Mathematics Stack Exchange is a question and answer site for people studying math at any level and professionals in related fields. Join them; it only takes a minute:

Sign up
Here's how it works:
  1. Anybody can ask a question
  2. Anybody can answer
  3. The best answers are voted up and rise to the top

A topological space $X$ is said to be star compact if whenever $\mathscr{U}$ is an open cover of $X$, there is a compact subspace $K$ of $X$ such that $X = \operatorname{St}(K,\mathscr{U})$.

A topological space $X$ is said to be star countable if whenever $\mathscr{U}$ is an open cover of $X$, there is a countable subspace $K$ of $X$ such that $X = \operatorname{St}(K,\mathscr{U})$.

We know that there are some topological spaces which are star countable but not star compact. However I don't know whether star compact implies star countable. Is there a topological space which is star compact but not star countable?

Added: $St(K, \mathscr{U})=\cup\{u\in \mathscr{U}: u \cap K \neq \emptyset\}$

share|cite|improve this question
Could you provide a definition of $\operatorname{St}(K,\mathscr{U})$, please? – user20266 Jan 1 '12 at 9:25
$St(K, \mathscr{U})=\cup\{u\in \mathscr{U}: u \cap K \neq \emptyset\}$ – Paul Jan 1 '12 at 9:49
Such a space (if it exists) cannot be normal, because for $T_4$ spaces star compact is equivalent to star finite, so certainly star countable. – Henno Brandsma Jan 1 '12 at 10:46
It also hasn't countable extent, and hence it can't be countably compact. However, every star compact space is pseducompact. So the space must be pseudocompact but not countably compact! – Paul Jan 1 '12 at 10:58
The definition of $\operatorname{St}(K, \mathscr{U})$ added ad the end of your post does not say what you believe it says. You define a set $V\subseteq\mathscr{U}$ by $V=\{u\in \mathscr{U}: u \cap K \neq \emptyset\}$, then what is $\cup V$... I guess you mean something like $\operatorname{St}(K, \mathscr{U})=\bigcup\limits_{u\in V}u$. – Did Jan 1 '12 at 12:28
up vote 2 down vote accepted

Let $X=\Big(\beta\omega_1\times(\omega_2+1)\Big)\setminus\Big((\beta\omega_1\setminus \omega_1)\times\{\omega_2\}\Big)$ as a subspace of $\beta\omega_1\times(\omega_2+1)$; I claim that $X$ is star compact.

Let $\mathscr{U}$ be an open cover of $X$. For each $\xi\in\omega_1$ there are $U_\xi\in\mathscr{U}$ and $\alpha_n\in\omega_2$ such that $$\langle \xi,\omega_2\rangle\in \{\xi\}\times(\alpha_n,\omega_2]\subseteq U_\xi\;.$$ Let $\alpha=\sup_\xi\alpha_\xi<\omega_2$, and let $K=\beta\omega_1\times\{\alpha+1\}$; $K$ is compact, and $$\omega_1\times \{\omega_2\}\subseteq \operatorname{st}(K,\mathscr{U})\;,$$ since $U_\xi\subseteq \operatorname{st}(K,\mathscr{U})$ for each $\xi\in\omega_1$. The ordinal space $\omega_2$ is countably compact, so $\beta\omega_1\times\omega_2$ is countably compact and therefore star finite, and there is a finite $F\subseteq \beta\omega_1\times\omega_2$ such that $\beta\omega_1\times\omega_2\subseteq\operatorname{st}(F,\mathscr{U})$. But then $K\cup F$ is compact, and $\operatorname{st}(K\cup F,\mathscr{U})=X$, as desired.

However, $X$ is not star countable. To see this, let $$\mathscr{U}=\{\beta\omega_1\times\omega_2\}\cup\Big\{\{\xi\}\times(\omega_2+1):\xi\in\omega_1\Big\}\;;$$ $\mathscr{U}$ is certainly an open cover of $X$, but if $C$ is any countable subset of $X$, we can choose $\xi\in\omega_1$ such that $C\cap\big(\{\xi\}\times (\omega_2+1)\big)=\varnothing$, and then $\langle \xi,\omega_2\rangle\notin\operatorname{st}(C,\mathscr{U})$.

This is a modification of Example 2.1 of Yan-Kui Song, On $\mathcal{K}$-Starcompact Spaces, Bull. Malays. Math. Soc. (2) 30(1) (2007), 59-64, which is available as a PDF here.

share|cite|improve this answer

Your Answer


By posting your answer, you agree to the privacy policy and terms of service.

Not the answer you're looking for? Browse other questions tagged or ask your own question.