Let $f$ be a weight $k$ modular form for $\Gamma$ and $f\vert_{\sigma}(z) = f(\sigma z)(cz + d)^{-k}$ where $\sigma = \begin{pmatrix} a & b\\c & d\end{pmatrix}$. Why is it true that $f$ is holomorphic at the cusps of $\Gamma$ if and only if $f\vert_{\sigma}$ is holomorphic at $\infty$ for all $\sigma \in SL_{2}(\mathbb{Z})$? (also couldn't this be weakened to say instead the $\sigma_{i} \in SL_{2}(\mathbb{Z})$ which the cusps $p_{i}$ to $\infty$?)
Tell me more
×
Mathematics Stack Exchange is a question and answer site for
people studying math at any level and professionals in related fields. It's 100% free, no registration required.
|