Take the 2-minute tour ×
Mathematics Stack Exchange is a question and answer site for people studying math at any level and professionals in related fields. It's 100% free, no registration required.

Let $R(g)$ denote the right regular representation of $SL_{2}(\mathbb{R})$ in $L^{2}(\Gamma\backslash SL_{2}(\mathbb{R}))$ with $\Gamma$ a congruence subgroup. Why is decomposing $R(g)$ equivalent to knowing how to construct automorphic forms on $SL_{2}(\mathbb{R})$?

share|improve this question

1 Answer 1

up vote 1 down vote accepted

In one direction, an irreducible subrepresentation $\pi$ of $L^2(\Gamma\backslash SL_2(\mathbb R))$ is either an odd or even principal series, holomorphic discrete series, or anti-holomorphic discrete series, since we know the irreducible unitary repns of $G=SL_2(\mathbb R)$. The holomorphic discrete series repns have a distinguished vector, namely, the lowest $K$-type (annihilated by suitable "lowering" operator). This vector is a holomorphic modular form. Similarly for anti-holomorphic discrete series. For even principal series, there is a distinguished vector, the $K$-invariant one, which gives a waveform. Almost-the-same for odd principal series. The Casimir operator is a scalar on irreducibles, so waveforms are eigenfunctions for the invariant Laplacian on $G/K$ (which Casimir descends-to on right $K$-invariant functions).

On the other hand, an $L^2$ function $f$ generates a unitary repn under right translation. If $f$ is annihilated by raising (or lowering) operators, then this repn is holomorphic (or anti-holo). If $f$ is a waveform, including being an eigenfunction for the invariant Laplacian, then the repn it generates is a principal series.

If the right regular repn on the adele group is decomposed, instead, then one also discusses the repns of the p-adic groups, and Hecke operators on automorphic forms. The choice of distinguished vector in irreducibles of p-adic groups is about newforms, treated classically by Atkin-Lehner and representation-theoretically by Casselman.

For larger groups, such as $GL(n)$, useful classifications of irreducible unitaries are more complicated, and perhaps not perfectly known. Conjectural parametrizations (local Langlands conjectures) are known for GL(n) by Harris-Taylor/Henniart. The archimedean cases have been substantially understood since the 1960s and work of Langlands, Schmid, Zuckerman, Vogan, and others, but comparison of different constructions seems still problemmatical. "Square-free level" repns of p-adic groups are those with Iwahori-fixed vectors, and the spherical ones among these are well understood (see Casselman's 1980 Compositio paper). The general case of repns with Iwahori-fixed vectors is more delicate. General constructions of supercuspidal repns for GL(n), for example, is from Kutzko and his collaborators. There are over-arching conjectures of Langlands and Arthur about global parametrizations of these repns... There is obviously much more to be said... (Inevitably, a short paragraph like this omits names of many important contributors.)

share|improve this answer

Your Answer


By posting your answer, you agree to the privacy policy and terms of service.

Not the answer you're looking for? Browse other questions tagged or ask your own question.