Take the 2-minute tour ×
Mathematics Stack Exchange is a question and answer site for people studying math at any level and professionals in related fields. It's 100% free, no registration required.

In response to my previous question I got a wonderful answer from Prof.Emerton explaining about the similarities between $Ш$ and class group. In order to add something the comments I got from Mr. B R were not sufficient in figuring out the complete idea of the map I was expecting, I got a half way solution to prove that there exists an homomorphism from class group to Ш which can be as follows


Let $O_K$ be the ring of integers of $K$ then for each fractional ideal $I$ of $O_K$, the ideal $IO_H$ is principal, where $H$ is the the maximal abelian unramified extension of the field $K$ ( and we know that its degree is equal to class number of $K$ ) . Therefore, there exists $x \in H^*$ such that $IO_H = xO_H$.

For each $\sigma \in \rm{Gal(H/K)}$, we have $(IO_H)^\sigma = IO_H$ so $(x^\sigma) = (x)$ which means that $\sigma(x)/x \in O^{*}_{L}$ . Therefore, $x\in \bar K^*$ suchthat $\sigma(x)/x \in \bar O^*$ so the map $\sigma \mapsto \sigma(x)/x $ is a cocycle in $Z^1(K,\bar O^{*}_{K})$. If $y$ is another generator of $IO_H$, then $y/x \in O^{*}_{L}$ , so $\sigma(x/y)/(x/y)$ is a coboundary, so it is trivial in $H^1(K,\bar O^{*}_{K})$.

Clearly, the map $\alpha$ that takes $I$ to the cocycle $\alpha(I)(\sigma) = \sigma(x)/x$ is a homomorphism. To show that it induces the desired homomorphism, it is enough to check that if $I = (\beta)$ for $\beta \in K^*$, then $\alpha(I)$ is trivial. Then, we may choose $x =\alpha$ so $\alpha(I)(\sigma)= \sigma(\alpha)/\alpha = \alpha/\alpha= 1$, since $\alpha \in K$. Therefore, the cocycle is trivial.


So can anyone offer still more easier proof or any alternate proof. ( as I think that there is some problem with the proof )

Are there any known proofs that shows the isomorphism between Sha and Class group ?

P.S : Mr.B R remarked that there can be a nicer way to prove the homomorphism, but he didn't give complete details ( he indeed gave some details but those are not enough to study completely ) , nor any references. So I thought I can ask a separate question, so that the same user or the other users can help.

Thanks a lot.

Yours truly.

Iyengar.

share|improve this question
    
Merry Christmas to all –  Iyengar Dec 24 '11 at 16:05
add comment

1 Answer

I don't have enough reputation here to comment so I'll make this an answer:

Have you looked at http://www.its.caltech.edu/~ajorza/notes/analytic_cl_bsd.pdf ?

It seems possible since in section 3 the author does exactly what you say give or take a few cosmetic changes. Are you the author ? If not then perhaps you ought to reference it in your question !

share|improve this answer
    
Wow fantastic, for this reference I have been searching for months, thanks a lot !!, actually I read these paper in a library but later couldn't remember where did I read it, but I took some notes in a paper, I copied only that part of homomorphism, your link was very useful in retrieving the entire content, thank you and merry christmas !! @dke –  Iyengar Dec 25 '11 at 4:49
    
But I didn't select this as an answer, but only up-voted, as its only a half-part of what I asked ( only reference part ) . –  Iyengar Dec 25 '11 at 5:03
add comment

Your Answer

 
discard

By posting your answer, you agree to the privacy policy and terms of service.

Not the answer you're looking for? Browse other questions tagged or ask your own question.