Take the 2-minute tour ×
Mathematics Stack Exchange is a question and answer site for people studying math at any level and professionals in related fields. It's 100% free, no registration required.

It is known from the theory of continued fractions that if $\epsilon<1/2$ then the only $a,b\in\mathbb{Z}$ such that $$(a,b)=1\quad\text{and}\quad\left|\frac{a}{b}-x\right|<\frac{\epsilon}{b^2}$$ are the convergents of the simple continued fraction of $x$. Hence not all $x$ are in the set measured. I am interested how many irrational number can be approximated by rational numbers arbitrarily, in a certain sense. That's why I am interested in the following expression, in which $m$ denotes the Lebesgue's measure. $$\lim \limits_{\epsilon \to0^+} m(\{x\in [0,1]:\exists\;\text{infinitely many}\;a,b \in \mathbb{Z},\text{ s.t.}~(a,b)=1\quad\text{and}\quad\left|\frac{a}{b}-x\right|<\frac{\epsilon}{b^2}\})$$

share|improve this question

1 Answer 1

The expression inside the limit is equal to $1$ for every $\epsilon > 0$. In fact a much more precise statement is true.

Theorem (Khinchin): Let $\phi(q) : \mathbb{N} \to \mathbb{R}$ be a monotonically decreasing function. For almost all real numbers $\alpha$, the number of pairs of positive integers $(q, p)$ satisfying

$$\left| p - q\alpha \right| < \phi(q)$$

is infinite if $\sum \phi(q)$ diverges, and finite if $\sum \phi(q)$ converges.

share|improve this answer
    
Didn't you learn that on mathoverflow? I vaguely remember this theorem. –  user22190 Jan 3 '12 at 20:55

Your Answer

 
discard

By posting your answer, you agree to the privacy policy and terms of service.

Not the answer you're looking for? Browse other questions tagged or ask your own question.