Take the 2-minute tour ×
Mathematics Stack Exchange is a question and answer site for people studying math at any level and professionals in related fields. It's 100% free, no registration required.

Suppose $A$ and $B$ are (complex) unital associative algebras (with not necessarily the same units) and $B\subseteq A$. Also, let $\mathcal{L}$ be a maximal left ideal in $A$. Is it true that either $B\subseteq\mathcal{L}$ or $B\cap \mathcal{L}$ is a maximal left ideal in $B$?

share|improve this question
add comment

1 Answer 1

The answer is no. Let $A = \mathbb{C}(x)$ and $B = \mathbb{C}[x] \subset A$, i.e. the field of rational functions in one variable and the subring of polynomials. Consider $\mathcal{L} = 0$, the zero ideal in $A$.

If $A$ and $B$ are commutative, finitely generated, and have the same unity element, the answer is yes: this is nontrivial and closely related to the Nullstellensatz. This counterexample shows that the finitely generated hypothesis is necessary, but I am unsure about the rest.

Edit: You may be interested in the notion of PI ring (short for polynomial identity ring). Some Googling and a Springerlink search turned up a 1966 paper of Amitsur and Procesi, "Jacobson rings and Hilbert algebras with polynomial identities," which contains a closely related theorem (I think it implies an affirmative answer to your question) for finitely generated PI algebras over a field.

Before spending too much time investigating these topics in noncommutative algebra, I would suggest getting comfortable with the relevant commutative algebra, if you aren't already. Look up "Jacobson ring" if you are unfamiliar with this notion.

share|improve this answer
    
Thank you. Do you think it might work in finitely generated, non-commutative algebras? –  SteelplantFailure Dec 18 '11 at 12:40
add comment

Your Answer

 
discard

By posting your answer, you agree to the privacy policy and terms of service.

Not the answer you're looking for? Browse other questions tagged or ask your own question.