Take the 2-minute tour ×
Mathematics Stack Exchange is a question and answer site for people studying math at any level and professionals in related fields. It's 100% free, no registration required.

I want to learn about manifolds, but I'm only a senior in high school and obviously have a while to go. I'm in AP Calc BC. What should I study to eventually learn manifolds? Linear Algebra? What else?

share|improve this question
2  
Multivariable calculus and general topology. –  rafaelm Jan 5 '12 at 1:21
5  
You need to learn linear algebra independently of what ulterior interest you might have, really. –  Mariano Suárez-Alvarez Jan 5 '12 at 2:41
3  
I agree with Mariano's answer. In fact, manifolds are quite far away from freshman calculus -- at least two solid years of study away, in my opinion -- and in between lies a bunch of things you will have to take anyway, especially multi-variable calculus, linear algebra and basic real analysis. Really I think it's too soon to be worrying about this, and I don't mean this in the discouraging sense, I literally mean that you needn't worry about it yet... –  Pete L. Clark Jan 5 '12 at 3:39
3  
...If you want advice, here it is: first, enroll in a university (or very good liberal arts college -- i.e., in the Amherst-Swarthmore-Williams class) with a very strong math department. Second, concentrate now on fully mastering the material up to and including BC calculus. Really having this down will serve you well, even unto your study of manifolds. Good luck! –  Pete L. Clark Jan 5 '12 at 3:40
4  
@PeteL.Clark, what's «BC Calculus»? Before Cauchy :) –  Mariano Suárez-Alvarez Jan 5 '12 at 4:28

6 Answers 6

I hate to add yet another answer to the list, but I would like to be thorough. The pre-requisites for learning about manifolds are as follows:

  • Multivariable calculus
  • Linear algebra
  • Real analysis
  • Point-set topology (a.k.a. General topology)

For multivariable calculus and linear algebra, most of the standard texts will do. Note that multivariable calculus and linear algebra can be learned independently of one another (so it doesn't matter which one you learn first).

There are many good texts for learning real analysis, some of which are mentioned in the answers to this question. It will be important that your real analysis education cover not only single-variable differentiation and integration, but also multivariable differentiation and integration as well. In particular, it's important that you learn about the Inverse Function Theorem and Implicit Function Theorem.

Where point-set topology is concerned, some of it will hopefully be covered when you learn real analysis. (Indeed, many analysis texts consider point-set topology to be a part of analysis.) You will need to learn about metric spaces and topological spaces. An excellent book for this is "Topology" (Munkres).

Finally, once you've gotten through all of this, I would say the text to use for manifold theory is "Introduction to Smooth Manifolds" (John Lee). In fact, the book has an appendix at the end which gives a rapid treatment of each of these four subjects. So, if you absolutely cannot contain your curiosity, this might be worth looking into.

Optional: One more helpful (but not necessary) pre-requisite is elementary differential geometry (or classical differential geometry), which is a beautiful topic to learn once you've finished with multivariable calculus. My recommended textbook is "Elementary Differential Geometry" (Pressley).

share|improve this answer
    
Is there a way to streamline this? Certainly each of these areas merits its own attention, and there are lovely little nooks, crannies and whole villages to explore, see and appreciate, but if I just want to start to Lee's book quickly what would I need? –  Erik G. Jan 19 '13 at 1:31
    
@ErikG: If you don't know any multivariable calculus or linear algebra, I'd say it'd be pretty difficult to get started on Lee's "Intro to Smooth Manifolds" book. But like I said, if you're in a rush, take a look at the appendix to Lee's book: it covers (in a rapid but useful fashion) all of the pre-requisite knowledge. –  Jesse Madnick Jan 19 '13 at 1:39
    
Lee also wrote a prequel called "Introduction to Topological Manifolds" for the topology background. The pre-requisites to that book are fairly light, so maybe that's the way to go. Ultimately, it's similar to Munkres' "Topology" book, but with an emphasis on topological manifolds. (The multivariable calculus and real analysis mainly comes into play when studying smooth manifolds. Note that smooth manifolds have found many more applications in mathematics, so the term "manifold" generally refers to smooth ones.) –  Jesse Madnick Jan 19 '13 at 1:43
    
