Mathematics Stack Exchange is a question and answer site for people studying math at any level and professionals in related fields. Join them; it only takes a minute:

Sign up
Here's how it works:
  1. Anybody can ask a question
  2. Anybody can answer
  3. The best answers are voted up and rise to the top

I conjecture the following inequality is true $$\ln x \le (x - 1)\ln\frac{x}{x-1}$$ for all $x > 1$, but I cannot give a proof. I will appreciate if someone can provide one.

share|cite|improve this question
Lord Wolfram says, the solution of your inequality is $1<x \leq 2$, and not $x > 1$. So, your conjecture is disproved!!… – user21436 Dec 24 '11 at 16:47
Actually, for $x \geq 2$, ln$x \geq (x-1)$ln$(x/x-1)$ is true.… – HbCwiRoJDp Dec 24 '11 at 16:52
Could you explain how you conjecture this? – Vladimir Dec 24 '11 at 16:52
Make the substitution $y = x - 1$ and exponentiate to get the conjectured inequality of $1+y \leq (1+1/y)^y$ for all $y > 0$. Since the right-hand side converges to $e$ as $y \to \infty$, then the conjecture is obviously false. – cardinal Dec 24 '11 at 19:42

A counter example will disprove your conjecture, take $x=3$. You'll see after suitable juggling, that, $$e \leq \dfrac{3}{4}$$ which is a serious contradiction.

In my comment, I posted a link where Lord Wolfram computed in a considerably less time. Now, he has take pain in the form of more time to plot this inequality and show you its solution.

I thought I will also include, comment from @Bircan. He says, the reverse inequality $$\ln x \geq (x-1)\cdot\ln\left(\frac{x}{x-1}\right)$$ is true for $x \geq 2$. This additionally tells you equality holds at $x=2$, as already pointed out by Lord Wolfram in his graph.

Thank you Bircan, for you comment.

share|cite|improve this answer
Thank you Kannappan. The inequality is only locally true. Too bad Lord Wolfram doesn't give us analytical proof, but I believe him. – Martin Dec 24 '11 at 18:14

The inequality is equivalent to $$-\frac 1x\ln \frac 1x\leq\left(1-\frac 1x\right)\ln\left(\frac 1{1-\frac 1x}\right),$$ i.e., putting $t=x^{-1}$, $$t\ln t\geq (1-t)\ln (1-t).$$ Put $h(t)=t\ln t$ and $g(t)=h(t)-h(1-t)=t\ln t-(1-t)\ln(1-t)$. $g'(t)=1+\ln t+h'(1-t)=1+\ln t-(-\ln(1-t)-\frac{1-t}{1-t})=2+\ln (t(1-t)),$ so $g$ is increasing in $\left(\frac 12-e^{-1},\frac 12+e^{-1}\right)$, decreasing outside this interval, and $g(\frac 12)=0$. Since $\lim_{x\to 0}g(x)=\lim_{x\to 1}g(x)=0$, we get that $g$ is non negative on $\left(\frac 12,1\right)$. It can be observed on this graphic:

enter image description here

share|cite|improve this answer


$$\dfrac{1}{\ln\left(\dfrac{x}{x-1}\right)} < \dfrac{x-1}{\ln(x)}$$

the l.h.s. is asymptotic to $x$ and the r.h.s. is asymptotic to $\pi(x)$ by the PNT. But $\pi(x)/x\sim 0$. So the left hand side is growing much faster than the right hand side.(*)

(*)The key to the left hand side is the identity:

$$\ln\left(\frac{x}{x-1}\right)= \frac{1}{x}+\frac{1}{2x^2}+\frac{1}{3x^3}+\cdots\mbox{ etc.}$$

For large $x$ this is essentially $\frac{1}{x}$, i.e.,$\frac{1}{\ln\left(\frac{x}{x-1}\right)} \sim x.$

share|cite|improve this answer
I would appreciate help in figuring out the second equation, i.e, the limit is 1/2. Please elaborate. – user21436 Dec 24 '11 at 17:15
@Kannapppan: thanks for the edit. latex and i are not yet compatible. – daniel Dec 24 '11 at 17:16
@Kannappan: also Lord Wolfram! But I noticed that numerically the l.h.s. is close to x. I will hopefully be able to add a proof but will have to wait til after holidays. – daniel Dec 24 '11 at 17:29
Shall definitely be looking forward to it. And, I shall also think about it till then. I actively participate in SE only because, questions such as this come up so often, that you'll learn a lot. – user21436 Dec 24 '11 at 17:42

Your Answer


By posting your answer, you agree to the privacy policy and terms of service.

Not the answer you're looking for? Browse other questions tagged or ask your own question.