Tell me more ×
Mathematics Stack Exchange is a question and answer site for people studying math at any level and professionals in related fields. It's 100% free, no registration required.

Let $R\subset A\times A$ a binary relation, and note $a\sim b$ for $(a,b)\in R$. We define

$$(a,b)\in R\circ R\Leftrightarrow \exists b\in A : a\sim b, b\sim c$$

and $R^n=R\circ\dots\circ R$.

My books says that $(a,b)\in R^n$ iff there is a path of length $n$ in the graph of $R$. Isn't it false ?

For example, if $(a,b)\in R^3$, there exists $c\in A$ such that $(a,c)\in R^2$, $(c,b)\in R^2$ $\Leftrightarrow$ there exists $d, f\in A$ such that $$a\sim d\sim c\sim f\sim b$$ which is a path of length 4, not 3.

share|improve this question

1 Answer

up vote 2 down vote accepted

Your book is right. Note that $R^3 = R \circ R \circ R = R^2 \circ R$, not $R^2 \circ R^2$.

share|improve this answer
Thank you, sorry for the confusion :) – Klaus Nov 7 '10 at 17:02

Your Answer

 
discard

By posting your answer, you agree to the privacy policy and terms of service.

Not the answer you're looking for? Browse other questions tagged or ask your own question.