Mathematics Stack Exchange is a question and answer site for people studying math at any level and professionals in related fields. Join them; it only takes a minute:

Sign up
Here's how it works:
  1. Anybody can ask a question
  2. Anybody can answer
  3. The best answers are voted up and rise to the top

Here's a proposition from Lee's Smooth Manifolds:

Let $V$ be a real vector space of dimension $n$, let $(E^i)$ be any basis for $V$, and let $(\epsilon^i)$ be the dual basis. The set of all $k$-tensors of the form $\epsilon^{i_1}\otimes...\otimes\epsilon^{i_k}$ for $1 \leq i_1,...,i_k \leq n$ is a basis for the set of all covariant $k$-tensors on $V$, denoted by $T^k(V)$, which therefore has dimension $n^k$.

I want to construct an example based on this proposition. Let $V=\mathbb{R}^3$, and let $e_1, e_2, e_3$ denote the usual basis for $\mathbb{R}^3$. Then the dual basis $(\epsilon^i)$ is $dx, dy$ and $dz$. Then $dx\otimes dy, dx\otimes dz, dy\otimes dz, dy\otimes dx, dz\otimes dy, dz\otimes dx, dx\otimes dx, dy\otimes dy$ and $dz\otimes dz$ form a basis for $T^2(\mathbb{R}^3)$.

Is the example correct until this point? If so, which of them are the symmetric 2-tensors?

share|cite|improve this question
You have $dy\otimes dz$ listed twice but missed $dz\otimes dy$, otherwise the list is complete. – Alex Becker Dec 24 '11 at 23:58
@Alex I corrected it. – user20353 Dec 25 '11 at 0:02
@Alex I am not so sure that these form a dual basis for $\mathbb{R}^3$. – user20353 Dec 25 '11 at 0:07
I'm not sure what you're asking. I just assumed that you were using $dx,dy,dz$ to denote the three elements of the dual basis. If you are trying to attach a differential meaning to these, then you're incorrect. The dual basis is simply the set of covectors $e_1^T,e_2^T,e_3^T$. – Alex Becker Dec 25 '11 at 0:10
@user20353: both your dual basis $(dx,dy,dz)$ and the basis for $T^2(\mathbb{R}^3)$ are correct. Finding the symmetric ones should be a minor task. – M.B. Dec 25 '11 at 0:38
up vote 4 down vote accepted

Yes, you are correct. As you have quoted, $T^k(V)$ has dimension $n^k$. Now $n=3$ and $k=2$. Therefore $3^2=9$ is the number of bases and there are $9$ elements in $$\{dx\otimes dy, dx\otimes dz, dy\otimes dz, dy\otimes dx, dz\otimes dy, dz\otimes dx, dx\otimes dx, dy\otimes dy, dz\otimes dz\}.$$

None of them is sysmmetric 2-tensor. By definition, symmemetric tensor is a tensor $T$ that is invariant under a permutation of its vector arguments. Therefore, permutate $x$ and $y$, we have $$dx\otimes dy\leftrightarrow dy\otimes dx,\hspace{2mm}dx\otimes dz\leftrightarrow dy\otimes dz, \hspace{2mm} dz\otimes dy\leftrightarrow dz\otimes dx,\hspace{2mm} dx\otimes dx\leftrightarrow dy\otimes dy.$$ On the other hand, permutate $x$ and $z$, we have $$dx\otimes dx\leftrightarrow dz\otimes dz.$$ Therefore, none of them is symmetric. However, you can find symmetric 2-tensor by forming the linear combination of them (since they form a basis), e.g. $$dx\otimes dy+dy\otimes dx+dx\otimes dz+dz\otimes dx+dy\otimes dz+dz\otimes dy$$ or $$dx\otimes dx+dy\otimes dy+dz\otimes dz$$ are symmetric 2-tensors.

share|cite|improve this answer
$dx \otimes dx$, $dy \otimes dy$, and $dz \otimes dz$ are indeed symmetric. Being invariant "under a permutation of its vector arguments" does not mean invariant under exchanging x,y,z---it means when viewing a tensor as a bilinear form, it is invariant under a permutation of the arguments of that form. – Santiago Canez Dec 25 '11 at 2:08

Just to elaborate on the comment of Santiago Canez:

We say that a covariant $k$-tensor $T$ is symmetric if it is unchanged under permutation of arguments, i.e: $$T(X_1, \ldots, X_k) = T(X_{\sigma(1)}, \ldots, X_{\sigma(k)})$$ where $\sigma$ is any permuation of $k$ elements.

So it is immediate that $dx\otimes dx$, $dy\otimes dy$ and $dz\otimes dz$ are symmetric. Furthermore, there is a natural projection from $T^k(V)$ to the set of symmetric tensors called symmetrization. Let $S_k$ be the group of permutations of $\{1, \ldots, k\}$ and for any $\sigma\in S_k$ define $$T^\sigma(X_1, \ldots, X_k) = T(X_{\sigma(1)}, \ldots, X_{\sigma(k)}).$$ Then we define $\text{Sym}: T^k(V) \to\text{symmetric tensors}$, by $$\text{Sym}\, T = \frac{1}{k!}\displaystyle\sum_{\sigma\in S_k}T^\sigma.$$ Then $\text{Sym}\, T$ is a symmetric tensor.

share|cite|improve this answer

Your Answer


By posting your answer, you agree to the privacy policy and terms of service.

Not the answer you're looking for? Browse other questions tagged or ask your own question.