Take the 2-minute tour ×
Mathematics Stack Exchange is a question and answer site for people studying math at any level and professionals in related fields. It's 100% free, no registration required.

Hopf Fibration is $F:S^3\to S^2$ given by formula $F\left(z_1,z_2\right)=\left(\left(\phi^+\right)^{-1}\left(\frac{z_1}{z_2}\right)\right)$ for $z_2 \ne0$ and $F\left(z_1,0\right)=\left(1,0,0\right)$ where $\phi^+$ is stereographic projection from $\left(1,0,0\right)$ of $S^2$.

Now to prove this I tried to compute the rank of the Jacobian matrix of $\psi\circ F\circ\phi^{-1}$ with $\psi$ being the stereographic projection from North of $S^3$. But is this the easy way?

share|improve this question

1 Answer 1

up vote 3 down vote accepted

It depends on what you consider easy to be. First of all, since $\phi^+$ is a diffeomorphism between the $2$-sphere and the Riemann sphere, you can throw it away and consider only the map $G : S^3 \to \overline{\mathbb C}$ given by $G(z_1,z_2) = z_1/z_2$. And $G$ extends to a scale-invariant map $G : \mathbb C^2 \setminus \{(0,0)\} \to \overline{ \mathbb C }$ via the same formula. So $F$ is a submersion if and only if $G$ (with domain $\mathbb C^2 \setminus {(0,0)}$) is a submersion. That this latter map is a submersion is easy-enough to check -- you'll have to use two charts on the Riemann sphere $\overline{\mathbb C}$ to see it, but that's fine. You could also eliminate that step by making some symmetry observations.

A totally different way to make the argument would be to write $S^3$ as the union of two solid tori, and define the map on those solid tori, I believe Hatcher does this in his 3-manifolds notes. This gives not only a quick-and-dirty proof but it also gives you a strong intuition for how to visualize the map.

share|improve this answer

Your Answer

 
discard

By posting your answer, you agree to the privacy policy and terms of service.

Not the answer you're looking for? Browse other questions tagged or ask your own question.