Take the 2-minute tour ×
Mathematics Stack Exchange is a question and answer site for people studying math at any level and professionals in related fields. It's 100% free, no registration required.

We want to solve the PDE $u_t + \left( \frac{x^2 + y^2}{2}\right)u_{xx} + (x-y^2)u_y + ryu = 0 $ where $r$ is some constant and $u(x,y,T) = V(x,y)$ is given. Write an SDE and express $u(x,y,0)$ as the expectation of some function of the path $X_t, Y_t$.

Attempt: I tried to use the multivariate backward equation (2 dimensional) to recover the original SDE's and ended up with $dX_t= \sqrt{x^2 + y^2} dW_t$ and $dY_t = (x-y^2)dt + \sqrt{x^2 + y^2} dW_t$.

The problem I have is recovering the expectation. I'm not too familiar with multidimensional Feynman-Kac, but judging by the $ryu$ term and extrapolating from the one-dimensional case, the desired expectation should have the form E[exp(riemann integral of Y_t)]. Can anyone shed some light on this? Thank you.

EDIT: Oops, wrote the forward equation incorrectly and made a typo, the SDE's have changed

share|improve this question
    
Is it really missing a $u_{yy}$ term? –  Jon Dec 18 '11 at 10:18
    
@Bob : I think you should start from that fact that you would like to express $V(x,y)=E[F(X_T,Y_T)|X_t=x,Y_t=y]$ as a martingale for a regular function $F$ where $X_t$ and $Y_t$ are following unknwon SDE (so the coefficient are the unknowns) and use Itô on $F(X_T,Y_T)$ to retrieve your PDE by setting the drift on $dF$ equal to 0. I don't feel like doing the calculations but I think this should do the trick. Regards –  TheBridge Dec 18 '11 at 12:22
    
@Bob : By the way the final condition giving $F$ is missing in your question. –  TheBridge Dec 18 '11 at 13:14
    
@Jon, yes it seems so. The original problem statement is here (problem 5): math.nyu.edu/faculty/goodman/teaching/StochCalc/assignments/… –  David Dec 19 '11 at 0:38
    
@Bob, thanks I'll think about it. Also u(x,y,T) = V(x,y) where V is some "payoff" function is the final condition I think. –  David Dec 19 '11 at 0:41

1 Answer 1

up vote 1 down vote accepted

What do you think about the system of SDEs :
$$dX_t=\sqrt{X_t^2+Y_t^2}dW_t$$ $$dY_t=(X_t-Y_t^2)dt$$ And finally :

$$u(X_t,Y_t,t)=\mathbb{E}[V(X_T,Y_T).e^{-\int_t^TrY_s.ds}|X_t,Y_t]$$

You can check that $u$ is satisfying your PDE, but as always check my calculations as I am used to making errors.

The way I found this is the following : I set $r=0$, then looking for $u$ as an expectation of $V(X_T,Y_T)$ and deriving its SDE via Itô's lemma and looking for a null drift and then indentifying terms with the original PDE with those coming from the drift of $dV$ with $dX_t=a_1(X,Y,t)dt+b_1(X,Y,t)dW_t$ and $dX_t=a_2(X,Y,t)dt+b_2(X,Y,t)dB_t$ gives the solution for $a_1,a_2,b_1,b_2$ when $r=0$ ($B$ and $W$ are independent Brownian motions, which is coming from the intuitive fact that there is no $u_{xy}$ terms in the PDE).

Then two minutes of reflection gives that $F(X_T,Y_T,T)=V(X_T,Y_T).e^{-\int_T^Tr.Y_sds}$ respects the final condition and acts on the drift part of $dF$ by only multiplying the PDE's with a $e^{-\int_t^Tr.Y_s.ds}$ and adds the $rYV$ term which was missing in the solution with $r=0$.

Best regards

share|improve this answer
    
Hmm, you're right, Y should not have a diffusion term. This was a mistake on my part in working from the backward equations. I now know the approach is to use Ito or equivalently, use the tower property and make a Taylor expansion on f. There are quite a few typos in my OP, but thanks for verifying my intuition. –  David Dec 19 '11 at 21:17
    
Also, I normally would not do this, but I'm a little pressed for time. A new sample exam was released today: math.nyu.edu/faculty/goodman/teaching/StochCalc2011/assignments/… . I managed to complete all problems except for 9 with your help (problems like 18 are no longer a problem). In 9, I can see very easily that $X_t$ is distributed as Normal(at, t), but do you know what's the easiest way to do the conditioning on the other variables? I seem to have forgotten some rather basic probability theory. Thanks. –  David Dec 19 '11 at 21:25
    
@Bob : Sasha gave you an excellent answer on your new posted question. By the way did I answered properly your question ? If so you might consider accepting it. Regards. –  TheBridge Dec 20 '11 at 9:34

Your Answer

 
discard

By posting your answer, you agree to the privacy policy and terms of service.

Not the answer you're looking for? Browse other questions tagged or ask your own question.