Mathematics Stack Exchange is a question and answer site for people studying math at any level and professionals in related fields. It's 100% free, no registration required.

Sign up
Here's how it works:
  1. Anybody can ask a question
  2. Anybody can answer
  3. The best answers are voted up and rise to the top

I'm stuck on the proof of Theorem 4.14 in Washington - Introduction to Cyclotomic Fields.

We take a prime power $n = p^m$ and define $\pi = \zeta_n - 1$, $\zeta_n$ a primitive $n$-th root of unity. Let $\mathbb{Q}(\zeta_n)^+ = \mathbb{Q}(\zeta_n + \zeta_n^{-1})$ be the maximal real subfield. The proof claims that the $\pi$-adic valuation of $\mathbb{Q}(\zeta_n)$ only takes on even values on $\mathbb{Q}(\zeta_n)^+$. I'm not sure how to show this.

Thanks for any help.

share|cite|improve this question
up vote 2 down vote accepted

The key is to notice $\mathcal{O}_{\mathbb{Q}(\zeta_n)}$ is totally ramified at $p$ and there is a unique prime of $\mathcal{O}_{\mathbb{Q}(\zeta_n)}$ which lies above $p,$ namely $\pi.$ It follows that the same holds for any intermediate extension $L$ satisfying $\mathbb{Q} \subset L \subset \mathbb{Q}(\zeta_n).$ So if $\mathfrak{p} _L$ is the unique prime of $\mathcal{O}_L$ above $p,$

$$e(\mathfrak{p}_L | p) = [L:\mathbb{Q}].$$

And thus,

$$e((\pi) | \mathfrak{p}_L) = [\mathbb{Q}(\zeta_n):L].$$

It follows

$$v_{\pi}(\mathbb{Q}(\zeta_n)^+) = v_{\pi}((\pi) \cap \mathcal{O}_{\mathbb{Q}(\zeta_n)^+})\mathbb{Z} = v_{\pi}(\mathfrak{p}_{\mathbb{Q}(\zeta_n)^+})\mathbb{Z} = e(\mathfrak{p}_{\mathbb{Q}(\zeta_n)} | \mathfrak{p}_{\mathbb{Q}(\zeta_n)^+}) \mathbb{Z} = 2\mathbb{Z}.$$

share|cite|improve this answer

Your Answer

 
discard

By posting your answer, you agree to the privacy policy and terms of service.

Not the answer you're looking for? Browse other questions tagged or ask your own question.