Inverse Equation Largest Possible Set [closed]

I have a question I'm not sure how to work out (because I don't really understand it). Please help me; I have spent a lot of time on this question and tried to work backwards from the answer but didn't succeed.

Also please excuse the picture - I'm not sure how to write equations in the markup apart from basic algebra and fractions.

Please explain how I can work this out step-by-step, and thank you for your help!

-

## closed as unclear what you're asking by Normal Human, Batominovski, graydad, Solid Snake, Carl MummertAug 18 at 2:00

Please clarify your specific problem or add additional details to highlight exactly what you need. As it's currently written, it’s hard to tell exactly what you're asking. See the How to Ask page for help clarifying this question. If this question can be reworded to fit the rules in the help center, please edit the question.

The function $f$ has an inverse on $S$ if, given $f(x)$, where $x$ is in $S$, we can uniquely recover the value of $x$. To put it another way, if there are two distinct numbers $s$ and $t$ in $S$ such that $f(s)=f(t)$, then $f$ does not have an inverse $f^{-1}$ defined on the set $S$.

By completing the square, we see that $f(x)=(x-5)^2-7$. So any set $S$ that contains two different numbers $s$, $t$ symmetrical about $5$ is bad. For then $f(s)=f(t)$, which means we cannot always uniquely recover $x$ given the value of $f(x)$.

That observation rules out answer B, since $[0,\infty)$ contains for example the two numbers $4.5$ and $5.5$ symmetrical about $5$. Unfortunately, B is the only answer that is thus ruled out.

We have to rule out three other answers by using the undefined notion of "largest" possible set. Maybe we can agree (???) that if $U \subset V$ and $U\ne V$, ( that is, if $U$ is a proper subset of $V$) then $V$ is larger than $U$. Then answer A gets ruled out, because $(-\infty,0]$ is a proper subset of $(-\infty,5]$.

Answers C and D can be more plausibly ruled out because each of $[0,5]$ and $[5,100]$ is an interval of finite length, while our leader so far, $(-\infty,5]$, is an interval of infinite length, and thus arguably larger. So the only surviving answer is E.

Comment: The question is in my view unfortunate, since the critical fact you need to know is that if $f(s)=f(t)$ for two distinct numbers $s$, $t$, in $S$, then $f^{-1}$ cannot exist on $S$. Conversely, if one cannot find distinct $s$, $t$ in $S$ such that $f(s)=f(t)$, then an inverse function $f^{-1}$ does exist on $S$.

So B is easy to rule out. Ruling out others rests on giving interpretations to "largest." It turns out that for infinite sets, there are various criteria of largeness. For example, under most standard mathematical definitions of largeness, the sets $(-\infty,0]$ and $(-\infty,5]$ are of the same size.

-

What we want is the largest set $S$ such that $f(x)\neq f(y)$ for any two distinct $x,y\in S$. In other words, the largest set $S$ such that $f$ is strictly increasing or strictly decreasing on $S$. So where is it strictly increasing or strictly decreasing? Well, since it is a quadratic equation with positive coefficient on the $x^2$ term, we know that it will be strictly decreasing from $-\infty$ until and including when it reaches its minimum, and then strictly increasing from that point afterwards. The minimum occurs when $x$ satisfies $f'(x) = 0$ (this is from calculus, if it is unfamiliar to you ignore it), that is when $2x-10=0$ (this should come from some formula you've learned if you are not familiar with calculus). So the minimum occurs when $x=5$. This means the two largest possible sets for $f^{-1}$ to exist are $(-\infty,5]$ and $[5,\infty)$. At this point the question is incorrect, as both these sets are exactly the same size (in technical terms, they have the same measure). However, only one of these is one of your choices, so the answer is E.

-