Very useful to know thanks. My sense is that there is all the difference between studying math you like, even if it is advanced; and, going about it in the typical curricular fashion of first take these courses first. –  Erik G. Jan 19 '13 at 2:06

You should most likely have a background in linear algebra as you said, multivariable calculus, and real and complex analysis. For instance, Rudin begins a discussion of manifolds after discussing standard multivariable analysis in his Principles of Mathematical Analysis.

share|improve this answer
    
I like this answer, but don't think complex analysis is really necessary. –  Jesse Madnick Jan 5 '12 at 3:09
3  
Speaking from experience, I also don't think Rudin's discussion of manifolds is particularly friendly to beginners. –  Jesse Madnick Jan 5 '12 at 3:28
    
Well, if you want to study complex manifolds, then complex analysis certainly seems to be in order. Anyway, complex analysis sure can't hurt (I am struggling to think of what could...). And I agree, the material on manifolds in Rudin's Principles is about as bad as the preceding part of the book is good. Just about anywhere else would be better. –  Pete L. Clark Jan 5 '12 at 3:45
    
@Pete I completely agree,it may be the single worst presentation of multivariable calculus in the history of textbooks.I personally have always thought the last 2 chapters of Rudin are forced and tacked on. –  Mathemagician1234 Jan 5 '12 at 11:05

I agree with @analysisj 's response (and up-voted it). I just wanted to add that it might be useful to review some topology depending on how your real and complex analysis courses were taught. Some analysis courses use books that are light on the point set topology theory.

share|improve this answer

I think the prerequisites you will need to study manifold theory depend on which aspect of manifold theory that you wish to study. For example, a good knowledge of algebraic topology is more essential if you wish to study differential topology than if you wish to study differential geometry (although you should eventually learn algebraic topology in some depth no matter which aspect of manifold theory you pursue). However, the prerequisites to study the standard theory of differentiable manifolds are (generally speaking) point-set topology, linear algebra and advanced (multivariable) calculus. A good knowledge of point-set topology and linear algebra implies that you have the mathematical maturity necessary to study manifold theory as well as the necessary knowledge; thus, it is important to carefully study these two subjects.

For example, you might wish to look at Topology: A First Course by James Munkres and Linear Algebra Done Right by Sheldon Axler which will provide you with more knowledge in these subjects than is strictly necessary in manifold theory (but this knowledge will be essential in your study of other branches of mathematics). Finally, I think Principles of Mathematical Analysis by Walter Rudin furnishes a solid knowledge of the elements of advanced calculus (both single-variable and multivariable) that will be necessary for manifold theory.

In short, it would be a good idea to use manifold theory as a means to advance your knowledge of other (essential) branches of mathematics because the prerequisites for manifold theory are more fundamental in mathematics (as a whole) than manifold theory itself.

I hope this helps!

share|improve this answer

In addition to linear algebra, analysis and topology as others have suggested, learning some classical differential geometry probably wouldn't be a bad idea either. The very abstract definitions one encounters in the theory of manifolds are inspired by the principles of differential geometry much as point-set topology was inspired by analysis. Seeing these concepts made tangible by concrete calculations will give more meaning to the more elaborate machinery of manifolds and differential forms.

share|improve this answer

Here's a nice basic introduction -- it gives an idea of what manifolds are, and you don't need to know linear algebra or multivariable calculus to read it: http://www.math.washington.edu/~lee/Books/ITM/c01.pdf

A good resource for people who haven't even had calculus but who want to learn some basic ideas in topology is http://www.learner.org/courses/mathilluminated/units/4/textbook/01.php

Before you can even learn the precise definition of manifolds and theorems about manifolds you should be familiar with topological notions that students typically learn in analysis. It's difficult to have any intuition behind manifolds if you don't have a good idea of $\mathbb{R}^n$. But you should take a look at Chapter 2 of Munkres's Topology. Try to understand what you can. If you get too lost, consult an introductory analysis book like Rosenlicht's Introduction to Real Analysis and hop back and forth between the two. If you want to do calculus on manifolds, you should certainly learn some linear algebra and multivariable calculus first.

share|improve this answer

Your Answer

 
discard

By posting your answer, you agree to the privacy policy and terms of service.

Not the answer you're looking for? Browse other questions tagged or ask your own question.